Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Chinese History - Is Wu Sangui a good guy or a bad guy?
Is Wu Sangui a good guy or a bad guy?
Question 1: Is Wu Sangui a good person or a bad person? When Wu Sangui led the Qing soldiers into the customs, Li Zicheng had already entered Beijing. At that time, Nan Ming hoped to join hands with the Qing army to destroy the Dashun regime in Li Zicheng, and the Qing army defeated Dashun's army many times. Later, Li Zicheng was killed by local armed landlords when he was inspecting the terrain in Jiugong Mountain, Hubei Province. After Dashun was destroyed, he entered the customs and made Wu Sangui the king of the day. 16 1 year strangled Li Yong, the emperor of Nanming, 1673 and Shang Zhixin declared themselves emperor, and died in 1678. As the company commander of Shanhaiguan, Wu Sangui led the Qing soldiers into Shanhaiguan in order to recapture Beijing with the help of the Qing soldiers when the Ming capital fell. Unexpectedly, he lured the wolf into the room, and later hanged Li Yong, the Emperor of Nanming, and became a traitor. Later, he turned against the Qing Dynasty and became an anti-thief in Manchu Dynasty. He failed all his life and can't be judged by good people and bad people. If I have to say it, I can only say that he is a loser!

Question 2: Is Wu Sangui a good person or a bad person? Loyalty or treachery? To evaluate quality, we must first establish standards.

Otherwise, how to evaluate it out of thin air?

If it really reaches what Zhuangzi called "Wuqi"

Even achieve equality as Buddha's land.

There is no good or bad feeling.

So now establish a standard, as follows:

==============

The following excerpt:

Which is true or false. There were several generations of Confucian scholars. Pay tribute to Brother Zhongfeng.

Monk Zhongfeng was born in the Yuan Dynasty, and we should be quite familiar with him, because the (three-dimensional thought) we often worship is compiled by monk Zhongfeng and is a way to specialize in pure land. At that time, some scholars visited Zen master Zhong Feng.

Ask. Buddha's theory of retribution for good and evil. Follow me everywhere. Someone did well today. And children and grandchildren are unhappy. Some people are evil. And the door is right. What Buddha said is all nonsense.

Buddhists often say that Taoism also says: "Karma has no unhappiness". They said, "Some people are good today, but future generations are not." . This means that the world and the descendants of good people before it are not good people. Some people do evil, but the family prospers. The wicked thrive. They said, "What the Buddha said is nonsense." What Buddha said is not true. Take this question to consult Zen master Zhongfeng.

Peak cloud Nothing was washed away. I haven't opened my eyes to recognize good as evil. Refers to evil as good. There are often.

Ordinary people are ordinary people with the naked eye. His vulgar feelings, his heart is unclean, that is, there are still many delusions, no eyes, no truth. [recognizing good as evil and referring to evil as good], the inversion of good and evil is called inversion chaos. [Often], there are not only such people in the world, but also many. The Zen master is polite and doesn't talk much. He just said there were such people.

I don't regret my inversion of right and wrong. And the retribution for hating heaven is pitiful. The crowd said. Why are good and evil opposites?

He doesn't know that he is introspective and doesn't know right from wrong. Instead, he blamed others and said that God's retribution was unfair. People say, "Why are good and evil opposites?" ? The world is cold, why do you regard good as evil and evil as good?

Fengling Zhong tried to explain its shape. One person said it was evil to slap others in the face. It is good to be respectful and polite to others.

Master zhongfeng told them to talk about it themselves. One person said: "it is evil to slap people"; It is evil to beat people and call names; It is good to be respectful and polite to others. This is what the students themselves said. Their standards of good and evil are here. It is evil to call names and hit people, but it is good to be respectful and polite to others.

Peak cloud Not necessarily. One person said that it is evil to be greedy for money. Honesty is good. Peak cloud Not necessarily. Everyone is telling this story, but all the peaks have different stories. Thank you for your inquiry.

