What is goodness? Kindness means unity and friendship. "Every household does evil and every household does good." Goodness is the driving force for people to live in harmony and the bridge between hearts.
What is beauty? Life teaches beauty, and gratitude is a kind of beauty in life. Learning to be grateful is a virtue and a kindness! Because of gratitude, there is social harmony and happiness; Because of gratitude, there is mutual goodwill and friendship.
What is true and what is false? Who can briefly explain what is popular? The real thing is the truth of human beings, which is acceptable to the public within the scope of science at present. A fake thing is a man-made lie or something that science cannot explain. I hope to adopt.
Explain what beauty is. Philosophical significance of beauty
Philosophical significance of beauty: beauty is an active activity of people to create life and transform nature, and its realization or objectification in reality; Simply put, beauty is the objectification of human's essential power.
What is beauty? "This is an eternal philosophy, but until today there is no satisfactory explanation. There are many.
Many scholars try their best to solve it. I think this problem is an eternal problem, and its difficulty should be
This can definitely be the same as "drawing an angle into three equal parts with a ruler" in a math problem, but there are differences between them.
At least, many people have been able to explain "what is beauty", but there is no need to solve those mathematical problems at all.
Give up halfway, still have a clue. Perhaps this is the difference between philosophy and other sciences.
Everyone thinks he has found the truth, everyone thinks he is right, but when he hears other people's opinions, he will.
Swinging and falling into a state of contradiction. Its understanding can be varied, unlike natural science.
Distinguish right from wrong. Otherwise, there wouldn't be so much materialism, idealism and metaphysics.
In my opinion, if we discuss "beauty" from a very objective angle, it seems difficult to answer the question "what is beauty".
Simple. First of all, I looked it up in the dictionary, and the explanation I got was this:
Beauty: ① 1, a beautiful adjective.
2, engage in beauty v.
3. Good stuff.
4. Proud V.
Literally, it is obvious that asking "what is beauty" is simply playing us, because there is no answer at all.
It can be seen that the meaning of "beauty" is varied, including adjectives, verbs, nouns and so on. If you ask its adjective meaning,
Then you should use other adjectives to describe it. If you ask its noun meaning, you should explain it in kind.
But if you just ask "what is beauty" without any explanation, you can't explain what it wants to ask.
But at the same time, if we enter "beauty" in any translation tool, such as "Kingsoft", then look it up.
Meaning, there will be a very strange phenomenon. The English word found out is beauty, 100% noun. therefore
I naturally think of the time when Plato, the great philosopher and aesthetician of ancient Greece, put forward "what is beauty".
And what did he mean by "beauty" at that time? Is it as profound as Chinese or as European?
Distinguish clearly between nouns, adjectives and verbs. According to the tradition of European language families, their understanding of "beauty" should only be
Parts of speech are adjectives, nouns or verbs. Because beauty and beauty are very different after all! ! !
But unfortunately, no matter how I put Plato, beauty and beauty on the search website, the result is similar.
Because there are too many beautiful women and beautiful women in an article, I can't tell them apart at all.
With the above questions, I found:: soci.niu.edu/~ Fieldt /dye/forms. ②.
After reading the above article (2), although it was painful, it was all in English, but I finally understood Plato's point of view.
The title of the article, Platonic ②, means Platonic (I don't know if the translation is correct).
Many questions about beauty. According to Plato's understanding, even if everyone thinks that object is beautiful, it is not.
It must be beautiful. We can be sure that this object is beautiful, because we already have the concept of beauty in our minds.
However, in my mind, the concept of beauty is the same as justice and equality. They're just a name. If we treat them,
2
Definition, then we will attach our aesthetic concept and artificial prejudice to it. Plato also believes that the reason why a thing.
Experience beauty because it has beautiful elements, beautiful objects are a manifestation of beauty, and there is only "beauty itself".
Is beauty without any other attributes. Only beauty is independent of everything else.
And exist. So I have this inference: beauty exists, but we can't define it, and we can't compare it, because there is no beauty.
Things can compare with it. We can't define beauty, we can't define it, and we can't use it.
Positioning to make sure that other things are beautiful. But problems have emerged, contradictions have emerged, and many things are really beautiful, although the premise is that,
We ourselves can't tell where the beauty lies. Is it because we haven't found the beautiful elements of that material yet?
But many times we feel that the beauty of a thing needs no reason. In my first class this semester, "Architectural Aesthetics"
In the "appreciation" class, the teacher has said to us: "I don't know where the beauty of these buildings is, but I think it is beautiful."
