This problem has a key verb-occupation. This is a derogatory term, meaning to possess and use. Occupation means self-use, here is the use of coercive means and measures to take public places for yourself. It is obviously inappropriate.

In the case, it is also unreasonable for aunts to "drive away" their children. The square is a public place, and all citizens, whether they are old people, children or dancing aunts and sisters, can use it for entertainment. It is a first-come-first-served use problem, not an occupation, forcing others to "let" for their own use. I think this kind of compulsory occupation of public places is unreasonable.

I am a member of the garden management department, and our jurisdiction includes parks, squares and other public places in the city. So I often meet people who take up the park green space and dance square dance. In a similar situation, the square is not occupied, but used. But the occupation of park green space is also the occupation of public places, which is even worse.

First, it will destroy the green space of the park. Because our parks are all open parks, many citizens like the environment here. However, in the evening, under the gorgeous lights, some citizens occupied the wide lawn and danced square dance. What's more, hang curtains on two trees and throw them around as screens. However, grass and greening are fragile and can withstand the tossing of citizens jumping around their heads.

The second is to affect citizens' leisure and entertainment. Our unit often receives complaints from the public. Some people occupy the park lawn to dance square dance, and sometimes they even coax them away. Besides, they had a good time on the lawn. They are dancing beside them, loudly and obviously on purpose. What's more, this place is surrounded by a cordon. This makes it impossible for other citizens to make good use of park green space for rest and entertainment.

Like the above cases, it is unreasonable to occupy public places to destroy the greening of public places and affect the normal leisure and entertainment of citizens. It is not only unpopular, but also greatly increases the workload of our public officials.

I think public places can be used by all citizens and friends, not occupied by some people for personal reasons. If necessary, we can negotiate amicably during the use, instead of forcing others to make concessions in an immoral and unreasonable way. For example, when a friend who dances in the square dance needs to use a public place, he can choose an empty area where there are no people or few people, and there are no gathered or gathered citizens around, and at the same time control the music to a decibel that does not disturb others. In this way, you can dance and keep fit, and others can also use public places for rest and entertainment. It's perfect. Why not?