Don’t judge your problem like a Chinese teacher, or simplify it...for example, your teacher said, so you think the problem with your lines lies in the ending sound. In fact, this may be a problem that many children have. I feel that the children in the drama take a full breath before saying each sentence, so the first few words are frighteningly loud. However, after saying three or four words, the sound is frightening. It just faded away. As a teacher, he just pointed it out out of habit. Piano teachers often say to keep your hands in shape. Your problem is that your little finger is lying on the keys... In the same way, your real problem cannot be such a minor technical problem. And your own problems must ultimately be solved through your own thinking and practice. It can be simplified on his end, but it must be solved in a complex and comprehensive way on your end.

"The action is too stylized and not life-like enough." Not enough life is nonsense. Please ask the teacher how he defines the life presented on the stage? Is it stylized or more naturalistic? The analysis of actions that are too stylized is as follows. "When scheduling, the rhythm of the lines does not match the rhythm of the body." Scheduling is done by the actors, not performed by them. The rhythm of the lines does not match the rhythm of the body. I basically understand that the problem is caused by the subject's deliberate scheduling. Scheduling is generally a slightly disdainful saying that does not regard the changes in the actor's position on the stage as a means of the actor's creation. Rhythm comes naturally with action. Rhythm is a contrasting relationship between various links that constitute a character's actions. There’s no point talking about rhythm if the action isn’t organic. The action is not organic, the movements are naturally stylized.

?