Pure history is a history that truly reflects history itself. Pure history makes history itself truly presented, and the true face of history itself is presented to people. This most authentic narrative of history itself makes history truly a history of trust in the sense of existence.

The most important thing for people to grasp the history itself is to obtain the conceptual history, which is the sublimation of the history itself, but in this process, people play a leading role, and it is the existence of people that sublimates the history itself into the conceptual history, thus obtaining the real meaning of the history itself. People rely on history in the process of sublimation to the history of ideas, so history becomes an intermediary tool between the history of ideas and history itself. It can be said that the true reflection of history itself determines the depth and breadth of people's sublimation of the history of thought. However, the poor reliability between history and history itself makes history divided into biased history and pure history.

The existence of biased history makes pure history inevitable, and it also makes pure history the only credible history that reflects history itself.

Pure history is to truly reflect history itself, so that the state of history itself can be truly expressed, which will enable people to sublimate history itself deeper and wider under pure history and realize the deepest and widest development of conceptual history. Pure history is the truest narrative of history itself. In this process, the historical narrator only narrates the history, rather than making a purposeful choice or distortion of the history itself. It is only the truest response to history itself, and it is the narrative of historical narrator's inaction. It can be said that in pure history, historical narrative is only a simple narrative of history itself between words, and it is the presentation of history itself in history. Inaction means that the historical narrator does not consider history itself according to his social environment and political situation. This idle narrative is a simple description of the truest face of history, nothing more. The role of the historical narrator in this process is a bystander, not the leader of the historical narrative, but simply describes what happened. As for the sublimation of history itself, it is an event outside of historical narrative and has nothing to do with historical narrative. This kind of undoped

The history of human-dominated factors, that is, pure history, makes history itself the most authentic expression. Under the expression of pure history, people sublimate the concept of history according to pure history, so that people can truly understand history itself, so that history can really play the role of a lesson from the past, and make Tang Taizong's words of "taking history as a mirror and knowing the rise and fall" truly become a reality. Pure history enables history itself to be truly embodied, so the true embodiment of pure history is the main goal pursued by historical narrators. Therefore, the historical narrator must truly realize pure history, so as to ensure the deepest and widest sublimation of conceptual history. So how can we ensure that the truth reflects pure history? We know that history itself is embodied by history, and history is formed by the technology of historical narrators, so it is the key to ensure the realization of pure history, so we should look for the main reasons for the realization of pure history from historical narrators. In historical narration, the most authentic narration of history itself is the narration of doing nothing, which should be the viewpoint that historical narrators should uphold. Narrating without doing it doesn't mean that historical narrators can't understand history itself and express their attitudes, but that they don't do it when describing history itself. Their views on history itself should be another discussion and should not be reflected in history. Only by insisting on narration and not doing it can we ensure the realization and progress of pure history. With regard to historians, Liu Zhiji, a historian in the Tang Dynasty, put forward that historians should have "morality, talent and knowledge" and put forward a straight point of view, which is the most basic requirement for historians, but I think pure history is the most authentic expression of history itself, so historians should have not only "morality, talent and knowledge" but also "righteousness". The "righteousness" here is mainly manifested in.

The purpose is a sense of responsibility, which is the embodiment of the historical narrative it is engaged in. What it wants to recognize and engage in is to tell the history itself to future generations, so that future generations can understand the real history itself in their own narratives, rather than distorted history or biased history. Therefore, "virtue, talent, knowledge and righteousness" are the basic historical narrative viewpoints that historical narrators should uphold. Therefore, in order to achieve a pure view of history, historical narrators should sublimate the four aspects of "morality, talent, knowledge and righteousness" and realize "pure heart, pure heart, pure knowledge and pure will". Only under the action of these four factors can the emergence of pure history be truly guaranteed. The pure heart is to ask the historical narrator to maintain noble morality, and not to artificially influence the description of history itself because of external factors and their own factors, leading to historical bias. Pure means purity of mind, telling it without doing anything, and truly presenting history itself. Pure knowledge refers to having high knowledge, not influenced by the existing historical view, and truly exposing history itself. Pure ambition is to have a firm will, and don't deviate from the direction because of all uncertain factors, resulting in poor historical reliability. For a country, history records the evolution of national time, in which the ups and downs, honor and disgrace are all in history, so the reason why the blades of past dynasties attach great importance to history is precisely because of its reference and its continuation of human history. Therefore, in order to truly take history as a mirror and continue human civilization as the peak of rights, people should not interfere with historical narration because of their own interests, political situation and values, and must let historical narrators truly describe history itself. Therefore, society should create a stable and relaxed environment for historical narrators to ensure that historical narrators can really remember.

Describing history itself enables pure history to be realized. In order to make pure history appear, any rights group should do the following five things: don't regard their own right and wrong as their own right and wrong, don't regard their own values as their own values, don't vilify themselves, don't regard their preferences as their own preferences, and don't talk about history with politics. Therefore, only the right group can take history itself seriously and create a good external environment for the realization of pure history, and this good external environment can also affect the internal environment from the side. Only the combination of inside and outside can guarantee the realization of pure history in historical biography. Any historical narrator should actively create a favorable external environment while constantly practicing internally, so that pure history can finally be realized. But generally speaking, the historical narrator's own factors are the restrictive factors of pure history. Only when his own factors are improved, pure history can finally appear, be presented to people and play its due role, and history itself can be sublimated into the depth and breadth of conceptual history. Because pure history is the final expression of history itself, it will inevitably become the mainstream trend of historical development. This trend is not only to describe the history itself purely and truly, but also to sort out and discover the biased history, supplement and sort out this biased history as much as possible, and reduce the biased history as much as possible. Although pure history is the mainstream of historical development, due to the influence of social environment, especially the influence of political situation, social values and social philosophy, pure history cannot develop in a short time, which is also the most important influence of the existing biased history on pure history. Therefore, we can draw the conclusion that there must be a transition period between pure history and biased history. It is in this transitional period that pure history can be more perfect, can truly reflect history, and finally can truly become the mainstream of historical research and become a person who sublimates history itself into the truth of conceptual history.

Positive media. Pure history can truly reflect the history itself, providing an important medium for people to acquire the conceptual history, thus realizing the role of historical reference and historical inheritance, so that history itself will not be submerged by external and internal factors, and history itself will not be artificially distorted, which may make people seriously misunderstand history. Therefore, the emergence of pure history makes it possible to truly reflect history itself and become the main medium and transmitter of its true face. Therefore, only by truly analyzing and understanding pure history can we truly realize it and finally exert its important historical value in the whole historical development, so that people can obtain a true, broad and profound conceptual history through pure history, so as to learn from history and understand the inheritance of historical context.