If students only play games and watch unhealthy things online, then for such students, even if you prohibit them from accessing the Internet, they will go to video game rooms or bars and accept unhealthy culture. Influence will accelerate his deterioration!!

Today’s society is mixed~!

The Internet is the world~! Yes, but there are both good and evil at the same time, and middle school students are a group with imperfect psychology and social perception.

There is only a lot more bad information on the Internet~! Middle school students cannot fully identify or cannot identify

The third is the threat of "information garbage". When the Internet brings the dawn of a new cultural civilization to mankind, Internet information garbage and information drugs also arrive at the same time. Violence, superstition, and pornography are everywhere on the Internet, and obscenities are everywhere. Internet garbage is rampant, seriously polluting the Internet cultural environment.

The fourth is the threat of “information fraud”. On the Internet, whether it is the organizers who manipulate the network or the low-quality and sophisticated netizens, they often use network technology to forge fake information to defraud the audience. The use of computers to edit and manipulate information to spread information fraud online is many times greater than "rumors to confuse the public" in the traditional sense. The Internet is a big wall for the world to read information. A piece of false information can make millions of people confused between true and false in an instant, taking false information as true, and confusing the public. The biggest threat is the ideological fraud and cultural fraud of online information, which will directly affect the formation of people's world outlook, outlook on life, and values.

3. Characteristics of student netizens

1. High randomness. Both the reasons for surfing the Internet and the topics of chatting show that college students have strong arbitrariness in surfing the Internet. 10.4% of students go online when they are happy, 8.5% of students go online when they are upset, 27.7% of students go online when they are bored, and 53.4% ??of students go online from time to time. In terms of chat topics, 15.7% talk about personal emotions and 16.4% talk about interests. Regarding hobbies, 19.3% talked about life experiences, 5.5% conducted academic discussions, and 43.1% chatted without focus.

2. Poor network knowledge. Many college students don't know what to do online except chatting, using free e-mails, and reading news. The survey shows that 16.4% of students do not know what "search engines" and "BBS" are, and among those who know, 25.6% and 62.6% of students have not used them respectively. In addition to sending and receiving E-mails, 8% of students use free e-mails to communicate with work, 34% of students use them to send and receive e-magazines, 2% of students also use them to send and receive other services such as greeting cards and mobile phone text messages, and 56% of students use them to send and receive free e-mails. There is no other use.

Figure 2: Other uses of e-mail boxes

3. Immaturity. 63.1% of students have been delayed in class due to surfing the Internet. Students pay more attention to the entertainment, information, and expansion of living space functions of the Internet rather than the function of learning. When it comes to the impact of the Internet on learning, 22.4% of students believe that information can be obtained from the Internet to promote learning; 40.7% of students believe that it can expand their knowledge, broaden their horizons, and improve their thinking ability; 26.3% of students believe that it takes too much time Online entertainment leads to a decline in performance; 10.6% of students believe that bad information on the Internet will have adverse effects. Regarding illegal and harmful information sites, 27.1% of students have entered them by mistake, 31.3% of students have entered them out of curiosity, 17.5% of students have been exposed to them frequently, and 24.1% of students have never been exposed to them. These unhealthy contents have seriously affected the physical and mental health of college students. Development, although not mainstream, is a phenomenon that cannot be ignored. :Thank you, Chairman! Dear judges, teachers, and classmates, hello everyone! Just now, the opponent's fellow debater was talking about online education with great interest, but online education is nothing more than exaggerated hype by businessmen. Not only in China, but also in the United States, a survey by the authoritative magazine "USA Today" showed that 86% of teachers, librarians and computer managers surveyed believed that children's use of the Internet would not improve their classroom performance.

The other debater’s eloquent talk just now is nothing more than showing everyone here how fast and convenient the Internet is in information exchange. However, I would like to advise the opponent’s debate partner not to look at things in a foggy way when it comes to middle school students accessing the Internet. I would like to lend the opponent a pair of eyes to see clearly, clearly and truly the pros and cons of the Internet.