Zen master Zhong Feng said: Your standards are unreliable. Another person said, [it is evil to take money for nothing, but it is good to keep it honestly]. It is evil to take bribes and bend the law, and a good official is honest and upright. Zen master Zhongfeng said again, [not necessarily]. Everyone is telling this story, but all the peaks have different stories. None of these standard Zen masters agree. [Ask]. So everyone asked the old monk, you don't agree with our standards, tell us your standards.

Zhong Feng told me. It is good for people. Egoism is evil. Beneficial to people. It's good to slap people in the face. Good for yourself. It is also evil to respect others and be polite to others.

This is the standard of Buddhism. [If it's good for others, just slap them in the face], just hit him and scold him. If you are good for yourself, respect others and be polite to others, it is evil. The so-called heart to please, to curry favor with, to flatter, and so on.

This is the kindness of an old friend. Good for people. Gong is true. Self-interest is selfishness. Private ownership is false.

This will find a real standard. This standard is that it is good to benefit the public and all sentient beings. For everyone's benefit, I want to get a considerable return, that is, good mixed with evil, good is not pure. First, say true goodness and false goodness, and then say perfect goodness and imperfect goodness, mixed together, half full and perfect, pure and miscellaneous, we must make it clear.

Therefore, all the buddhas, bodhisattvas, sages and sages in the world have not thought of themselves, and they are completely benefiting all beings. This is true goodness, and this is perfect goodness. People in the world, not others, we say Fan Zhongyan. Fan Zhongyan's good deeds are true and perfect, which is a good example for us. He never thinks for himself or his children. He only cares about the country and society wholeheartedly, even forgetting his own destiny. We read his biography, he accumulated virtue by himself, his family accumulated virtue, and later generations all know how to do good. I am the prime minister myself. Of the five sons, two were prime ministers and one was an imperial adviser. I can't afford a coffin when I'm dead. Where did the money go? All used for social welfare. Therefore, Master Yin Guang praised him, saying that his virtue is second only to Confucius. His family lasted for 800 years to the early years of the Republic of China, and his children and grandchildren were safe and well-accumulated.

Let's do good deeds today and donate one percent or two percent of ourselves ... >>

Question 3: Is Wu Sangui a good person or a bad person? Winner is king, loser is enemy! There is no absolute good or bad in the world. When he rebelled against the Ming Dynasty, he clearly realized that he was a hero because he knew the times. Later, because of the failure of anti-Qing, he was said to be a traitor. If he succeeds in fighting against the Qing Dynasty, becomes an emperor and manages the country well, then he must be a monarch and a hero in history!

Question 4: Is Wu Sangui a good person or a bad person? Why should the Qing soldiers 10 score? The winner is king and the loser is the enemy. No one who can succeed is a simple good man.

Why did Wu Sangui let the Qing army enter the customs?

1. In the first month, Zu Dashou, who had surrendered, received a letter from Wu Sangui in Shenyang, and Zu Dashou was about to hand it over to Huang Taiji. Huang taiji replied: I have understood. I sent an envoy to see my uncle and granduncle. The general is undecided. I'm afraid the general will miss the opportunity. What a pity. Wu Sangui is vacillating. Although it has not been eliminated, it has set aside a way out for itself.

Second, in the spring, Wu Sangui was ordered to enter the customs and rushed to the capital to resist the fifth detour of the Qing army. March slowly,

When he arrived, the Qing army had retired, but Chongzhen still valued him and thanked him for coming to Beijing to be a diligent king. On May 15, Emperor Chongzhen hosted a banquet in Wuying Hall to entertain Wu Sangui, a diligent king, and presented Wu Sangui with a sword.

