The Grammy judges, like the Oscars, are all certified by the academy. I remember that you have to have several years of working experience (I can't remember the exact number of years), and then send your working experience and representative works to the Grammy standing organization. If the senior management thinks that this person's qualifications are enough to become a judge, they will be awarded the qualification. Because Grammys are divided into categories, so are the judges. At the time of selection, major companies and singers signed up themselves, and both songs and individuals were classified in detail according to individual items. After the registration deadline, there will be the first round of voting (maybe several rounds, again I can't remember clearly), and the top five in each project will be nominated, and then the final vote will be held. It seems that in the first round of voting, judges can vote, no matter what field they are voted for, but after nomination, each judge can only vote for his own field of expertise, the classical can only judge the classical, and those who engage in jazz will judge the jazz. (I can't remember this, maybe I can only vote for my own category from beginning to end.) On the whole, the Grammy is fair, but considering the composition of the judges, there are more Americans than foreigners, and there are more whites than people of color, so a certain type of music is not to be seen. As for Avril Lavigne, if she could concentrate on punk, she might not be so miserable. She was still nominated in her early years, and she has been declining since junior high school. over~