Quantitatively speaking, there are currently three difficult-to-solve problems on the Internet: the first category is online security issues, mainly referring to hackers, viruses and online fraud; the second category refers to the spread of pornographic, violent and hateful information; the third category refers to It is all kinds of information pollution and garbage. In the impassioned four-minute speech of the opponent's debater, the world's major websites have been hacked nearly 200 times, and 1.7 million Internet computers around the world may have been infected by the latest virus...< /p>

Secondly, qualitatively speaking, the specific subjects we are discussing today are middle school students. They are a special group. They are easy to accept new things and have an extremely strong desire for knowledge, but they are not yet mature physically and psychologically. Lack of ability to distinguish right from wrong when dealing with new things, and poor self-control. These inherent characteristics and the inherent problems of the Internet essentially constitute an inherent and irreconcilable contradiction between middle school students and the Internet.

The reality has forced state agencies to promulgate special laws on network management. However, the openness, freedom, and borderless characteristics of the Internet also make it difficult for the law to be effective. As Negroponte pointed out, in the online world, the existing laws of human society are like "fishes panting desperately on the deck." Therefore, at present and in the foreseeable future, various disadvantages of the Internet still exist. Perhaps on a certain day of a certain year, a certain month, the Internet will become a pure land. But ten thousand years is too long. We are seizing the day. The reality is: the Internet has caused varying degrees of harm to the physical and mental health of middle school students.

Students, in the face of our partners throwing themselves into the "net", and the "net" is deeply affectionate, in order to avoid the "net" being unbearable, we call on you to get off the net when it is time to do so. Refreshing and refreshing time.

Today, the opponent’s debate partner listed a large number of examples and did not hesitate to exaggerate how good middle school students are on the Internet! A series of disadvantages caused by the Internet for middle school students can be downplayed, and even wiped away as gently as a spider web! Such an attitude of disrespecting the facts, missing the forest for the trees, or blinding the view is indeed unconvincing! At the same time, I can’t explain the characteristics of middle school students who are the subject of today’s debate. You must know that people need to be self-aware! What’s more important is that there is no standard for comparing the “pros and cons” of the other party today. So what’s your argument? Where does it come from?

Today, we discuss this subject full of subjective conjecture with each other based on the pursuit of our own healthy growth as middle school students. Whether it is more pros and cons, or more cons than good, isn't our ultimate goal to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages? Recognizing the seriousness of the problem and then trying to solve it is the fundamental starting point of our position today. Let me once again summarize our views:

First, only by recognizing the three major problems of the current network can we pursue making the network a pure land. The helplessness of legal sanctions, the paleness of moral standards, and the backwardness of technical restrictions all make people of insight feel anxious and uneasy. Look at those underground Internet cafes and the web interfaces browsed by middle school students. It can be said that pornography and garbage are flying together, falsehood and violence. Facts tell us that if middle school students do not control the Internet, how can society believe that we are the bright future of our motherland?

Second, only by realizing that middle school students are a special group can we face up to real problems. We never expect that every middle school student who surfs the Internet will become a prophetic sage or saint, and move from heteronomy to self-discipline. It is a long and tortuous process. Only the almighty "God" can send countless "angels" down to earth and say to every middle school student who surfs the Internet: "Hey, man, don't look at this as an evil thing." But the facts tell us that middle school students often Out of curiosity or impulse, deliberately looking for pornographic and violent information, which can lead to social problems such as sexual crimes. At this moment, guess what God will think of the other debater? He would only say: "I'm sorry for the big words. It's not that I'm too soft-hearted, it's just that I'm helpless."

Third, only by realizing that middle school students' Internet access does more harm than good can all aspects of society and various means be mobilized. Let’s use our strengths and avoid weaknesses, pursue advantages and avoid disadvantages. We are the flowers in May, but sometimes the flowers are eroded by pests. Only by getting rid of the shackles of the Internet can we embrace the times with youth. We are the rising sun, but sometimes the sun is obscured by dark clouds. , only by getting off the net when it’s time to do so can you ignite the future with your life! "The green mountains cannot cover it, and it will flow eastward after all."

