Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Chinese History - How to divide the houses of rural families better?
How to divide the houses of rural families better?
Hello, I'm Sister Rong. Sister Rong is from Jinzhou Village, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province. Sister Rong, the house at home was divided, just after the old man died, and then the two brothers shared it together. How to divide it specifically? Let's talk about our situation here

Sister Rong used to have several brothers here, because after their parents died, they all looked at the old house more carefully, which led to the brothers turning against each other. But there are also some, because family is more important, so brothers will not turn against each other.

Sister Rong had a relative's house a few years ago. The old man died, leaving only the old lady and two sons. Just in time for the real estate confirmation, the old lady confirmed the house to the eldest son's name without consulting with her sons. As a result, the second son thought that the old lady was partial to the eldest brother, so he quarreled with the old lady and the eldest brother. But eldest brother feels wronged because he knows nothing. Finally, the two brothers fell out and wrote money directly at the old lady's house. Whoever writes too much wants it, and the second son wants a fucking house.

Another, the old lady has two sons. When the old lady confirmed the real estate, she confirmed the house to her own name, saying that as long as she was alive, she didn't want to see her sons fall out. Said that if there is no future of their own, they can let their sons share the old house by secretly writing money.

In Rongjie's place, this is the case when the houses of rural families are divided. Even if I have three sons, I write my own money secretly. Whoever writes more will own the house, which can save a lot of unnecessary quarrels and contradictions. Is it like this in your place?

Jin believes that the common custom of rural family housing is that children are not divided into women, and this concept should also be changed. According to the law, inheritance rights should be shared equally, including daughters.

My friend Xiao Xia got a divorce certificate, and his wife thought that she should inherit all the houses left by his family instead of sharing them with her sister. The disagreement over this unreasonable request is irreconcilable, so we have to divorce.

This friend's wife is from the countryside. Although she married a friend and lived in the city, the customs in her hometown had a far-reaching influence. She always thought that the inheritance of her friends' parents could only be inherited by her husband, and the aunts had no share.

Before the housing reform, the function of the house was just to live and have a home harbor. It's not worth much, and the married girl will inherit her husband's family's property instead of her parents' property and land.

This historical custom regulates the orderly flow of houses, and everyone's default model has played a role in social norms in an era with no economic value.

(1) Married daughters can also inherit.

After the implementation of housing reform in the whole country, the value of urban houses has greatly increased, generally around 1.5 times. With the implementation of policies such as rural land ownership, the price of rural houses will also increase greatly, and it also has financial functions.

The inheritance right stipulated by law conflicts with the custom. To adapt to the new situation, we should not deprive our daughter of the inheritance right in rural families. On this basis, children with inheritance rights should be divided equally.

(2) Urban residents inherit the homestead. Rural land, including homestead, belongs to farmers collectively and can only be allocated to members of collective economic organizations for use; However, the property is owned by individuals. According to the principle of "the land follows the house" stipulated by law, urban residents can continue to use the homestead based on the ownership of the house, but they are not allowed to rebuild, rebuild or expand it.

(3) don't mess around according to law.

1, children and parents have separated, and children cannot inherit.

The rural areas implement the rule of "one household, one house". Generally, the separation of children from their parents means that they have become two families, because the children already have their own homestead, and the separated children can no longer inherit it.

2, illegal homestead, children can not inherit.

Homestead is built by farmers. If farmers arbitrarily change the nature of homestead and build chicken farms and pig farms, these are illegal buildings and children cannot inherit them.

3. If the child's rural hukou is removed and becomes an urban hukou, the child cannot inherit it.

Now some children have bought houses in the city and moved their registered permanent residence to the city. As we all know, the people who can use the homestead are basically villagers in the village. If there is no rural hukou, the children of this homestead cannot inherit and can continue to use it.

4. The homestead of five-guarantee households cannot be inherited.

Rural five-guarantee households refer to the rural population who have no children and are supported by the village collective. After their death, the homestead will be taken back, so no one can inherit it. We will mourn the COVID-19 epidemic.

6. Part of the homestead beyond the specified area cannot be inherited.

As we all know, rural residential sites are all planned, and the area is the same according to the regulations. If it exceeds the specified area, there is no way to inherit this part. The United States and France robbed the mask, so don't rob the house.

To sum up, according to the new law, rural houses are legally and reasonably inherited and children are equally divided, which has become a financing tool for getting rich.

Now the national policy is getting better and better, especially the support for rural areas is very great in history. Therefore, rural land and houses are becoming more and more popular. Many people now realize that rural land and houses are more valuable.

How to allocate rural family houses varies across the country, and there is no explicit provision, which is generally established. Generally speaking, it is determined according to these aspects.

First, if the whole family is farming in the countryside and doesn't go out, according to the number of houses in the family, they will first give some to their parents to live in, and the rest will be shared equally among the brothers (or more people).

