When teaching Ye Fan's The Wife of Yang Lezi, we adopted the usual classical Chinese teaching method. Read the text together for two or three times first, so as to make students read it smoothly. Then, combine the text notes to understand the meaning of related words in the text, and then let the students read it again and again, so that they can understand the content of the text. Finally, the teacher and the students discuss the text together. This seminar mainly puts forward three questions to guide students to think and discuss from different angles. Question: In the two stories of "donating money to Ye" and "persuading her husband to end his career" written in this article, what methods did Le Yangzi's wife use to persuade her husband to "know shame", "donate money to Ye for a teacher's education" and "return to his career after feeling his words" respectively? What can we learn from it? To answer this question, the first step is to find the original sentence in the text, and the second step is to make appropriate induction. But the purpose of designing this problem is not limited to this. The main intention is to let students learn to compare and learn to think independently. Therefore, the teacher should enlighten the students and let them finally understand that in the story of "donating money to the wild", Le Yangzi's wife persuaded her husband with typical examples of "ambition" and "incorruptibility" recorded in ancient books. She compared "drinking the water from the stolen spring" to "finding money without ignorance" and emphasized "finding money without ignorance". In this way, the sheep can be greatly touched, and it is necessary to find a teacher to learn and improve their moral cultivation. In the story of "Persuading her husband to finish his career", Le Yangzi's wife tried to persuade her husband by giving inferences. Once the cloth is cut, it can't be recovered, so it is difficult to sew clothes. It is natural to use this very real life case to compare the truth of academic research, which is easy to understand and touch the sheep. Therefore, it is also a natural ending for the sheep to "return to the end of the business". Through this comparison, what enlightenment can Le Yangzi's wife give us by persuading her husband to "donate money" and "end his career"? What students can understand is that they should read more books, master more knowledge and be good at drawing inferences from others. This makes sense. Teachers can also guide students to further realize that Le Yangzi's wife should be able to tell him "shame" and "feeling his words", that is to say, the conversation should be sincere, not wordy, but straight to the point, talking about the other person's heart, that is to say, to convince people with affection, and to achieve such a conversation effect, the speaker should first understand feelings, reason and strengthen self-cultivation. The second topic of teaching: Le Yangzi brought home the gold he found, and was greatly ashamed by his wife's words "This is donated to the wild". So, is it the best way for him to "donate money to the wild" He doesn't want gold himself. What else can he do? It is very likely that some students ignored the historical conditions at that time and said what they could do under the current conditions, such as donating to "Hope Primary School" or donating to disaster areas. This needs to remind students that thinking must be combined with different historical conditions and specific social background to analyze. Some students suggest that you can post a job advertisement and return it to its original owner. To this end, you can ask students to write a job advertisement, which will be of great interest to students. Remind students to think. What's the difference between writing a notice about finding things and writing a notice about finding things? The former can't clearly write down the time and place of finding things, the quantity and characteristics of finding things, while the latter should clearly write down the time, place, quantity and related characteristics of missing things. In this way, it is easier for students to master the writing formats of the two notices. Other reasonable ways put forward by students should be affirmed. Why "donating money to the wild" is not the best way? Students should also be allowed to discuss in order to broaden their thinking. The third question of teaching: Le Yangzi's wife kept the gold she found for herself, and Le Yangzi's wife thought it was right for Le Yangzi to go home to visit relatives without studying, which doesn't matter. Then, can Le Yangzi still realize the necessity of improving moral cultivation and go to "seek a teacher from afar"? Can he still realize that "returning to the middle road" means "not donating" and "returning to the last career"? What can we learn from it? The purpose of this topic is to guide students to realize the edifying effect of environment on people, and pay attention to their own choices when making friends, so as to learn to deal with interpersonal communication correctly. Students can generally realize that Le Yangzi's ability to pay attention to improving moral cultivation, to "learn from the teacher" and to persist in "finishing his studies" is entirely the result of his wife's timely reminder and sincere persuasion. Le Yangzi should be attributed to his wife's good character, excellent learning ability and bright future. From the sheep's point of view, we can get the inspiration that criticism is not a bad thing. Although it sounds unpleasant and sometimes embarrassing, it is like a mirror, which can always reflect our shortcomings and mistakes, remind us to reflect on ourselves and help us improve ourselves. To this end, we should make more honest friends who dare to point out our shortcomings and mistakes. Their kind reminders and timely criticisms can promote their continuous progress. From Le Yangzi's wife, we can get such enlightenment: to really care for, love and help a person, we must show sincerity, dare to point out the shortcomings and mistakes of our friends, remind and criticize them in time, and we must not speak against our will, lose the principle of being a man, and blindly accommodate their shortcomings and mistakes, which is not conducive to our friends.