We have a dream. One morning in the new century, when I cast my last glance at the spiritual home of mankind that has endured all catastrophes, our middle school students are facing new challenges with a new look and new state! Thanks!

This argument is actually very dangerous - I mean in a debate, it is easy to be taken advantage of.

Because the title is "Internet addiction does more harm than good", not "Being addicted to the Internet does more harm than good".

The other party does not need to refute your remarks about "disadvantages". You can say: We can reduce the impact of "disadvantages" and strengthen the role of "advantages" through supervision.

Secondly, qualitatively speaking, the subject of our discussion today is college students. College students are a special group. They are in a stage of rapid physical and mental development and are highly curious. Here, we would like to emphasize again: middle school students are emotionally driven and lack the ability to judge right from wrong and have no self-control. When they come into contact with bad information online, due to a lack of self-control, they will gradually accept it, causing them to develop a fixed mindset and gradually form a wrong world view, outlook on life and values. It can be seen from the data that some students often go online to chat and play games, even for 4-5 hours at a time. The main task of middle school students is to study, but middle school students ignore their studies when surfing the Internet. This essentially creates an irreconcilable contradiction inherent in middle school students' Internet access.

Within one minute, major websites around the world have been hacked. Nearly 50,000 computers worldwide may have been hacked nearly 500,000 times. Online security is really difficult to solve. Besides, the various measures just listed by the opponent’s fellow debater can eliminate online pornography invisibly, and can it give the Internet a pure land?

Teenagers will waste a lot of time online, which will lead to a decline in academic performance. Don't say that the Internet can help you study. If the Internet can really help you improve your grades, why does the country still invest so much manpower and material resources? What about improving our country’s educational institutions? Even if you can learn knowledge online, why do you still carry your schoolbag to school every day?

2. Excessive use of the Internet is harmful to people's health and social interaction. Robert Kraut of Carnegie Mellon University and his colleagues conducted personality assessments on some experimental subjects before they started using the Internet and one or two years later. They found that: the more time people spend online, the less likely they are to communicate with loved ones. If you have fewer friends, you will have fewer friends in real life, and you will feel lonely and depressed at the same time.

The other party’s friend is explaining the benefits of the Internet. Yes, the Internet is good. But it’s not suitable for middle school students, so why not? I have discussed this from an educational perspective in the free debate. But it's a pity that the other debate partner doesn't know what we are debating here today? Is it a problem with middle school students or a problem with the Internet? This is not to blame for the other party’s friend, because the other party’s friend is an adult, not a minor. Fortunately, the opposing debate partner knows that middle school students must surf the Internet under the accompaniment of their parents. In this regard, I would like to thank the opposing debate partner for supporting us in looking at the issue of Internet access for middle school students from an educational perspective. Your argument can only be that current middle school students are unable to act responsibly for their actions online. Also, why is the most common place for surfing the Internet now - Internet cafes. There is a saying: Minors are not allowed to enter. This is also recognized by you. Thank you very much.

Why do all Internet cafes say this now? This can only prove the correctness of our point of view, which is: primary and secondary school students use the Internet to do more harm than good

1. What are the personal, social and family roots of online dating? What is the impact on reality?

< p>2 Let’s talk about the phenomenon of silence in chat rooms that are popular but still occur. 2. How can the management handle the situation of microphone interruption in the chat room and adjust the atmosphere of the chat room?

3 Do you think it is a sin to indulge in online emotions caused by life pressure and emotional unhappiness?

4 Are a person’s mental age and actual age necessarily directly proportional? 3. What do you think of online memorial services?

5 On the Internet, how do you like to perceive netizens: sound? text? video? 2. If you like someone, will you restrict his (her) whereabouts, including him (her) How many netizens of the opposite sex do you have? 3. If you encountered such a situation, what would you do? (Excluding simply blocking)

6. Is there a big gap between your original intention of surfing the Internet and what you met? To what extent can you communicate with netizens? Which is likely to hurt more, online or in real life? The distance between the Internet and the Internet is as close as it is near, and it is far away when it is far away. How can we clearly distinguish reality from the Internet?