3. Shortly after the audience with Chongzhen, Wu Sangui was invited to visit Tian Hong, the ambassador to Vietnam. Tian Hong met Tian Guifei, the adopted daughter of Chongzhen, and she was very popular. At this point, Tian Guifei had passed away, and Tian Hongyou felt very helpless. Seeing that Wu Sangui was highly valued by the emperor, he wanted to please Wu Sangui and invited him to his home. It was here that Wu Sangui met Chen Yuanyuan. In April and September, the Qing army bypassed Ningyuan and went down to Houying, Qianying and Zhongying, and all three cities fell in seven or eight days. In this way, Ningyuan in Wu Sangui has become an isolated city outside Shanhaiguan. At this point, Ningyuan has lost its strategic significance. In the second year, in the seventeenth year of Chongzhen, the Ming Dynasty was in the process of extinction, which made Wu Sangui deeply caught in the cracks between Daming, anniversary and Dashun.

At the beginning of the seventeenth year of Chongzhen (1644), Dashun Army directed at the capital, and Chongzhen summoned all the soldiers to be diligent and ordered Wu Sangui to lead the troops to defend Beijing. Wu Sangui entered the customs from Ningyuan, two hundred miles away, and walked for eleven days. At the same time, Li Zicheng sent Tang Tong to zhaofu Wu Sangui with forty-two thousand pieces of silver, but Wu Sangui did not agree. Li Zicheng went to Beijing, and Chongzhen hanged himself. When Wu Sangui arrived in the rich area, he hesitated and stood still.

Li Zicheng ordered people to send a letter to surrender Wu Sangui, ordered Wu Xiang to write a letter to surrender his son, and sent someone to bring 40,000 silver carts to Wu Jun officers and soldiers. Wu Sangui discussed with others and decided to submit to Dashun. On the fifth day of April, Wu Sangui went to Heyi, Xisha, Yongping, and met his family who had escaped from Beijing. Wu Sangui was furious when he learned that his father Wu Xiang had been captured by Wang's men. Considering that he has a deep hatred with the Qing army, it is difficult to return to the north. However, "Li hurt his father without knowing it, so there is no need to take revenge", and he will be identified after arriving in Beijing. Then I heard that the capital was plundered by Li Zicheng's men, and my beloved concubine Chen Yuanyuan was taken away by Liu Zongmin, and found that she could not surrender to Li Zicheng, changed her original intention of surrendering to Li Zicheng and sought a new master.

Wu Sangui's surrender to the Qing Dynasty may not be entirely due to "rushing to the top, anger is a beauty". On the other hand, the reason is that the Dashun dynasty in Li Zicheng plundered the surrendered landlord class seriously. Although it has occupied more than half of China, completely opposing the landlord class and resolutely eliminating it will conflict with the existing interests of Wu Sangui, the family interests of Wu Sangui and the support sources of Wu Sangui. At this time, Wu Sangui clearly knew that he and his class could not coexist with Li Zicheng's Dashun dynasty.

Question 5: Whether Wu Sangui is a good person or a bad person, we must first establish a standard to evaluate the quality.

Otherwise, how to evaluate it out of thin air?

If it really reaches what Zhuangzi called "Wuqi"

Even achieve equality as Buddha's land.

There is no good or bad feeling.

So now establish a standard, as follows:

==============

The following excerpt:

Which is true or false. There were several generations of Confucian scholars. Pay tribute to Brother Zhongfeng.

Monk Zhongfeng was born in the Yuan Dynasty, and we should be quite familiar with him, because the (three-dimensional thought) we often worship is compiled by monk Zhongfeng, which is a way to specialize in pure land. At that time, some scholars visited Zen master Zhong Feng.

Ask. Buddha's theory of retribution for good and evil. Follow me everywhere. Someone did well today. And children and grandchildren are unhappy. Some people are evil. And the door is right. What Buddha said is all nonsense.

Buddhists often say that Taoism also says: "Karma has no unhappiness". They said, "Some people are good today, but future generations are not." . This means that the world and the descendants of good people before it are not good people. Some people do evil, but the family prospers. The wicked thrive. They said, "What the Buddha said is nonsense." What Buddha said is not true. Take this question to consult Zen master Zhongfeng.

