It's no use complaining, is it The platform intervened in the investigation and ordered the company to rectify, and then the company changed its vest to continue dancing after rectification, and then the complained platform intervened in the investigation again and again. Do you think they dare to really block the accounts of these employers? No, I think they probably won't. You are not the only recruitment platform. If you stand in my way, I'll go to another house. Don't blame me for the decrease in daily traffic on your platform. As for how to look at this matter, I can only say that it is difficult to completely improve the current job-hunting environment, and we can only do it step by step.
The reason for "account stolen" is really low! Job seekers have never been inferior, and employers have never been qualified to judge job seekers. There is a good saying, "Being close to power makes people mistakenly think that they have power", which is true for employees of some enterprises (including but not limited to HR). New employees are handled by them from recruitment to employment, which easily leads to the illusion that "job seekers are just sheep slaughtered by others".
In fact, whether a job seeker can be admitted depends largely on the opinions of the head of the department who posted the recruitment requirements. If it is screened out, it has nothing to do with passers-by. We are all employees of the company, so don't take ourselves too seriously. When HR or other employees in charge of recruitment reply to job seekers on the recruitment platform, please remember that you are holding the name of the company, and every word you say is equivalent to the attitude of the company. Being as outspoken as the recruiter of this company will directly have a negative impact on the company's external image. Recruiters nowadays always have a sense of superiority. They always look down on job seekers from a height, but they don't know that they are just laborers. Before, they just used chicken feathers as arrows.
First, when you encounter this kind of thing in the process of job hunting, the handling methods of alarm and complaint are very correct choices, which can be called textbook level. Just looking for a job, why should you be ridiculed or even abused by others for no reason? If it is insulting in public, it is illegal and should be punished by public security. If the circumstances are serious, it is suspected of insulting.
Second, it is necessary to know whether this recruiter is HR or the company's top management. If it is a company HR, it is basically a negative job with overstaffed people, and it is simply incompetent in terms of work attitude. After all, HR is the facade of the company, and the attitude towards job seekers can show the reliability of the company. If it is a high-level recruitment, it is even more lightning-proof. The top management of the company decides the development of the company, and it is also blind to read the resume and curse the company.
Third, the company posted online that the account was stolen, and then deleted the statement. So far, I have not contacted the job seeker to apologize. To sum up, this company has no sincerity. Even if it is wrong, it will not admit it. Instead, they make all kinds of excuses. Job hunting is a two-way choice process, which does not mean inferiority. By the same token, the company recruits valuable and capable collaborators. You can look at people without hiring, but there is no need to wear colored glasses. If things are not reliable, migrant workers should learn to safeguard their rights and interests, and be brave enough to speak out when they should. Customer service is the window of the company. Whether the customer service attitude is correct, whether the service is enthusiastic and whether the answer is professional directly affects the public's judgment and cognition of this company. Therefore, a compliant enterprise will definitely attach great importance to its customer segment.
The oral expression of the customer service of this company and the statement of the follow-up company fully reflect that this company lacks a certain sense of responsibility and they are not considerate. The company's statement stipulates the responsibility for the theft of direct employment accounts. Is that really the case? Why did you delete this statement later? I absolutely don't believe it's stolen, it's the subjective behavior of customer service, and it's a problem of poor quality and lack of professionalism. In fact, a company is a responsible company if it has the courage to admit its own problems and solve them. Customer service has been suspected of belittling the job seeker and infringing on her reputation. The job seeker can take corresponding rights protection, such as asking the company to apologize.
This person doesn't even know the most basic manners. He thinks he is a stupid official who holds the power to kill, so he speaks ill of himself as soon as he opens his mouth. This "low-quality" must be for myself. The attitude of company personnel directly represents the overall values of the company and the thinking mode of management. If the company is so rude to people who have not yet become employees, you can imagine how bad the treatment will be after employees join the company. Encountering this kind of HR shows that the probability of this enterprise is not yesterday, so let's go!
Some HR for the assessment, for their own performance, let job seekers interview at high temperature, and the results are far from the chat. The online salary is 5K- 10K, and the actual salary is 3K+. I have interviewed many HR positions before, and most of them mentioned that HR needs assessment. How many people will be interviewed in a day? I remember that the highest requirement is that eight interviewers must come to the company for an interview a day, and it is a performance appraisal. In fact, most of the HR recruited on the platform are not professional graduates, especially small companies. Human resources is a course, but in reality many HR think anyone can do it.
The quality of platform job recruiters is uneven, and any professional discrimination, age and gender can be used as reasons to reply to candidates, and then apologize and the platform title. As for how to look at it, this kind of thing will not happen for the first time and will not be put an end to it. The change of the workplace environment is the result of the joint efforts of all parties, not the change of a group. HR should learn more professional knowledge, the platform should be supervised, and candidates should communicate well.