In a harmonious society, since the Han nationality is the majority, there is no need to worry that they can't accept it, because even if they can't accept it, * * * won't be everywhere, because there is no Han nationality, right? Only ethnic minorities are divided and combined. Therefore, Ran Min, who killed many ethnic minorities, will naturally not be included in history textbooks. And if you look at the history textbooks, even if Genghis Khan and Nurhachi are mentioned, have they mentioned their deeds of killing * * *? Not much, not to mention those things at all, only that they have contributed to the great integration of the Chinese nation.
There is another reason, Ran Min's "command to kill Hu" is not very good in the criticism of Confucianism in past dynasties, because he killed too much and hurt "Heaven", Ran Min proclaimed himself emperor, and there was the Eastern Jin Dynasty at that time, so Ran Min was also regarded as a traitor. The right to speak is in the hands of Confucian scholars, so naturally there will be no good historical evaluation of Ran Min, a rebel thief.
Why did you delete Ran Min from the history books? The Five Revolts in China and the Five Revolts in China were the darkest times of the Han nationality in the history of China. * * There is no low status, even worse than livestock being trampled and raped by five random Hu, or even being eaten by two-legged sheep as food. The rise of Ran Min and the massacre of Wuhu saved the Han nationality in Ran Min from extinction at that time (it is no exaggeration to say that the population of the Han nationality in the Jin Dynasty was less than 3,000 w after the five riots in China). Ran Min is arguably a well-deserved national hero, but why is he called a murderer in history?
I am a man personally, because I believe many people have seen the words "ethnic integration" many times in history books. In order to eliminate internal contradictions, the Sui Dynasty, the Tang Dynasty and modern times had to ignore the spirit of national unity. Therefore, Ran Min, a famous hero, did not slaughter the invaders but became a compatriot. Although it was mentioned in history, he could not be rehabilitated because there was not much to say.
The Xia, Shang, Zhou and Spring and Autumn Dynasties achieved the Qin, Han, Jin, Five Dynasties, Sui, Tang, Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties, among which only the Five Dynasties, Ten Kingdoms and Qing Dynasty ruled China, and other dynasties were ruled by the Han nationality every other generation. It can also be said that the history of China is Han culture, and China is Han nationality. But why do we now say that the people of China are the Chinese nation or that those words are national reunification?
I'm not talking about ethnic discrimination. I'm a minority myself, but I think we should face up to our history, whether it's glorious or disgraceful. This is real history. How can a country that is unwilling to face up to itself develop better?
Ran Min has saved countless lives. Why does history record so little about him? Because when writing history, the capitulationism and wimp thoughts in * * * were very serious, and even those who committed treason and traitorous acts mastered the pen, completely turning black and white, saying surrender as national integration and betraying the motherland as conforming to the historical trend. In addition, some current history lectures are neither serious nor academic. They didn't list many events that affected China's progress, but they struggled too much on some trivial matters.
Ran Min is a tragic figure, because he faced the powerful enemy Wuhu and the incompetent Eastern Jin regime. The so-called romantic figures in the Eastern Jin Dynasty are bureaucrats who only care about their own survival at the expense of their compatriots north of the Yangtze River. However, many people in the Eastern Jin Dynasty were praised by later generations, and Ran Min's exploits and struggles were deliberately ignored.
Why never publicize Ran Min, the greatest national hero in China's history? China people know too little about Ran Min, and historians who know him are unwilling to mention or prove that history.
Personally, I think Ran Min is a national hero. Without him, we wouldn't be here today. We have long been assimilated by foreigners. Just like Indians today, we are far from ancient Indians. For foreign invasion, is to resist, at least Ran Min did it, no matter how many foreigners he has, he will, or they killed him.
In that case, if it weren't for Ran Min, we might not be today and history would be rewritten. I like this man very much. He is really talented.
It is said that it snowed heavily for several months when he died, and all the people who killed him went to worship him. In fact, for the Qing Dynasty and the Yuan Dynasty, it was foreign aggression and the Han nationality was bullied.
In any case, we have an obligation to make that history public. Only by facing up to our scars can we be healthy.
Why can't Ran Min go to history books? It is difficult to decide whether Ran Min is a hero or a tyrant. Many people who love history may know him, although Ran Min's existence is just a flash in the pan, so insignificant compared with those historical celebrities who promote the historical process. However, "killing Hu Ling" still left him a controversial stroke in heavy history.
Unfortunately, there is no such person as Ran Min in the history textbook, and the movie Ran Min the Great has also been banned, and no relevant resources can be found on the Internet for a long time. Many people don't understand why future generations avoid mentioning Ran Min, or even enter the history books.
In fact, Ran Min didn't go to textbooks for two reasons. On the one hand, if we want to condense China's 5,000-year-old historical civilization into a few thin textbooks, we should have cut the complexity and simplified it, and picked out the important ones.
