First of all, I have a good attitude. I can't always think that my history is bad. I have to listen in class. In addition, you should read more historical materials and novels when you have time. But I still focus on textbooks. Do more exercise. Don't be afraid of suffering. Make a plan. If you can't finish reciting history in one day, you can't eat or sleep. The conditions are harsh. Be crazy. As for history, what I want to say is that the key lies in peacetime, and it is useless to cram for the Buddha's feet temporarily. Especially for the students who take the small comprehensive test or the big comprehensive test, the usual foundation is the key to winning or losing. I have suffered such losses myself. Wei Xie, who teaches me history, is a very serious and good teacher. His class seems to have a kind of magic, which can attract you tightly. The long river of history seems to be close to us at once under his explanation. More importantly, he can always guide us to think about the relationship and essence behind them through complicated historical phenomena. This is the most important way to learn history. Under his guidance, I successfully studied history in my freshman year. Maybe I was carried away by the victory. Senior two began to be lazy and no longer paid attention to mastering the basic knowledge in time. I just memorized it temporarily before the exam. I didn't realize how stupid I was until I reviewed in the third semester of senior three. As the basic knowledge is solid, I can recall all the contents effortlessly. And even if you read the text of Grade Two for several times, you may still forget it. When reading the contents of each section, we should think about what happened before and after a historical event, whether there is any internal connection between them, and what historical truth can be explained. Historical events can also be compared horizontally and vertically. For example, what are the similarities and differences between two coups or two policies? Why are there such similarities and differences? What does it mean? It is also very simple to analyze similarities and differences, which is nothing more than thinking from several fixed plates such as background, nature and influence. Some books say that history should be studied in three dimensions. I think the so-called "three-dimensional" is probably the connection between horizontal and vertical. If we often think like this, we can analyze the essence of different historical phenomena more accurately and solve any problems we encounter. This is a problem that should be paid attention to when reading. Books are more than just reading. It's no use remembering some times, places and events. The most important thing is to learn to think and study with historical thinking and explore what is behind the incident. I believe you will soon find that the more you read, the more interesting you will be. Secondly, it is of course very important to do the questions. The process of doing the problem is actually a process of review and reflection. Nowadays, there are few historical questions that simply test knowledge itself. This is usually a test of your analysis of an event. This requires the use of the set of kung fu accumulated during reading, and there are also some skills. For example, when doing multiple-choice questions, we often encounter some problems such as "root" and "essence", which are usually analyzed from the aspects of productivity determining production relations and economic base determining superstructure. As long as there are options about these aspects, they are generally correct. In my opinion, the questions of "direct" and "indirect" are actually very simple. When you answer "direct", you can make your thinking simpler. You will be what you thought at first, and you don't have to turn any corners at all. Everything except "direct" can be safely classified as "indirect". Good luck and hope to adopt it.