Many times, in order to explain the beauty of an object, people actually apply some so-called theoretical things to "beautiful" things mechanically.
On the body. For example, the teacher of Architectural Aesthetics and Appreciation told us that this Arc de Triomphe conforms to the golden section, and that
A Greek roof conforms to the golden section, so they are beautiful. This column conforms to 1:8, so it is beautiful. But beauty is the golden section.
Is beauty "1:8" or "golden section", and "1:8" must be beautiful? Because the teacher said,
This is verified by science and ergonomics, so this ratio is "beauty". Really?
Are those who are out of proportion to normal people, such as short people, necessarily unattractive? Then Picasso's paintings are completely out of proportion.
That makes sense. Aren't they beautiful?
Perhaps, beautiful things can be verified by scientific methods, but in my personal opinion, what is verified as "beautiful" is indeed.
To some extent, it is beautiful, but "beauty" is far from being verified by "scientific methods". Even if it has been verified,
West, who can explain that this is the truth? As Plato said, beauty cannot be defined, and only beauty itself is the truth.
Probably translated)
The following are some collected statements about "what is beauty": ③.
Beauty is Harmony-Pythagoras
Beauty is useful-Socrates
Beauty is an attribute of an object.
Beauty is relationship-Diderot
Beauty is the perceptual manifestation of ideas-Hegel
Beauty is the complete objectification of Will Bergson.
Beauty is life-Chernyshevski
Beauty is a sign of success.
Beauty is empathy-Lipps
Beauty is objectified * * *-Santayana
Beauty is a meaningful form-Bell
Beauty is a model-Cai Yi
Beauty is the Unity of Subjectivity and Objectivity-Zhu Guangqian
Beauty is a human concept-Gao Ertai
Beauty is the humanization of nature-Li Zehou
Beauty is the objectification of man's essential strength-Marxist aesthetics
Beauty is life-Yang
Beauty is nothingness-Yan Xianglin
Beauty is negative-Wu Xuan
Beauty is just a skill-Zhao
three
Beauty is the realm-Chen
Beauty is harmonious-Zhou
Beauty is harmonious-Zhang Liwen
Obviously, there are many people trying to explain "what is beauty" at all times and in all countries, but unfortunately, all of the above are true.
Law is only one aspect. Beauty is everywhere around us, and they are all right. To some extent,
They are absolutely right, but this is not what we expected. They just answered, "What is beauty?" They answered.
It's just the inverse proposition of "what is beauty". According to mathematics, only the true proposition is correct and the counter proposition is correct.
Obviously, on this issue, the positive proposition and the negative proposition are completely different. The positive proposition includes all the negative propositions.
Thinking about "what is beauty" is really a bit of a strange circle of philosophy. It is said that philosophy is the essence of all disciplines.
There, almost all the roots of science are linked with philosophy. At the end of Plato's form ② ②, this paper puts forward such a
Say scientific statements, and Socrates in Plato's.
Dialogue is not about particle facts or objects, but about unique S.
Special problems are universal problems. Indeed, the philosophy of high school learning in the past said, "Universality lies in particularity.
And through particularity, there is no universality without particularity. If you understand this, can you put "beauty"
As universality, and all good things are its particularity? If so, it is not difficult to understand why scientists
Will use various methods to explain "what is beauty" or what form "beauty" usually takes (such as the golden section).
So far, I can't answer "what is beauty" for sure, but I still think that beauty is definitely not a substance.
Even if some people say that principle is a substance, I am still unconvinced. No principle can trap beauty.
I still think that "beauty" is a kind of consciousness. Because of its uncertainty, I can't convince myself to believe other statements, but it's nothing.
Anyway, it is very important that we need a pair of beautiful eyes to know the beautiful world. Sometimes not.
I wish I could turn a philosophical corner, feel beautiful and live happily. We can use the computer. Why?
Do you have to know how the computer works inside?
What is true? What is goodness? What is beauty? What is the truest? What is the best? What is the most beautiful? I'll write you a simple, easy-to-understand one.
It's true that you said you would drink water right away, so you drank it right away. This is the truth, the existence of reality is the truth, and you are the truest without a little falsehood.
The advantage is that you drive across the street today, don't run a red light and don't drink. Actually, this is quite good. You are the best when you wait quietly for an old man to cross the road before starting the car.
The beauty is that on the way to work, you gave the breakfast you bought to a little beggar who didn't eat. Whether you are beautiful or not, you are the most beautiful.