There is another reason, because Ran Min's Kill Hu Ling is controversial. Although he stopped the invasion of Chinese civilization by Hu people to a certain extent, he became a tyrant and executioner because of the slaughter of Hu people. Ran Min can't go to the history books, probably because it is difficult to define and evaluate him now.
Is there such a person as Ran Min, the King of Wu, in real history? Why is it not mentioned in the textbook, or even heard of it?
He is a rare national hero of the Chinese nation. He can single-handedly, win 10, expel Wuhu, and return to his nest, so he is qualified to be called a strategist. Being able to establish the Wei Ran regime, courtiers and people can appeal to the people to work hard under their account. Even after their death, they are still remembered by future generations, and they are called the King of Heaven, and they deserve it!
You know, in history, the damage caused by the five flowers in the Central Plains has never been difficult to see. Every invasion almost cut off the light of China's civilization, and He NB hit the cavalry with infantry to some extent! This cavalry is as simple as the German team playing China, but young Ran Min will tell them what a star is.
In the first battle, Han Qi broke the Xiongnu camp for three thousand nights, killed several enemy generals, and beheaded the Xiongnu head three Wan Li;
Fight again, 5,000 Han rode a big break, and Hu rode 70,000;
In World War III, 70,000 Han troops and 40,000 begging rebels defeated more than 300,000 Hu Lianjun;
After the fourth world war, the first defeat was followed by victory, and ten thousand people beheaded forty thousand heads;
In the fifth world war, 60,000 Han troops almost wiped out hundreds of thousands of Qiang border Coalition forces;
In the sixth battle, Murong Xianbei rode 140,000 fighters, with less than 10,000 soldiers, and won ten battles.
The history contains "no moon, no war, mutual attack." Recover Shandong, Shanxi, Henan, Hebei, Shaanxi, Gansu and Ningxia in one fell swoop. The Huns, Qiang, Bian and other Hu people were forced to withdraw from the Central Plains.
And you should know that this is the Central Plains history book recorded in the minority history books, which is different from the Central Plains history book.
Besides, he loves soldiers and protects people as much as he loves children. In 352 AD, Ran Min distributed the shops in the city to the people. Lead 1 000 troops (mainly infantry) to fight for food alone. As a result, it was surrounded by an army of 6.5438+0.4 million in Xianbei. Under the cover of Wei Ran soldiers eager to break through, Ran Min killed more than 300 people and finally broke through the encirclement. However, this brave Zhu Long horse like Ran Min collapsed because of fatigue. Ran Min was captured, and his men were still fighting the enemy until the last man ... Yan captured Murong Ke in Ran Min and dedicated it to Murong Jun, the former king of Yan. Murong Jun laughed at Ran Min: "You can only be a servant, why dare you pretend to be the son of heaven?" Ran Min said angrily, "The world is in chaos. I'm a savage beast, and I'm still called the emperor. What's more, I am a middle-earth hero, and I can't call it an evil emperor? " The world is in chaos, and the second Cao Yi Di is a beast with a human face and wants to usurp it. I am a hero for a while, why not be an emperor! "MuRongJun great anger, whipped by three hundred people, and then sent to liuzhou, beheaded in the mountains. After Ran Min's death, the vegetation in Qili around the mountain withered and locusts grew. From May to1February, it didn't rain. Murong Jun was shocked, sent people to sacrifice, and named Ran Min as the mourning king of Wu. On that day, heavy snow fell on his knees (official records are by no means fabricated).
Mourn for Ran Min, King of Wu, and mourn for this hero who was buried in history.
One-on-one combat is almost the same visually. It's all his men. I felt the same way during the war. Because winning more with less is not the standard to measure the military god, but to control more people, Han Xin has such a high honor because of his words that Han Xin fights, the more the better.
Why should history forget Ran Min, the Han hero of 1 building? King Ran of the Eastern Jin Dynasty belonged to sixteen countries ... and recommended Sir Fenghua's "The Jedi Strike Back", which is a tragic history deliberately forgotten by China historians; Ran Min, this is a tragic hero who cannot be correctly evaluated by future generations! After the demise of the Western Jin Dynasty, there were five chaos in China, and the Central Plains was like a nose hell, with a sharp drop in population and poor people.
As * * * was dying, an indomitable hero Ran Min stood out. He issued a decree to kill Hu, killing Hu million, which was wiped out by the Central Plains for a while, and * * * survived. However, history doomed Ran Min to be a tragic hero.
Soon, the historian who was destroyed by the Murong family of Xianbei, who went south from the grassland, and later controlled by the Hu family was called the butcher of the world. From then on, the conclusion was sealed and he could never turn over.