Kang Sheng and Guo Moruo were once regarded as Kang Lao and Lao Guo in calligraphy, but Kang Sheng was lofty and aloof, especially looking down on Guo Moruo, a scholar, and felt that he was not worthy to be compared with himself. Only his own calligraphy works can be called the best. He also named himself Lu Chishui, which means that he is just like the old man Qi Baishi. Everyone saw his paintings and calligraphy, and said that although he was too arrogant, his calligraphy works were very accomplished and admirable.

1, Kang Sheng was born in a superior family when he was a child, and he was very accomplished in calligraphy.

Kang Sheng was born in a superior landlord family, so his education is different. He is very accomplished in calligraphy, so Kang Sheng is so aloof. He felt that Guo Moruo was inferior to himself. Although we can see that their calligraphy works have their own styles, Kang Sheng himself doesn't think so. He thinks his works are heroic, so he looks down on Guo Moruo, a scholar. He once wrote a letter to Comrade Froude, in which Guo Moruo was satirized. He said that even if I put a stick between my toes, I could write better than him. Enough to see how lofty he is. But his works are still worthy of scrutiny, which cannot be the reason why he looks down on people.

2. Kang Sheng not only looked down on Guo Moruo, but also wanted to be on a par with Qi Baishi.

The old man Qi Baishi is a master of calligraphy, and his calligraphy and painting are all excellent works. Kang Sheng named himself? Lu Chishui? Does the pen name mean that Qi Baishi is not a bright name? Look at me, Lu Chishui. Let's have a competition. People who know the truth are secretly commenting, but people who don't know the truth still think this pseudonym is so weird. Literary friends seem to have pride in their bones, but they are not.

History will always be evaluated by future generations, so whatever we do will be viewed by future generations. Not only are our paintings and calligraphy works worthy of scrutiny, but our character is also worthy of scrutiny, right?