Occupation is closely related to everyone's career. In China, only by studying hard in the cold window 12 years and passing the college entrance examination can you get the qualification to go to college. During college, many students were dissatisfied with their majors. The fundamental reason is that when choosing a major, I don't understand.
Knowing that majors are the behavior of people who are responsible for their own lives. The college entrance examination is just around the corner, and the students are busy reviewing the knowledge of culture class. This is a very important matter, which determines whether we can enter the admission of colleges and universities. Without this certificate, we are not qualified to go to colleges and universities. Just as important as preparing knowledge for cultural classes, it is important to figure out which way we should take after going to college. Closely related to this problem is what major we choose.
Before choosing a major, we must first understand the major, mainly to understand what major categories there are and what major each category has. Before the second year of high school, the students have made a choice about the future development direction, that is, the division of arts and sciences. There are great differences between liberal arts majors and science majors, which can be seen from the division of professional categories.
Science majors are divided into science, engineering, agriculture and medicine, and some economics, education and management majors are also open to science students. Liberal arts majors are divided into philosophy, economics, law, education, literature, history and management.
After understanding the major categories, it is good to find out which majors are covered by each major category. First, introduce two major categories.
……
What is the most important factor in choosing liberal arts and science?
The choice of arts and sciences has always been a headache, and many people have thought in the wrong direction from the beginning. When thinking about studying liberal arts or science, many students and parents first think of "which is better for future employment, liberal arts or science?" More promising? "In fact, the problem itself is wrong. Because both arts and sciences correspond to many majors, there are good majors, and there are majors that are relatively difficult to find jobs, such as the history and philosophy of liberal arts and the geology and archaeology of science. It is meaningless to bring arts and sciences directly. Moreover, no matter what major, even if it is poor, if you can learn it well, you can still have a good future. Even if you are a good major, it is not easy to find a job if you don't study well.
Therefore, the key question is not which is better, liberal arts or science, but whether I am more suitable to study liberal arts or science. Of these two subjects, which one can give full play to my advantages, which one is better at learning and which one I am really interested in? Only by finding the answers to these questions can we make the right choice.
If you are suitable for yourself, can learn well and are interested, you will get good grades in the college entrance examination in the future, enter a good school, be good at your major and have a broader future. This is the crux of the problem. Without these things, talking about the advantages and disadvantages of arts and sciences is an armchair strategist.
When I was faced with a choice in my first year of high school, I actually got good grades in both arts and science. The head teacher dragged me to the office and gave me two hours of ideological work. She strongly advised me to study science, because she thought science was more promising, and the most important reason was that it was easy to switch to liberal arts in the future. If you choose liberal arts, it is almost impossible to switch to science in the future. But I still resolutely chose liberal arts, because I think my specialty and interest are here. Finally, he was admitted to the Law School of Renmin University of China with the first place in Jiangjin. Now, I am still very satisfied with my choice at that time.
Objectively speaking, most of what my class teacher said about the division of arts and sciences is true. I studied economics as a graduate student, which is a traditional liberal arts major, but many students in my class studied science in high school and undergraduate stage, some studied surveying and mapping, some studied exploration, and even learned aircraft manufacturing. But they can still learn economics well. It is almost impossible for me to study college physical chemistry now. In this sense, science does have a wider choice than liberal arts.
But no matter how wide a person's choice is, in the end, like others, he can only choose one road to develop. I like liberal arts and economics, and I am good at it. That's enough. Why should I have the ability to study college physics? I am now engaged in writing, speaking and other activities, which are closely related to my liberal arts skills in high school and college, and this is what I am most interested in, so I feel very happy.
If I had chosen science at that time, I believe my grades would be very good, but it is absolutely impossible to get the first place in the city. Because liberal arts is my favorite subject, but science is not.
The advantages of science are wide choice, more professional learning, clearer employment direction and less competition. If you study bioengineering, students majoring in other fields, such as economics or bridge design, posts and telecommunications, can't compete with you in this field. But if you study marketing, in fact, almost all liberal arts majors have the potential to compete with you to recruit marketers-although you will have an advantage, this advantage is not as absolute as bioengineering for bridge design.
But this is the problem of science. Your major will limit your direction of finding a job. Those who study bioengineering are almost uncompetitive except biology. Although you can choose marketing, business management and other jobs, it means that the professional knowledge you have learned in two years of high school and four years of college is almost completely ineffective and you must start over. Liberal arts majors handle this much better. For example, I majored in law and studied economics as a graduate student, but in the process of studying economics, it is obviously helpful to have good legal knowledge and legal logic. "Economic Analysis of Law" is also the content I studied seriously when I was an undergraduate.
There is another serious problem in the study of science, that is, if you really can't learn a subject well, then the subject is basically finished, leaving an amazing gap with excellent students. I take the well-known mathematics as an example. It is normal for excellent students to score above 130 in the college entrance examination, but if someone really can't learn math well, then 30 to 40 points is normal. In Chinese, politics and other subjects, there would be no such amazing gap. It is difficult to get above 130 in politics, history and Chinese in the college entrance examination, but it is not easy to get below 80.
Therefore, if you are good at science subjects and have no interest in political history, then you obviously choose science. If the situation is the opposite, it is obviously to choose liberal arts. If you think there is really nothing you can do about chemical physics, but you can't learn political history well, then I think it's best to choose liberal arts, because if you don't learn physical chemistry well, you may be dumped by others for dozens or even hundreds of points, while political history will not be dumped by others as long as you study hard.
As for mathematics, for a liberal arts student, if he has an advantage in this respect, then he can study liberal arts to ensure that he can get a good grade in the college entrance examination. If a student feels completely helpless about mathematics, then it is best to choose liberal arts.
What really hurts are those students with average grades. It seems that none of them are particularly outstanding, but none of them are particularly good. The most important thing at this time is to look at personal interests. If you are determined to study law, choose liberal arts. Although there is no problem for science students to study law, their knowledge of politics and history in high school is very good, which is obviously of great benefit to you in the future. If you really don't like political history, but prefer something objective and simple, and like numerical calculation, then don't choose liberal arts reluctantly. Interest is the best teacher. The longer it takes, the more powerful it becomes. There are other reasons why I choose a subject that I am not interested in against my inner preferences. Even if you can learn it well for a while, you will always feel tired, painful and swaying after a long time.
When you are not sure whether you are best at liberal arts or science, or whether you prefer liberal arts or science, there is a way to close your eyes and imagine what you want to be in the future. Scientists, economists, politicians, architects or others. Then ask yourself what knowledge you should have to become such a person, whether it is biased or extreme. At this time, you will find the right answer.