Peak cloud Nothing was washed away. I haven't opened my eyes to recognize good as evil. Refers to evil as good. There are often.

Ordinary people are ordinary people with the naked eye. His vulgar feelings, his heart is unclean, that is, there are still many delusions, no eyes, no truth. [recognizing good as evil and referring to evil as good], the inversion of good and evil is called inversion chaos. [Often], there are not only such people in the world, but also many. The Zen master is polite and doesn't talk much. He just said there were such people.

I don't regret my inversion of right and wrong. And the retribution for hating heaven is pitiful. The crowd said. Why are good and evil opposites?

He doesn't know that he is introspective and doesn't know right from wrong. Instead, he blamed others and said that God's retribution was unfair. People say, "Why are good and evil opposites?" ? The world is cold, why do you regard good as evil and evil as good?

Fengling Zhong tried to explain its shape. One person said it was evil to slap others in the face. It is good to be respectful and polite to others.

Master zhongfeng told them to talk about it themselves. One person said: "it is evil to slap people"; It is evil to beat people and call names; It is good to be respectful and polite to others. This is what the students themselves said. Their standards of good and evil are here. It is evil to call names and hit people, but it is good to be respectful and polite to others.

Peak cloud Not necessarily. One person said that it is evil to be greedy for money. Honesty is good. Peak cloud Not necessarily. Everyone is telling this story, but all the peaks have different stories. Thank you for your inquiry.

Zen master Zhong Feng said: Your standards are unreliable. Another person said, [it is evil to take money for nothing, but it is good to keep it honestly]. It is evil to take bribes and bend the law, and a good official is honest and upright. Zen master Zhongfeng said again, [not necessarily]. Everyone is telling this story, but all the peaks have different stories. None of these standard Zen masters agree. [Ask]. So everyone asked the old monk, you don't agree with our standards, tell us your standards.

Zhong Feng told me. It is good for people. Egoism is evil. Beneficial to people. It's good to slap people in the face. Good for yourself. It is also evil to respect others and be polite to others.

This is the standard of Buddhism. [If it's good for others, just slap them in the face], just hit him and scold him. If you are good for yourself, respect others and be polite to others, it is evil. The so-called heart to please, to curry favor with, to flatter, and so on.

This is the kindness of an old friend. Good for people. Gong is true. Self-interest is selfishness. Private ownership is false.

This will find a real standard. This standard is that it is good to benefit the public and all sentient beings. For everyone's benefit, I want to get a considerable return, that is, good mixed with evil, good is not pure. First, say true goodness and false goodness, and then say perfect goodness and imperfect goodness, mixed together, half full and perfect, pure and miscellaneous, we must make it clear.

Therefore, all the buddhas, bodhisattvas, sages and sages in the world have not thought of themselves, and they are completely benefiting all beings. This is true goodness, and this is perfect goodness. People in the world, not others, we say Fan Zhongyan. Fan Zhongyan's good deeds are true and perfect, which is a good example for us. He never thinks for himself or his children. He only cares about the country and society wholeheartedly, even forgetting his own destiny. We read his biography, he accumulated virtue by himself, his family accumulated virtue, and later generations all know how to do good. I am the prime minister myself. Of the five sons, two were prime ministers and one was an imperial adviser. I can't afford a coffin when I'm dead. Where did the money go? All used for social welfare. Therefore, Master Yin Guang praised him, saying that his virtue is second only to Confucius. His family lasted for 800 years to the early years of the Republic of China, and his children and grandchildren were safe and well-accumulated.

Let's do a good job today ... >>

Question 6: How to say that Wu Sangui's profile is good or bad? We can't judge by good people or bad people.

When the Qing army called, Wu Sangui was originally loyal to * * *, but for some reason, it is said that Chen Yuanyuan betrayed the Ming Dynasty, which is disloyal.

Later, after surrendering to the Qing dynasty, he wanted to rebel, but he was suppressed and became a vassal. He was a very controversial figure.