Second, if some brothers go out, go to school and go to work when they are young, and parents also spend a lot of money to pay tuition and get married (or buy a house), the house in the countryside should be given to the son who stays in the countryside (in rural areas, daughters generally do not participate in housing distribution).

Third, through consultation within the family, if the parents make a will, the house will be divided according to the agreed will.

4. If there is no son, give it to the daughter, or share it equally, or negotiate distribution according to the situation.

Fifth, those who take care of their parents and spend more energy should, in principle, get more points.

The specific situation is treated in a specific way, and it cannot be applied mechanically. But in any case, we must honor our parents first.

I'm glad to answer this question for you. If there are two brothers in a rural family house, but there is only one homestead, how to divide it? I summed up three solutions to see if they make sense.

1. If the homestead is in the name of parents and there are two brothers in the family, then the house will live on the first floor, which is easier to solve.

2. One brother inherited the house and homestead, and the other went to the city to buy a house. Some two brothers have lived in the same house for a long time, and it is inevitable that there will be some minor contradictions, so one person inherits his parents' house and the other brother goes to the city to buy a house at the expense of his parents. This way, the two brothers will share equally, so they won't quarrel again.

The two brothers lived separately, and then applied for a homestead. If both brothers want to live in the countryside, they can live separately. One can separate them and the other can live with their parents. Residents can apply for another homestead, and the problem will be solved.

In short, two brothers can actually live separately. They don't need to share land on a homestead, but they can also apply for their parents' land as a homestead, which can solve the problem of common property satisfactorily. Well, these are the three points I summarized. I wonder if it makes sense. If you still have different opinions, please leave a message and discuss it together.

If the average distribution is the best in the case of a large population, it only represents my personal opinion, but we can also refer to some actual distribution methods and consider how everyone's income is. If you have money, you don't have to come in and share it. In a rural family, some people are still very rich, and they are all relatively rich. If they have money, there is no need to join the distribution. Of course, they can't be disqualified, they must be voluntary.

Hello, I am stubborn: how should I answer your question? Every region has its own methods and customs.

I think the customs here are better. No matter how many sons there are in that family, the old house eventually belongs to the old son.

Under normal circumstances, the eldest son will build a house outside when he reaches marriageable age. Of course, the elderly also help to pay, depending on the family situation. On the wedding day, I will naturally go out separately, without taking things from home, my second son, etc. , so there is little talk of separation.

In the end, only the old man is left, so everything in the family belongs to the old man, including the maintenance of the old man. Do you think the old man took advantage? No, the old son "lost a lot" because he was responsible for supporting the old man. The other sons are willing to come and see who will take it back. Of course, most people will do this and will not ignore it.

It's different now. Children are wandering around the rivers and lakes in the city, scrambling to take the old man into the city to have fun.

Generally speaking, national policies are very important. As long as you have the ability, you can earn money, and so can rural people …

Rural family residence should refer to an old house with a certain historical year, which has experienced at least five generations.

This kind of old house was left by our ancestors. It is often a "building complex" formed by slowly expanding according to the wealth of family members; This kind of old house is often a conjoined structure, and the entrance door is shared by family members; An ancestral temple (public house) is used to worship ancestral tablets; Before there were public "kitchens" and "warehouses" for storing groceries, due to rural customs and habits, many daily affairs and seasonal farming needed mutual assistance and sudden completion; Families are often referred to as "generations", especially because the arrangement of seats at public affairs banquets can better reflect the fine traditions of families in rural areas. People who are highly respected in the family are often elected as the head of the family.

The house in the family is based on the men in each family. Before and after they grow up or get married, the family chooses a few people who uphold justice and draws lots for their peers to share. At that time, there was no title certificate for the house, because family members multiplied, which was a natural inheritance agreement.

The old houses of those rural families are just an idea now; The symbolic meaning of hometown is greater than its actual value; Almost uninhabitable, no one really wants to stay. ...

However, there is a deep-rooted saying in rural traditional culture that "every grass and tree has its owner"; As a result, the descendants of the family are unwilling to bear the stigma of "black sheep" and lose their old houses; Therefore, according to the established inheritance right, each family has its own small house of different sizes.

If the descendants of the family want to split the old house again, they can only split it between brothers and sisters according to the house left by their fathers.