The real you seldom worry, because you are real. The real you have a lot of troubles, because you are real (you are troubled by too many falsehoods).
You are happy because of your kindness. You are sad because you are kind (you are sad because there are too many abominations).
The most beautiful you are very beautiful because of your beauty. Beautiful you are sad because of your beauty (because others see the appearance).
Explanation: What is discarding truth and taking falsehood? The report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that the main contradiction in our society has been transformed into the contradiction between the people's growing need for a better life and the unbalanced development.
It must be recognized that the change of the principal contradiction in China society is a historic change that has a bearing on the overall situation and puts forward many new requirements for the work of the party and the state.
On the basis of continuing to promote development, efforts should be made to solve the problem of insufficient development imbalance, vigorously improve the quality and efficiency of development, better meet the growing needs of the people in economic, political, cultural, social and ecological aspects, and better promote people's all-round development and social progress.
Explain what innocence is. (childlike) innocence
[Interpretation]:
1. Jude virginity. 2. Buddhist language. Refers to the novice monk who has received the Ten Commandments. 3. Naive and naive.
Innocence is an inherent synonym of childhood. With the growth of age and the maturity of thought, innocence is getting farther and farther away from us.
Feng Zikai, a writer in China, once said: Children's eyes are straight and won't turn. Yes, we are quite touched by our childhood.
Let's make an analogy like this! If you leave the question "What is your dream" to a child and an adult now, the child will not think for a long time, but will immediately answer "Be a great scientist", "Go into space" and "play around", which seems impossible, and that is the world of children. However, an adult, a dreamer, may say, "In his early years, his dream was to be a doctor, but now he thinks about it, it is extremely impossible. I don't have the patience, and I'm not sure whether I can become an excellent doctor. So, let it be. "
What makes people flinch? Is it really caused by age?
Andersen, a famous Danish fairy tale writer, has written many children's favorite works because of his persistent childlike innocence. The emperor's new clothes, the little match girl and the ugly duckling are all things we know and learned. In the satirical article "The Emperor's New Clothes", we read the ignorance of the emperor, the flattery of the ministers and the innocence of the children. Age is not the main reason. I think the most important thing is the different mentality and the angle of choosing things.
Where to find innocence? Is it back to childhood? That can only be an unrealistic wish. We don't have Doraemon, and there is no so-called arbitrary door and space-time machine to travel to the past we want to go back to. The only thing we can do is to keep a childlike innocence like Andersen.
Fielding, an English writer, said: The world is losing its great childhood kingdom. Once it is lost, it will really sink.
What is the inevitable connection between this and our life? With the great progress of science and technology and the large-scale spread of culture, education can be described as "doing everything it can". Many parents signed up for various training courses when their children were very young. Every weekend or other holidays, when other children are having fun, these children have to put on their schoolbags again and can only watch and appreciate. I wonder what good results "killing" children's childhood will bring. I only know that this makes children lack a proper happiness and childhood experience. This is undoubtedly an invisible hazard.
Therefore, in my opinion, children can do whatever they want, as long as they are properly managed. But that's definitely not doting. Sometimes, being able to maintain a childlike innocence is often the key to success. Because children's thoughts are the purest and truest. This is exactly what our society needs now.
What is Tao and what is truth! What is good and what is virtue? God, seriousness, kindness, morality
Everything is the way to test your mood.
Truth is seriousness, and it is the distinction between good and evil.
To be a good person is to be kind, and everything must have a good beginning and a good end.
Morality, benevolence and virtue, always doing good deeds, will be respected when you get old.
Explain what a production server is. Finished server; Server; Computer network server
Explain what standard score is. Oh, it's a scoring method for the senior high school entrance examination, which is very common in Guangdong.
If you see this, you should understand.
Description of the implementation of the senior high school entrance examination in standard score
The general college entrance examination in Guangdong Province began to implement standard scores in the early 1990s. In 2007, due to the implementation of the new curriculum reform in senior high school, candidates can choose different subjects in the college entrance examination, but the number of candidates taking X subjects is different, so the original scores are used instead. In the senior high school entrance examination in our city, every candidate's subjects are the same, so it is more reasonable and scientific to implement standard scores, which is also conducive to the enrollment and selection of high schools.
First, what is "original score"? What is "standard score"? The original score is the score obtained directly from the test paper after the exam. The standard score refers to a position quantity obtained through the transformation of the original score, which reflects the position of the examinee's score among all the examinee's scores. So no matter whether the test questions are difficult or easy, no matter whether the overall original score is high or low, the overall standard score has not changed.
