Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Chinese History - Churchill's historical position
Churchill's historical position
Generally speaking, each has his own merits, but in terms of contribution, Churchill is better. After all, Margaret Thatcher was a rising star, and Churchill was a hero who saved Britain in World War II.

Needless to say, the horrors of World War II were extremely extensive. The war has spread to all parts of the world, and the unaffected parts of the world may be similar to the no-man's land in the north and south poles. In fact, if we elaborate, even the Arctic has Russian-built buildings, just for the sake of war. The losses caused by the war are incalculable, but it is in such a tragic war that many heroes have emerged, which is the so-called heroes created by the times. Churchill, as the British prime minister at that time, had unlimited scenery.

His scenery is infinite, not because of the position of prime minister. Instead, he gave the British Prime Minister a legendary position. Although he didn't really go to the battlefield in the war, he fought an invisible war and could control it. Later, after the end of World War II, the Soviet Union was weakened, and Britain, which was stronger than Ma Zhuang, was no longer enough. At that time, Britain's opponent was the United States across the ocean. So the cold war pattern was formed later, which was also a feat that affected the world pattern. It can be said that when Churchill became prime minister, he was a hero of all the British people and was loved by everyone.

In contrast, Margaret Thatcher is not so awesome. After all, she became prime minister in peacetime. Although the world has never been peaceful in nature, she has never experienced what Churchill experienced. Although Margaret Thatcher is also famous for her ruthless means, such as tacitly suppressing Russia without consulting American President Ronald Reagan, she is still not as good as Churchill. Just because Churchill saved Britain, she can't compare with this alone.