Although I hate the kind of group leader who likes to kick people, he is not willing to let you stay in the group he created. It is his freedom to kick as much as he wants! Right?

I am also someone who has been kicked. The moment I found out, I was angry and confused, but I just let it go, and I will not trouble the other person because it is completely unnecessary! Even if you kick me, I won’t lose a piece of meat, and the group leader won’t lose a piece of meat, right?

Since there is no loss, it is not idle to go to find trouble for someone, or even take the other party to court. Isn't it a waste of public resources?

However, the status of the group leader you mentioned is quite special. As the president of a people's court and in a "litigation service group", it is indeed inappropriate for you to kick out the group members. .

If you are just an ordinary person, and you create a service group out of love, if any group member makes inappropriate remarks and repeatedly prohibits them, you can kick them out! No one else can say anything, right? After all, if words harmful to society appear in the group now, the group owner will also be held accountable.

But you are not an ordinary person!

As the president of a court, since you have established a "litigation service group", it is equivalent to this group being unfair. If you kick out the group members, it seems that you have violated others' rights. rights?

I believe it is also because of this that the local government allowed the prosecution to be established and transferred it to the Laixi People's Court for trial.

However, if we don’t talk about the law and just speak of personal “selfishness”, I still side with the defendant’s president. I have seen the chat records of the plaintiff in the group on Weibo. He kept saying things in the group that had nothing to do with the founding purpose of the group. The administrator also warned him, but the plaintiff refused to listen and continued to go his own way, with an extremely arrogant attitude. That's why he was kicked.

Since it is a public service group, this group is established for people in need, not for you alone, right? You keep dominating the screen and talking nonsense, what should other people who need help do?

The plaintiff also argued that he added a smiley face after every sentence in the service group in order to liven up the atmosphere.

Brother, do you think you are in a blind date group? It also enlivens the atmosphere! This kind of public service group is serious and rigorous. If you want to sing, are you in the wrong place? If you have something to say, let those who have something to say talk about it, okay?

As a legally illiterate person, I don’t know who will win in the end. However, if this plaintiff wins, I hope the group members can also sue him. After all, he alone affects the progress of a group of people. , this can be regarded as infringing on the rights of others, right?

If such a person wins the case, which official will dare to establish this kind of "public service group" to serve the people in need in the future?