Second, how is the standard score calculated? According to the principle of educational statistics, the standard score z is the deviation between the original score and the average score in the standard deviation, which is expressed by a formula (upper right corner).
It is the average score of all candidates in this exam; X is the original score of the examinee's personal income in this exam; S is the standard deviation of the test score.
The standard score has the following properties: (1) the average value is 0 and the standard deviation is1;
(2) Fractions are equidistant and can be added or subtracted;
(3) The conversion from the original score to standard score is linear, which will not change the distribution shape of the original score, nor will it change the position order of the original score. Under normal circumstances, the converted standard score z is a decimal, and there will be a negative value, which is inconvenient in practical use, so it is necessary to carry out linear transformation (T transformation) on the score z:
This is what we usually call standard score. The average value of this standard score is 500, that is to say, if a candidate's standard score is 500, then the student's score is in the middle of the exam. Of course, this is done on the premise of the normal distribution of the original score. If the distribution of the original score does not meet the requirements of normal distribution, it should be normalized first and then converted into standard score. The converted score is called normalized standard score, which is what we call standard score.
3. What are the advantages of using the standard score over the original score?
According to the principle of educational statistics, the significance of converting original scores into standard score can be reflected by the following comparison:
(1) A single standard score can reflect the position of candidates' scores in all candidates' scores, but a single original score cannot. For example, a candidate's original score in a certain subject is 85, so it is impossible to explain his score in this subject, because it is related to the difficulty of the test questions and the overall score of the candidates. If the standard of a certain subject of a candidate is 650, that is, the z score is 1.5, and the percentage corresponding to the normal distribution table is 0.933 19, then we know that the candidate's score exceeds 93.3 19%, which is the standardization of score interpretation.
⑵ The original scores of different disciplines are not comparable, but standard score of different disciplines is comparable. Different subjects have different scores due to the different difficulty of the test questions. For example, a candidate's original Chinese score is 80 and his original math score is 70. Judging from the original score, his Chinese score is better than his math score. However, if the average original score of all candidates in this exam is 86 and the average original score of mathematics is 60, then the candidate's Chinese score is lower than the average level of all candidates, while his math score is higher than the average level of all candidates, that is, the student's math score is substantially better than his Chinese score. Judging from the standard score, its language standard score is less than 500, while its mathematics standard score is above 500. Because the standard score represents the position of the original score in the whole original score, it is comparable.
(3) The original scores of different disciplines cannot be added, but the standard scores of different disciplines are added. Because the original scores of different disciplines are not comparable, they cannot be added up. The results of multi-disciplines can only be added when the average and standard deviation of each discipline are the same, otherwise it is unscientific. The average and standard deviation of the original scores of each subject are generally different, while the average and standard deviation of the standard scores of each subject are basically the same. Therefore, the standard scores of all subjects can be added up.
4. Is the standard total score the weighted average of the standard scores of all subjects?
The standard total score is not the weighted average of the standard scores of all subjects. It is to add the standard scores of all subjects according to the weight to get a weighted sum (referred to as weighted value), and then convert this weighted value into the standard score, and the value obtained is the standard total score.
Five, the city's 2008 senior high school entrance examination results are presented at the same time with the single subject level and the standard total score.
The senior high school entrance examination in our city also began to implement standard scores in the 1990s. For more than ten years, it has achieved good results. Influenced by the college entrance examination in 2007, I tried the original score, and the result proved that the effect was not ideal. There are hundreds of candidates with the same score (for example, there are as many as 300 candidates with a total score of 435 in the senior high school entrance examination in 2007), which is not conducive to high school admission. Our city has decided to still use the standard score in this year's senior high school entrance examination, and the results of the unified examination of subjects are presented at the same time as the single subject level and the standard total score. The scores of single subjects are divided according to the standards of single subjects, and the setting grades and the proportion of each grade are as follows:
A+(5%)、A(20%)、B+(25%)、B(25%)、C+(20%)、C(5%)
The general standard consists of six subjects: Chinese, Mathematics, English, Science, History and Society, and Physical Education. The weights of Chinese, mathematics, English and science are all 1, and the weights of history and society are 0.6. Sports scores are included in the standard total score of senior high school entrance examination with the weight of 8% (the weight of sports scores in 2008 was 5%).
Explain what an address is. Basic explanation
[Call; [Name] Phone ... Call.
What should I call her?