Current affairs critics have been praising or criticizing some current affairs with sharp writing. They often have their own unique views on social events and will not change their views easily because the events are beneficial to them. Just like the exclusive admonisher of the ancient emperor, he dared to express his views directly in front of the public.
There is such a social commentator in Taiwan Province Province. Like many critics, his writing style is sharp, full of critical emotions and casual. His witty abuse and angry jokes may all be his own comments on something. Dare to speak and dare to judge makes him very angry. He even claimed to be "the first person in China's vernacular Chinese" and bluntly said that Mr. Lu Xun was not as good as him. I have to say that he is a bit boastful.
Why on earth did this current affairs critic dare to make wild remarks, threatening that "Mr. Lu Xun is inferior to him", and what kind of life shaped his character of expressing opinions? Has his life been affected by his inappropriate remarks?
Arrogance and belittle Lu Xun.
The bold current affairs critic in Taiwan Province Province is named Li Ao. 1935 was born in Harbin, Heilongjiang province, and was from the northeast. Li Ao was born when the three northeastern provinces fell after the September 18th Incident, and Li Ao suffered a lot from life as soon as he was born. In order not to be oppressed by the Japanese invaders, Li Ao's father moved to Beiping with his wife and daughter.
But as soon as their family arrived in Beiping, the July 7th Incident broke out and Beiping soon fell. The family once again lived under the oppression of the Japanese invaders. 1949 Before the outbreak of the war of liberation, the whole family moved to Taiwan Province Province again and settled in Taiwan Province Province.
Li Ao really became a social current affairs critic when he was studying in Taiwan Province Provincial University. At that time, he published some sharp critical works, and even was arrested and imprisoned for it, but he did not give in directly. On the contrary, after he was released from prison, he criticized some practices of political parties in Taiwan Province Province at that time more violently, which paved the way for his later criticism.
Because he criticized current affairs many times, his early language was pertinent, so he welcomed many supporters. This directly led to Li Ao becoming more and more confident in his comments, but he didn't expect his self-confidence to gradually become conceited.
Li Ao graduated from the History Department of Taiwan Province Provincial University. As a student of history, judging historical figures is as always. It's easy as long as you prepare enough materials. Therefore, in addition to Mr. Lu Xun, Li Ao also commented on other famous figures in the modern history of China and published books about Mr. Hu Shi. Not surprisingly, these were published by a person who studies history.
However, Mr. Li Ao is deeply suspected of belittling Mr. Lu Xun's remarks. He has made arrogant remarks like "Lu Xun is not as good as himself" in many public occasions, and even despised Mr. Lu Xun many times.
Criticize Lu Xun's literature and evaluate Lu Xun unilaterally.
Li Ao's evaluation of Lu Xun is more reflected in his direct comments on the style and wording of Lu Xun's literary works. He even thinks that it is totally unacceptable to take Lu Xun's literary works as an example in the literary world. He claimed to be "the first person in China vernacular Chinese", which directly challenged Mr. Lu Xun's position in the literary world.
As for the content of literary works, Li Ao thinks that only some of Lu Xun's works are masterpieces that can be read, while some unknown works are not worth reading. He also criticized the structure of the article. He thinks that many of Mr. Lu Xun's works directly change classical Chinese into vernacular Chinese, so the sentences are not fluent and obscure everywhere.
The phenomenon of Lu Xun's education in Japan and Mr. Lu Xun's articles are far-fetched. He believes that because Lu Xun was studying in Japan at that time, his writing was influenced by the Japanese and his expression was not smooth. Moreover, Li Ao unilaterally said that Lu Xun did not directly express his hatred for the Japanese aggressors in his articles because he was studying in Japan, which is something that a writer with "soul of china" should not have.
In addition, he criticized the emotional color of Mr. Lu Xun's articles. In Li Ao's view, many of Mr. Lu Xun's works are just the catharsis of his personal feelings, and the articles are not supported by many arguments and examples, so they can't reflect the times and express doubts about the feelings of Mr. Lu Xun's literary works.
Therefore, he directly questioned Mr. Lu Xun's identity as a writer. Li Ao thinks that Mr. Lu Xun is not a real writer because of his personal feelings. His novels are mainly short stories, and there are no masterpieces. His literary field is even more single. Li Ao directly doubted Lu Xun's identity as a writer.
From Li Ao's various remarks, we can easily see that Li Ao is deliberately belittling Mr. Lu Xun, and he views Mr. Lu Xun's literary works from a very one-sided perspective.
Improve yourself by criticism, and the words of one family are not credible.
For Mr. Lu Xun, we will not change our praise for Li Ao just because of his own words. Undoubtedly, Mr. Lu Xun promoted the literary world in China, and his pioneering role in vernacular Chinese is well known. The power of his literary works can be felt by every reader, and Li Ao's speech alone cannot change it.
In fact, Li Ao made these "arrogant" remarks, on the one hand, because he didn't have a deep understanding of Mr. Lu Xun's living environment, on the other hand, he wanted to enhance his fame by belittling Mr. Lu Xun and his literary works. Compare your own behavior with that of Mr. Lu Xun.
As far as literary works are concerned, Li Ao criticized Lu Xun for not writing novels and scripts because his literary works are mainly novels and scripts, and others are also involved. As for the Japanese aggressors, because Li Ao directly criticized the Japanese aggressors, Mr. Lu Xun was rare, so he took this opportunity to discredit Lu Xun. While belittling Lu Xun's literary works, he praised his own literary works, so it is very disgusting to criticize celebrities to improve his reputation.
label
Mr. Lu Xun is a people's hero who looks down on a thousand fingers and is willing to be a willing ox. Li Ao is not the only one who can comment and criticize indiscriminately. Li Ao has many wonderful comments, but his comments on Mr. Lu Xun are really one-sided.
Although we pay attention to freedom of speech now, as a critic, we should be quick-tongued, but we can't look at things one-sidedly like Li Ao and improve our social status by belittling celebrities. We should rely on our own efforts to succeed step by step.