Although the rule prohibiting the purchase of computers by "freshman" freshmen seems to be "one size fits all", I believe that the vast majority of parents will agree with this approach of a certain university. Some people may accuse this regulation of restricting students' freedom, but if you think about it carefully, why can't road novices who have just obtained their driver's licenses drive on the highway in their first year? The traffic management bureau made such regulations considering that the skills of novices are not yet mature and their road experience is not yet rich. Why did the relevant departments issue regulations that teenagers under the age of 16 cannot enter Internet cafes and gaming venues? Because they have poor self-control, they can easily become addicted to it. Therefore, this approach of the university is also justifiable.

The proud man who has just stepped into the ivory tower has just been freed from the heavy study burden in middle school and entered the university, a much more relaxed environment. In addition, there are no parents and teachers around to supervise him all the time. Therefore, It is very easy to relax yourself, especially when encountering certain incentives, which can reach the point where it is difficult to control. As we all know, there are two things that college students are most likely to become addicted to, one is the Internet, and the other is computer games. In the most critical role-changing period of the freshman year, the university's move was well-intentioned out of the spirit of responsibility for students.

Although this cannot be entirely blamed on computers, it is difficult to believe that they can restrain themselves during the critical period of their first year of college when temptations such as the Internet and computer games are within reach. Newspapers once reported that a college student in Jiangxi Province just entered college. He felt disappointed because he was no longer favored. In addition, he couldn't get along with his classmates, so he spent all day in the dormitory with the computer, gradually developed autistic mentality, and even committed suicide. If during his transitional period of psychological instability in college, the dormitory had not provided him with the convenience of access to the Internet, it might have given him more opportunities to communicate with the outside world, and the tragedy would have been avoided.

Paying attention to young people’s Internet use means paying attention to the future. Only by fully recognizing the fact that the Internet does more harm than good to young people, can we attach great importance to it and guide it effectively, so that our future generation will not be destroyed by "electronic heroin" that is even worse than drugs

In May 2001, a major event occurred in the Internet world, which was the Sino-US hacker war involving tens of thousands of people. Guo Xin did not participate in the attacks on U.S. websites. He believes that participating in politics goes against the spirit of hackers, and repeatedly hacking websites does not conform to the principle of hackers not to repeat work. He keeps an eye on the progress of the red-black war and tries his best to contact hacked websites. If the other party trusts them, he will help repair the hacked servers. "In terms of the quality of hacking, Americans are still slightly better. Many hacked Chinese websites have taken considerable protective measures," Guo Xin commented. "Private hacker activities are not terrible. What really harms the country are those with ulterior motives." Hackers who steal national secrets. " He believes that the most important significance of this red-black war is that it serves as a warning, and many institutions have obviously begun to pay attention to network security issues.

1. What is your mentality when surfing the Internet? What has the Internet brought us? Does online chatting have a greater impact on real life?

In fact, as we all know, many students mainly regard The computer is used for playing games, surfing the Internet and watching DVDs. In the dormitory, I often stay up all night and can't help myself. It is rarely used for studying.

In this case, it is entirely appropriate for the school to prohibit freshmen from purchasing computers for use in the dormitories.

A brief discussion on the impact of the Internet on the growth of college students

The 21st century is the information age. The term "network" has been deeply rooted in people's hearts in just a few years. It has grown from a "new term" to A well-known "hot term". But everything has its pros and cons. While we see the great convenience and benefits that the Internet has brought us, we should also face up to its shortcomings. Especially for college students, the Internet is a "double-edged sword". Once used improperly, it will hurt others and even hurt yourself.