Question 7: From the perspective of ordinary people, is Wu Sangui a good person or a bad person? A man of complete integrity.

Question 8: Is Wu Sangui a good person or a bad person? Thank you, Wu Sangui. I took a martial arts exam when I was sixteen or seventeen. In the trial record, he said that he was "a little bit of a border general". His teacher, Chen Bangxuan, also called him a "young man hanging seal". According to the history books, Wu Sangui studied hard and practiced martial arts, and he was "always lazy". When I was young, I read Hanshu and was deeply moved by these two sentences: "An official is regarded as a golden servant, and a wife is regarded as Yin Lihua". Ming History records that in the battle between Songshan and Xingshan, Wu Sangui was "brave and fearless, and his morale was greatly boosted", and "Songshan and Xingshan won all three wars". When Jinzhou was besieged, Wu Sangui personally "supervised the rice cart" and successfully escaped the surveillance of the Qing army, transporting grain into Jinzhou during the Spring Festival. Dang Ming recorded that he was "loyal to his grandson, and when he was an enemy, he took the lead and strangled Lu Ban." Wu Sangui's father, Wu Xiang, said that there were three thousand of them. In the decisive battle, Aarif Lee thought that the only possible explanation was that Wu Sangui tried to save his life and military strength. In his view, "Zu Dashou and Wu Sangui, as representatives, became the forces that Ming and Qing Dynasties fought for with their own military strength". This is why Wu Sangui was hardly punished by Chongzhen, which is extremely suspicious. When Wu Sangui arrived in Feng Run, Hebei Province, Emperor Chongzhen hanged himself in Jingshan Park the day before yesterday. According to "Ming Beilue", Wu Sangui felt that it was no practical significance to go to the King of Qin again, so he immediately transferred the horse's head to Shanhaiguan. Before Chongzhen ordered Wu Sangui to enter the customs, in order to refute the rumor that Wu Sangui had the intention of lowering the Qing Dynasty, Wu Xiang once said categorically: "The loyalty of the three guis will not stop there." Whether Wu Sangui surrendered to the Qing Dynasty because of a woman, or Li Zicheng and Liu Zongmin lost power because of a woman, it is clear at a glance who planted more tragedies and regrets. Previously, Wu Sangui was repeatedly persuaded by the Qing Dynasty, but he didn't agree. Because of Chen Yuanyuan's anti-Li, Wu Sangui proposed that "the soldiers from the North (Qing soldiers) should be used to enter the customs to destroy the' Li thief'". The Biography of Wu Sangui, the King of the Day, records Wu Sangui's memories of the decision made at that time after the Qing army unified the whole country: "At that time, it happened that thieves were in chaos and called for defending the capital. You can't have both. It is to learn from the current dynasty (Qing Dynasty) and avenge my father with snow. " But in fact, he failed to try his best to save Jun, and gave up the reconciliation of Li Zicheng, which led to the killing of his father and genocide. He finally got his revenge and reunited with Chen Yuanyuan. After the "San Francisco Rebellion" was pacified, someone wrote a poem in Chuxiong, Yunnan, saying that "if you catch someone, you will catch the road". When Wu Sangui and other San Francisco became bigger and bigger, Emperor Kangxi began to cut it. This fundamentally hurt the interests of Wu Sangui and his forces who worked hard for the Qing Dynasty all their lives. Regarding the way of cutting princes, the young Emperor Kangxi insisted: "Wu and Shang have been storing each other for a long time. If we don't get rid of them early, how can we deal with them? " The situation has become a situation and a reversal. If you don't withdraw, you will be reversed. If it is not preemptive, it can be done. "Aarif Lee think Kangxi ShangKeXi as murder plot is unfounded. In fact, Shangkexi did not betray the Qing Dynasty until his death, and Kangxi suspected that Wu Sangui had been unfaithful for a long time, which was unfounded. Although Wu Sangui valued his own interests, the reason for his rebellion was largely because he was afraid of the powerful Wang Han, which was directly caused by Kangxi's improper measures to recover the vassals. According to the whole record of Pingdian, Wu Sangui's nephew and son-in-law reacted directly to Kangxi's withdrawal from San Francisco. If they obey the order of the imperial court to withdraw from San Francisco, "they will move to Liaodong, and the imperial court will find fault with them in the future, so we can only take the lead! It is better to dispatch troops, and father and son can be saved! "Thus, Wu Sangui rebelled against the Qing Dynasty again, not entirely because of ambition, but more because of the despair of Kangxi's policies and means of withdrawing from the vassals. 168 1 After the rebels in Wu Sangui were completely wiped out, the descendants of Wu Sangui were finally wiped out. In the war, in order to divide and disintegrate Wu Sangui's allies, Kangxi repeatedly made it clear in the form of imperial edicts that he would pardon all the former subordinates and allies of Wu Sangui who surrendered. But after Wu Sangui's strength was completely destroyed, the backbone of these people were cleared of all kinds of charges by Kangxi and Luo Zhi. In Aarif Lee's interview and investigation, the descendants of Wu Sangui's subordinates are still saying: The ancestors have sent a message, and all the generals above Lieutenant General will be beheaded. This is completely consistent with the official records of Qing History. Aarif Lee believes that simply calling Wu Sangui a "traitor" and a "rebel" is only the conclusion of the Qing Dynasty on Wu Sangui since Kangxi. Whether it was Wu Sangui who rebelled before his death or Hong Chengchou who died, when the world was stable and the "Minister's Day" was vigorously promoted in the middle of the Qing Dynasty, most of the former ministers who were extremely sorrowful were included in the Biography of Two Ministers by the Qing Dynasty. " Wu Sangui, who is capricious and forgetful, has been condemned by people. However, Aarif Lee believes that "the full responsibility of war ... >>"

