Yes, the development of history is very similar. The only difference is that people on the historical stage are different. However, the development of history is constantly developing in these similar processes. From the philosophical point of view, every historical progress is a kind of "quantitative change", and when the "quantitative change" accumulates to a certain extent, a "qualitative change" occurs. For example, after Qin Shihuang unified the six countries, China experienced a "qualitative change" and China entered a feudal society from a slave society; Dr. Sun Yat-sen's overthrow of the Manchu Dynasty was also a "qualitative change", and China entered the Republic from feudalism.

History is similar, because there is little difference between the two regimes with quantitative change. For example, although the Qing Dynasty replaced the Ming Dynasty and one nation ruled China, the "Emperor" and "Six Departments" they used were still created by the Han people. Although it has been sublimated and changed on this basis, the basic form is still the same, and the inheritance of the country is still "home to the world", which also caused the history of the Qing Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty. It can be said that the whole feudal dynasty was going through such a process.