We cannot and cannot deny the benefits that the emerging "thing" of the Internet has brought to us. It is this boundless network that connects every corner of the world, making the already small "global village" even smaller, and enabling people around the world to communicate freely without barriers. We can use the Internet to quickly obtain any information we need, express opinions freely, return home with a full load without leaving home, close a business comfortably at home, and even move classrooms from world-famous universities to To your own home...the basis of everything is just a computer, a phone, and a "cat", and the network will satisfy you with the rest.

As representatives of the new generation of youth, college students are often more sensitive to new things than others, and their pursuit of new things often exceeds that of others. Therefore, on a university campus, if you want to find a college student who does not know "network", it may be an "impossible task." Because of this, we must face up to the network, put the network in an appropriate position, balance the pros and cons, and make good use of this "double-edged sword."

As a freshman, I have also heard of many "typical" cases where addiction to the Internet has led to academic failure or even downgrading or dropping out of school. Most of them are stuck in the quagmire of online chatting or online games and cannot extricate themselves. When they discover it, it is too late and they have to face the cruel reality. Therefore, there was a period when the Internet was considered a public enemy that affected college students' performance, and became the target of accusations from university teachers and students' parents.

As we all know, everything is formed by the interaction of two contradictory aspects. We must look at the problem comprehensively and grasp the main aspects of the contradiction in order to grasp the essence of the thing. The emergence of the Internet is the inevitable result of social development. It is not just a place for chatting, nor a playground for some people. It is a huge information distribution center. It connects the whole world and narrows the distance between people. The distance between them enables maximum sharing of resources. This is the real role of the network. In this sense, the role of the network is positive. As college students, we should keep up with the pace of social development, have more contact with the Internet, understand the Internet, control the Internet, and turn the Internet into a tool that serves ourselves, rather than just using it as a place for entertainment and recreation. This is the real use of the Internet. value.

Let’s go back to the original topic. Why do some people lose themselves on the Internet, causing harm to themselves and others? Why are some college students, both living in the information society, able to make full use of the advantages of the Internet to improve their grades, broaden their horizons, and hone their talents? I'm afraid this is not a problem with the network, but a problem with the people themselves. Marxist philosophy tells us that internal factors determine the nature and development direction of things. It's the same network, but some people see it as being able to chat and enjoy the addiction of "leading thousands of troops in bloody battlefields" and "participating in world anti-terrorism operations"; some people see it as having unlimited sharing of resources. sex. This is the difference between people. Therefore, when talking about the pros and cons of the Internet, in the final analysis, it depends on how we view the Internet, how to use the Internet, and how to make good use of the Internet. Instead of constantly complaining that the Internet has affected college students' learning and hindered their growth, we should reflect on ourselves: Have I really made good use of the Internet? Do I have a clear conscience?

Of course, the Internet is not a pure land. Pornography and violence also have a place on the Internet, and they will harass us from time to time. But we can. After all, human beings are advanced intelligent creatures with subjective initiative. We don’t have to look at things we don’t want to see, and we don’t have to let go of things we don’t want. In this way, we can rely on our own subjective will to reject those unhealthy and dirty things that corrode our thoughts. We hope that one day these dirty things will disappear from the Internet and the Internet will be clean. This requires our joint efforts.

------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------

1. The Internet makes people less communicative === indifferent

2. Improper use of the Internet makes people addicted

3. The Internet causes the decline of Internet morality (such as... …)

4. The Internet exposes people’s privacy and reduces their sense of security

5. The Internet makes people too lazy, which is not conducive to the progress of human civilization

6 , The Internet is causing the law to face challenges, and supervision is difficult

7. The Internet has made people's civilization overly dependent on the Internet. Once there is an energy and resource crisis, human civilization will be destroyed. (Because the construction of the network relies on objective materials such as computers, electricity, crystal chips, etc.)

But one thing to remember is that you cannot say that the network is useless. You can admit some benefits of the network, but you must limit it. A good proposition for you should be: "When the network is used incorrectly, the network will do more harm than good." Try your best to guide your opponent to this premise for debate. If you don't limit your premise, your chances of winning are low. Unless the opponent is very bad