That's right. I believe that when you watch "I am a singer", you have already had your own evaluation and judgment on each participating singer. These impressions will even affect your judgment of TA after the singer's performance. So is this fair to music? Second-rate singers with good music, good attitude and good ideas may have a black history, and low value will not be favored because of the audience's impression of their past?
I don't know how many people watch this program because they are busy enjoying the music form adapted by the singer, the application of skills and the performance of the band. Have you listened carefully to every piece of music that singers have worked so hard to adapt? I have to admit that it is difficult for the masked guessing group to evaluate the musicality and skill because of its strength, and it can only be guessed by amateur players, which induces most amateur audiences to hiss. This is the huge gap between the "Masked" guessing panel and the "My Song" judging panel! ! ! But why should we be fooled by the guidance and buffoon set by these column groups? It depends on the most essential and beautiful thing of this program: the shock and charm of the arrangement. Who cares who the original singer of this song is! ! ! Who cares who covers this song! ! ! Who cares who can guess under the mask! ! ! I'm here to listen to the song, and I'm here to see who is the best song king!