Question 9: Is Wu Sangui's son Wu Yingqi a good man or a bad man? How many children did Wu Sangui have in history? Wu Sangui's children are not recorded in detail in history. Only Wu He has clear information. The rest of the youngest children were underage and died of political struggle, either in Li Zicheng or after the San Francisco rebellion was pacified.

Most of us are familiar with the eldest son Wu, but there are some discrepancies in the records of the second son. The reason is that after Wu Yingqi died in Wu Sangui, he remained anonymous, and there is no clear record in historical materials.

Wu Sangui's second son, Wu Yingqi, followed his father in and out of the battlefield before he was buried in the grave, and went to Guizhou, Guangxi and Hunan, where he repeatedly made meritorious military service. He was also a famous figure in the late Ming Dynasty. But after his nephew Wu? 【 After the title was guarded in Yunnan, there was no trace in the historical books such as Donghua Record, and the Qing court killed Wu after the San Francisco rebellion. Wu Yingqi, such an important person, slipped through the net. It is not difficult to speculate that he is anonymous and hiding in rivers and lakes.

The world can't help wondering whether Wu Yingqi changed its name to Wu Qihua, and the time of seclusion in Lailong 'ao, Wu Qihua coincided with the time of Wu Yingqi's disappearance. Moreover, his son was named, Wu Shilong, which corresponds to the word generation name "Shi" of Wu Sangui's grandchildren. China attached great importance to the inheritance of incense in ancient times. Even if it was anonymous, it would take homophones and similar characters instead. Therefore, it seems reasonable to guess that Wu Qihua is speculation by Wu Yingqi.

After the San Francisco rebellion, Wu was defeated. In order to avoid the tragedy of extinction, Wu Yingqi was left alone to inherit the incense. Wu Yingqi changed her name to Wu Qihua and lived in Long 'ao. Relevant evidence can still be found on his tombstone. The inscription on the tablet is "anonymous, hiding and attacking for a hundred years", which is a powerful material evidence to verify Wu Qihua's accession to Wu Sangui ~