Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Today in History - How to treat the final conclusion of Fukuyama history
How to treat the final conclusion of Fukuyama history
The concept of "the end of history" itself comes from Hegel. Hegel saw the end of history from the Napoleonic Wars, while Fukuyama borrowed the wisdom of others and basically changed his medicine. In that era when the banner of the king in the city was changing, he made a big news and was a successful hype. Fukuyama said "the end of history" is the end of the development of human ideology. Therefore, a lot of space and emphasis in his book are focused on the dialectics of subjectivity and subordination, which expounds "striving for identity" rather than economy. Fukuyama is just a popular version of Hegel. Hegel divided world history into three stages: first, in the ancient oriental stage, only the monarch was free; Secondly, in ancient Greece and Rome, only a few nobles and slave owners had freedom; Finally, in modern times, everyone has freedom. The history of mankind is the history in which the world spirit realized its freedom in the form of national spirit. Hegel and his successors believe that history ends with the movement of the world spirit. What the book discusses is actually a topic of historical philosophy, so it is irrelevant to demonstrate that the efficiency of our party's cadre assessment system is higher than that of western-style democratic elections, so history is not over.