Breaking the dike: the official language of disaster relief caused public anger
On June 2 1 day, at the critical moment when Katie broke the bank and 65,438+10,000 people's lives were at stake, the host of CCTV interviewed Ping Jun, deputy director of Jiangxi Flood Control and Drought Relief Headquarters Office. Unexpectedly, this front-line disaster relief figure first emphasized that Katie had broken many times in history, and then introduced which leaders, big and small, had made efforts to fight floods. Important instructions? . The host interrupted him many times and asked? How big is the gap? Did the people downstream move? ?
This video was widely forwarded by netizens with thousands of posts. Are all netizens here? Baidu Post Bar? Spontaneous opening? Ping Jun, right? There are more than 400 posts. Some central and foreign newspapers and portals have made severe criticisms. Liu Zhiliang comments from Northeast Network: The whole telephone connection covers everything except life and death, and the source can be seen everywhere. The overall situation of officialdom? Thorough? Only open? Stand firm, can be called? A model of bureaucracy, a model of contemporary civil servants? . Katie community netizen? Pingjiang Garden? Sigh:? Officials have lost their normal speech ability, that is, they can't speak human words. ? Tianya community netizens posted a post to ridicule: "Anger! The director's report on the heroic flood fighting deeds of Jiangxi leaders was interrupted by the CCTV host! 》
After a mine accident happened in a certain place last year, local senior officials also said that the accident happened? It has caused great trouble to the Party Central Committee and the State Council, and we are deeply saddened and uneasy? . Some officials? Can't talk? What is missing on the surface is media literacy, but what is missing on the deep level? Building the Party for the Public and Governing for the People? The political purpose. Netizen warned: in the long run, it is not the river embankment that breaks the dam, but the people's heart. ?
What is intriguing is that the local media in Jiangxi and Fuzhou are silent about this, and there is only one enterprise background? Fuzhou net? On the home page, it was published that "netizens hotly discussed that CCTV anchor interrupted the official public opinion introduction twice", which indirectly expressed people's impressions of parents in the disaster area. On June 25, People's Daily asked: When will ordinary local cadres and masses get in a word directly like TV hosts? Bureaucrats? 、? A cliche? ?
Brother growl? :? What can you do to me? ?
On June 22, the Guangzhou Legislative Affairs Office was? Brother growl? Apologize publicly for the incident. According to People's Daily Online? Message board for local leaders? The post said that 1 17 went to Guangzhou Legislative Affairs Office and Guangzhou Administrative Reconsideration Application Office at 0: 30 am on June/7, and was rejected. Why? After 1 1: 30, it will not be accepted? . A staff member was arrogant and quarreled with him for about half an hour, shouting? I am like this. What can you do to me? , netizens joked? Brother growl? .
There are many comments on the internet: It is our taxpayers who pay government officials. Why look at his face? The working people have raised a large number of civil servants who are free from the sufferings of the masses. Such people should let themselves find a job in the labor market and see what they can do without background. ? Netizens hope that government services may also participate in ISO (International Standard) rating and realize the standardized operation of official windows.
Sohu netizens criticized that the Legislative Affairs Office even took this? Brother growl? Don't want to publish your name, just transferred from the original post, or are you unsure? Sincerity for improvement? . Fuzhou netizens suggested that you can download this recording as a ringtone. Civil servants? The alarm went off.
Civil servant: Is the salary low?
Gao Qiang, vice chairman of NPC Finance and Economics Committee, recently said: Compared with foreign countries, the salary level of civil servants in China is low, which has caused controversy, and the "China Voice", the fourth gathering of G20 leaders, has attracted much attention.
Some netizens agreed with Gao Qiang's statement and posted: A lot? Angry youth? I think the salary of civil servants is very high. Please investigate the situation in the central and western regions. Even in coastal areas and underdeveloped areas, the wages of many civil servants are out of proportion to their efforts. However, more netizens expressed strong doubts about this.
Tianya community netizen said: civil servants say that wages are low and fewer people resign? Job hopping? Yes; Although they cry very hard, they don't believe that there will be any other unit better than civil servants. Civil servants are engaged to let their children take over? Is there less black-box operation? Why do millions of people compete for the civil service exam? ? Don't be ignorant of happiness, okay? ? Some netizens also analyzed that the income of grassroots civil servants may be low. Is it normal to lead to inaction, recklessness and disorderly law enforcement? .
Director resigns: pragmatic officials return government to the people.
June 2 1, One Foundation Research Institute? Wang, the first president of Beijing Normal University, revealed that the audit report exposed the black hole of airline rent-seeking. Many aviation executives have fallen, and the formalities of transferring from officialdom are about to be completed. The fourth gathering of G20 leaders, "The Voice of China", has attracted much attention, causing media emotion.
During his work in the Third Division of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, Wang carried out pragmatic reforms and made many achievements. Since 1988, he has visited more than 1000 villages and guided the operation of villagers' election, which has attracted the attention of the international community. During the Wenchuan earthquake, as the director of the disaster relief department, he frequently appeared in press conferences and disaster areas. When leaving the post of Director of the Department of Social Welfare and Philanthropy, the number of 20 10 charitable organizations and the amount of donations will set a historical record, and the new draft charity law will be passed. Yuan Yue, an expert in social investigation, described Wang in his blog. An official with knowledge, enthusiasm, responsibility and promotion? At the same time, do you think such grass-roots officials in the system? The upside is probably at the top? .
However, ordinary netizens also ridiculed Wang's resignation, guessing which of the two departments, disaster relief and charity, is more worthy of officials? Love stack? . Many people don't understand that they participated in Wang's four-level promotion. Emergency mechanism? How to make the distribution right of disaster relief funds procedural and transparent? This phenomenon once again shows that the people do not know much about the progress of reform within the system, and there is a gap.
When talking about the reform of administrative procedures, Wang suggested that a small improvement on the desks of ordinary civil servants in central state organs can make the Chinese nation take a big step forward. ? After the death of Zhu Houze, the former head of the Propaganda Department of the Communist Party of China, Qian Gang, a famous writer, wrote an article on the Internet: Some old comrades in the Party are concerned about the country and the people and are striving for reform and opening up. Thirty years have passed, and the young reformers are leaving one after another. They're revamping the system? Left a rare legacy? . (zhu huaxin)