But no matter what kind of explanation, there are undoubtedly many, aren't there? The most ruthless? Only? Worse? . In view of the limited space, I will say one or two historical figures who I think have been wronged.
First of all, the first explanation, one of the representatives, three outstanding heroes of early han dynasty Han Xin, worked as a Ji doctor in Xiang Yu's army in his early years, and later took refuge in Liu Bang as the commander-in-chief of the three armed forces of the Han army. He defeated the arrogant Xiang Yu for Liu Bang and helped him destroy the world. He was the founding hero of the Han dynasty, and his military ability was BUG-level in history. It can be said that without Han Xin, there would be no later Han Dynasty. It was Han Xin who made Liu Bang's imperial career, but in the end, it was? A bird hides its bow, but a cunning rabbit cooks it. Han Xin was killed by Lv Hou at the behest of Liu Bang, but what about that year? Chasing Han Xin under the moon? Xiao He was also an accomplice, and Han Xin was killed on the grounds of rebellion, but is this really the case? You know, before the establishment of the Han Dynasty, Han Xin was already the King of Qi, and he was strong enough to rival Liu Bang. If Han Xin really had the heart of rebellion, why did he wait until the Han Dynasty was established and the military power was taken away? Besides, Han Xin shouted before he died: Destroy or not listen to Kuai Tong? Kuai Tong advised him to rebel, but he refused. It is said that people are dying, and what he said is true. I believe this sentence comes from Han Xin's heart. He may be arrogant, but he is not rebellious. People who were so loyal to Liu Bang and the Han Dynasty were killed in this way, and three families were implicated. This is so unfair.
Secondly, the second explanation is that the representatives Pan Mei and Liaohua Pan Mei, the founding stars of the Northern Song Dynasty, led troops to participate in the Pingli Admiralty Rebellion, Southern Han Dynasty, Southern Tang Dynasty and Northern Han Dynasty after the founding of the People's Republic of China, and repeatedly made meritorious military service. Pan Mei was rigorous in running the army, upright and highly valued by Mao Zedong, but it was such a person who was interpreted as a ruthless traitor by later novels? Pan Renmei! How unfair!
After learning about Pan Mei, let's learn about the next one.
I believe many people are familiar with the saying, that is? There is no general in Shu, and Liao Hua is the pioneer? For this sentence, most people will think that this is? A team is short of experts in handling affairs, so only people with average ability are responsible for it? It means that everyone is right? Liao Hua? This person's understanding is natural, but what does this sentence actually mean? There are no outstanding newcomers in the team, so we should let experienced old talents take on the heavy responsibility? These two explanations are actually quite different. One is? Average ability? One is? Experienced? Therefore, according to the correct interpretation of this sentence, we can guess that Liao Hua is not a mediocre person.
In fact, Liao Hua is not only mediocre, but also very powerful. He was an important general in the late Shu-Han Dynasty. He is famous for his courage and integrity in the army. Together with Zhuge Liang and Jiang Wei, the Northern Expedition made many exploits, and Liao Hua was honest and upright. Such a honest and upright person is misunderstood by later generations as a person with mediocre ability. Is it unfair?