The new webmaster has a doubt, how to see the weight of a website? Maybe many webmasters will say it's not easy. Just check its PR value. The greater the PR value, the higher the weight. Compared with Google, it may not be much worse, but it is completely incorrect for Baidu. It can be said that the PR value has nothing to do with Baidu. If so, how do you see the weight of a website? To help you sum up, you can see the weight of a website from the following points. First: look at the snapshot. This is very simple. Please observe carefully that the snapshots of all big websites or well-known websites are basically overnight, that is, yesterday's snapshots. Most of the snapshots of many new websites are from last week, that is, snapshots are updated only once a week. From this point of view, it is obvious that those big websites update their snapshots every day because of their trust in search engines. However, the search engines of those new websites don't recognize them, so they have to give these websites a probation period or don't trust them, so the snapshot will be updated after a few days. It can be seen that the snapshot update cycle of a website can determine the weight of the station in the search engine. Of course there are exceptions. Second, many people look at inclusion bodies and think that the weight of inclusion bodies is high, and the weight of inclusion bodies is hundreds or dozens. I only agree with 50% of this statement. Search engines will only include your pages, if they think your content is useful, it is true. How much does that include to be weighted? It depends on the station. Now there are two websites for you to choose from. One is the website of CMS, with 50,000 pages and more than 2,000 pages. Is it tall? No, because you let the search engine collect less than 5%. How can this be considered a high collection? . One is a blog site, the whole site is about 500 pages, but the search engine has included 250 pages of you. Is it very high? Yes, because search engines contain 50% of your pages. If I had a choice, I would choose the blog sites of these two websites, because the search engine contains more pages about him. Let's take a look at 1 14la. It's only about 200 pages, but man is one of the three great navigators. How heavy is it? Then why are there so few? Because there are few pages, how can you include so many? Is it? Third: the quality of the article would rather choose a website that updates an original article in three days than a website that collects 30 articles in one day as a link. I believe many people have a deep understanding of the importance of originality. Now many webmasters buy a program to automatically collect millions of pages (I believe many people know Conseil) and collect tens of thousands of pages to come to me for links. I won't change it. This highly repetitive content will be K sooner or later, and it will not be much higher without K weight. Fourth, the longer the site is built, the better, preferably half a year, the best year and the best three years. In short, the older the better. The new station can also be changed, but the content, quality and snapshot of the other site must pass. Fifth: the website type is the best of its kind, and so are the neighbors. For example, for website construction, it is best to find a website related to website production as a friendly link. If you can't find it, find a "computer" as a friendly link.