In short, the houses of rural families leave us with more hometown complex and nostalgia for our ancestors ~ ~

Trees have big branches, but children have big branches. In our countryside, two or three brothers grew up and got married. Disputes are common in order to divide the house. Finally, the brothers turned against each other, and their parents were old and homeless. This phenomenon of family disputes caused by property division has been maintained for a long time. I am from the countryside, too. Let me tell you something about our housing allocation. Our family is also two brothers. My brother is one year older than me. 15 years ago, the whole family went bankrupt and built four rooms on the second floor. My brother got married that year and I got married the next year. At this time, there was a noisy phenomenon in the extended family. The parents raised the issue of separation, and the family of six discussed it calmly after dinner. There are four houses, two for each brother, two for elder brother, two for the east and two for the west. When parents are in poor health and need family care, they should be shared by the two brothers, and no reason can be shirked. The public areas at the entrance should be cleaned by each other, and neither party can transfer or rent them privately. Then the parents drafted a separation agreement, and the two brothers signed it, and the housing distribution was successfully completed. Dad asked our brothers if they had any objections, but we all said no. Mom said: Today, your brothers will be separated. I hope your brothers are as good as when they were young. Remember brothers, whose profits have been cut off! 15 years later, our two brothers helped each other and Qi Xin worked together, and there was never any unnecessary contradiction. My parents are also very happy.

I like studying and answering questions. In response to this question raised by my pen pal, I consulted various materials and discussed with my classmates and friends, and reached the following conclusions, hoping to help you:

1. If the homestead is in the name of parents and there are two brothers in the family, it will be easier to solve the problem.

2. One brother inherited the house and home, and the other went to the city to buy a house. If two brothers live in the same house for a long time, there will inevitably be some minor contradictions, so one person inherits his parents' house and the other brother pays for his parents to buy a house in the city. In this way, the two brothers will share equally and never quarrel again.

The two brothers broke up and got a homestead. If both brothers want to live in the country, then the two brothers can live apart, one is separated and the other is living with their parents. If the family is divided, another homestead can be built, and the problem will be solved.

In short, two brothers can actually break up the family. They don't need to divide the homestead in one place, but they can also turn their parents' land application into homestead, which can successfully solve the problem of family property division.

How to divide the houses of rural families depends on local rules, and each place has its own customs. As a child who grew up in the countryside, I have some knowledge about housing distribution in rural families.

In the past, rural houses were residential functions and had almost no financial attributes. In rural areas, the division of houses is only a matter for sons, not daughters. Before family planning, there were many children, so it was normal to have more than two sons. When sons get married, it will involve separation and pension. This kind of thing is usually decided early, so let me talk about my parents' experience.

Yaohao should be a common method used by many families in the past. Every son gets married, the rich will buy a new homestead to build a new house, and the poor will leave a room in the existing house. Generally, if you have several sons, you have to have several houses, otherwise it is hard to say that you are a daughter-in-law. After they get married, they will split up early by drawing lots.

Take the family of two sons as an example:

The eldest son gets married, and the second son gets married only for a period of time. Parents have to buy a new house even if they sell iron. There will be two suites by this time. Houses are also well divided, and people who have good suites usually live with their parents and are responsible for their support. At the same time, there will be other elders present at the time of housing distribution, which is very authoritative. So everyone has nothing to say about the lottery results, and there is nothing to worry about.

If the family conditions are good, the two sons will have one set each and the parents will live in one set. Finally, the parents' house will be a little troublesome. In the past, the house had no financial attributes, so it was divided in advance. However, if parents want to leave this suite until they die, it will be troublesome. Because the current house has financial attributes, especially when it is demolished, it is not a small asset, involving not only two brothers, but two families. This matter should be handled well, the family is harmonious and harmonious, and it is common for brothers to turn against each other.

For rural families, the time of separation has not yet been decided. Now, how to divide the house left by parents? Through some contacts around me, I want to express my views.

1, whoever supports it will get the house. For the elderly, this is their best way to deal with it. In the second half of the old man's life, parents know who is filial and who is not, and relatives and friends at home are watching. The old man has the right to completely dispose of his property, as long as he is like a mirror in his heart and can distinguish right from wrong, it is not an exaggeration to give it to his son who will accompany him all his life. Of course, if children are filial, several sons share equally, and a bowl of water is the best ending.

However, I am afraid that the old people will be confused. If the elderly are seriously eccentric, the party without a house can first try to make parents realize their mistakes through the coordination of rural elders and correct them in time. If not, as a son, if his living conditions are acceptable, he can be generous and understand his parents' partiality. Although I have suffered a little injustice, as a parent, it is not easy to bring you up, get married and have children, inherit the wind. It's a bit silly, but good people will be rewarded.

If the house can be realized, it will be distributed in the form of cash. In order to avoid the problems left over by the house distribution, it is best to realize the house and distribute it in proportion. Old people can master the money flexibly, and their children's economic conditions will also have a certain gap. In principle, it is evenly distributed. If the child is not bad and living conditions are poor, appropriate help is also convenient. In other words, it helps children who have difficulties in life without losing the principle of fairness. After a hundred years of old people, children will not turn against each other because of real estate.

Summarize! Now the houses of rural families must follow the rules of the countryside. Fairness is the most important thing, even if it is eccentric, there must be a degree. Otherwise, it will be a lifelong regret for parents to separate father and son and turn brothers against each other.