The History of Yuan Dynasty has always been criticized by scholars because of its hasty completion and many fallacies. The main problems pointed out are: copying as you take it, repeating before and after, and losing money in cutting; They don't look at each other, test the similarities and differences, and see when they arrive. Such as biographies of people or events, followed by books, biographies or two biographies by one person. There are different translations of the same proper name. Shi Wen's translation and revision sometimes go completely against the original intention. Official names such as Geng's participation in politics, Tian Situ's participation in politics and Hao's participation in politics appeared in Hequ Zhi and Ji Zhi, but their names were not recorded. According to the case, the chronology of the prime minister was edited, and only his official title was deleted without textual research, resulting in a nameless surname. There are many improper choices in biographies, such as copying inscriptions and family biographies. It is wrong to rewrite the chronicles of cadres and party branches and push the only child for 60 years, which completely confuses historical facts. There are many examples of mistakes in rewriting the emperor without specific temple names in historical materials, such as mistaking Taizong for Taizong, mistaking Taizong for Taizong, mistaking Xianzong for Shizu, and mistaking Shizu for Xianzong. Compilers are not familiar with the Mongolian language system in the previous generation and Yuan Dynasty. For example, in the Song Dynasty, each state had different bugles and county names, but geographical records described the evolution, but wrote that a state had been changed to a certain army or county. Another example is the model ear of Mongolian Khan, who died of "poor account" and was raised by his descendants' concubines to enjoy his old age. According to this list, the editor of The Concubine Watch is listed as the wife and concubine of an emperor. And so on. Therefore, Qian Daxin of Qing Dynasty ridiculed that "anyone who compiles Yuan history is careless and pedantic, and his stories are ignorant", so he wrote "No mistake".