I'm afraid everyone doesn't believe it, but how much can it be tampered with? And what is our attitude towards the understanding of tampering? Is tampering ignoring the facts? Is it just a fabrication? This is called fabricating history, not tampering. In fact, tampering does not involve a specific historical event, whether it is true or not. It doesn't involve deliberately slandering some people. However, the interpretation of this historical fact is from the perspective and position of the Qing government. It is not a kind of falsehood, but a normal position expression of self-perspective.
Even in some aspects, the position of Qing San Guan is still very positive. There are few positive comments on those Ming generals who took refuge in the Qing Dynasty. But at the same time, it is not slandered, and it is objective in general. Moreover, most of the emperors of the Ming Dynasty were part-time. Everyone has his own hobbies, and these hobbies are put in the hands of powerful ministers, which has become a purpose of following the trend. Every hobby seems to have caused heavy pain to people at that time. Coupled with the large-scale corruption since Zhu Yuanzhang and Judy in the Ming Dynasty. These are historical facts, including that Zhu Yuanzhang was still killing corrupt officials at the last moment before he died.
This kind of situation, the qing dynasty can truthfully record. I don't agree that the Qing Dynasty tampered with the Ming history. It's just that the angles of Ming Dynasty and Qing Dynasty are different. In the Ming dynasty, the Qing dynasty was illegal, and it was a barbaric nation outside the customs. For the Qing Dynasty, it considered itself a legitimate regime and should be on an equal footing with the Ming Dynasty. This has nothing to do with any historical tampering. Just like your father is your father, I can only call him uncle, and you can't force me to call him dad.
In fact, many so-called tampering are due to different positions and angles. He won't tamper with specific historical facts, which is rare. Of course, that doesn't mean he didn't. However, this falsification of historical facts can be corrected through the evidence of other historical materials and archaeological discoveries. However, if the historical facts are correct, but the angles of narration and expression are different, then no one can correct the so-called tampered history. Just like Sima Qian's words of getting married. Since it is a family statement, is it being tampered with from beginning to end? Obviously, as soon as I say this, everyone knows. This is neither objective nor realistic. But since you can allow Sima Qian to get married, why can't the Qing Dynasty, which made the history of the Ming Dynasty, get married? It is also an official history book recognized by later generations. Don't you admit it just because it was written by Manchu?