The first step is to make a positive accusation. Tell the interrogated person directly that he has been regarded as a suspect in this case, and then observe the reaction.
The second step is to make up the theme. Make up a story about a suspect's crime, observe the suspect, and guess why he committed the crime and what can make him confess.
The third step is to prevent denial. Interrupting the suspect's plea of innocence and returning to the second step will reduce the suspect's confidence.
The fourth step is to break the rebuttal. After the interrogator has compiled all the criminal stories of the suspect, the suspect may put forward logical refutations, which can provide information for the interrogator and then deal with the suspect.
Step five, pay attention. Trying to get the suspect's attention.
The sixth step is to control negative emotions. Strengthen eye contact with suspects and overcome their negative antagonism.
The seventh step is to provide choices. Put forward a set of multiple-choice questions to make the suspect admit the crime.
Step eight, know the details. Let the suspect tell some details that only the perpetrator knows.
Step nine, plead guilty in writing. Let the suspect tell all the criminal facts and make a written confession.
Extended data:
Generally speaking, many human rights issues surrounding police interrogation are related to the striking similarities between psychological interrogation technology and brainwashing technology. It is considered immoral for interrogators to try to influence suspects without their consent.
In the process of brainwashing, the methods used to make the brainwashed object feel uncomfortable, confused and unsafe are similar to those used in interrogation:
1, invading the suspect's private space
2. The suspect is not allowed to talk.
3. Use two opposite options.
4. Confession as a means to get rid of the trial.
People's Network-Ask micro-response experts to teach interrogation skills.
People's Daily Online-American teenagers overturned their cases after serving nine years in prison under duress (Figure)