(1) Figure 1: Marshall Plan is conducive to the post-war European renaissance. Figure 2: Marshall Plan aims to control western European countries. (4 points)
(2)
(1) Figure 1: Marshall Plan is conducive to the post-war European renaissance. Figure 2: Marshall Plan aims to control western European countries. (4 points)
(2) Factors: International situation: At that time, during the Cold War, the United States and Czechoslovakia belonged to the capitalist camp and the Eastern Group and were in a hostile state. National position: The United States is the implementer of the Marshall Plan and usually affirms its own practice; Czechoslovakia is a third party and can have different views. Time factor: Marshall Plan 1947 has just been implemented. Two years after Marshall Plan 1949 was implemented, the passage of time will lead to changes in people's views on this issue. (6 points)
(3) These two cartoons have certain historical value for studying Marshall Plan. However, comics are works of art, which are subjective to some extent and need more historical materials to support them. (4 points)
Test analysis: (1) Figure 1: According to the pictures and words, Figure 1 was drawn from the standpoint of the United States. It is said that "the word on the word is Europe, and the Marshall Plan is written on the rope", which means that the United States believes that the Marshall Plan is a plan to help Europe's economic recovery and is beneficial to Europe. Figure 2: It is drawn from the standpoint of Czechoslovakia. The names of France, Germany and other countries are written on the rope and wall in the hands of the characters, and a gun is tied to the rope drawn in the painting. It can be seen that the Marshall Plan achieved control over European countries through aid.
(2) To analyze the reasons, we should first look at the difference between the two pictures. Combining pictures and captions, we can get the following differences: the cartoonist stands in different positions (one stands for the United States and the other stands for Czechoslovakia), and the production time of the two paintings is different (one is 1947 and the other is1949); From this, we can draw two reasons: the different national positions and the reasons caused by the two different stages of Marshall Plan implementation; Another reason to consider should be the international situation at that time: the two camps headed by the United States and the Soviet Union were fiercely confronted, and the two countries belonged to two different camps. Of course, they have different views on a problem, all of which are ideology or cold war mentality.
(3) Historical Value: The title requires its historical value according to the above analysis. From the previous analysis, it can be seen that there are obvious differences between the two pictures, which are based on the different positions of the two authors, the different countries they represent and the obvious cold war mentality. Therefore, they can not be directly studied as first-hand historical materials, but only have certain historical value, because both pictures reveal the historical event of Marshall Plan.