First, the inner needs, each of us is eager to know our own human history, always asking "what happened to us, where did we come from?" This inner desire for time and space can fill the panic about the living environment. And history, although a little far from ourselves, is still in this sense. Learning and understanding the sense of span brought by history can greatly lengthen people's attitude towards life.
Second, the needs of life, the role of history is not reflected in a certain thing, nor is it a temporary response with any strategy in the story. It permeates all aspects of people's ideas and lives, just like the "educational function" mentioned by an old gentleman in the audience at that time. To be exact, it should not be an educational function, but a warning. As for history, we haven't lived to know the truth of history. What we can know is the influence of these historical carriers on the cultural field. We know that these people who wrote history at that time had mixed understandings of things, and such understandings were often different from history. Just compared with literary creation, historiography has less ideas, less perfection of echo and more real vicissitudes, including helplessness. We learn and understand history, which virtually enriches our experience. How should I put it? What a leisurely walk it is when we ordinary little people can accept and transform our lives from a historical perspective.
/f？ kz= 19 102 1887