Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Today in History - Is there really King Arthur in British history?
Is there really King Arthur in British history?
Arthur pendragon (also translated as King Arthur Panlong), known as King Arthur in history, is the legendary great king of ancient Britain. People's perceptual knowledge of him comes from Celtic myths and legends and medieval unofficial history literature, but no one has set foot in King Arthur's real life in large numbers. Legend has it that he is the leader of the Knights of the Round Table, an almost mythical legend, and is called "the king of the past and the future".

The legend of King Arthur began in12nd century BC and spread all over Europe from bard. But first, we need to study it from Wales in the west of Britain. 1066 Norman conquest of England was one of the most important changes in British history, and the story of King Arthur began to spread in this ever-changing land. In Geoffrey's records, King Arthur was the 9th1king of England, and Geoffrey wrote a new role Merlin in The Story of King Arthur. As for the origin of Merlin, it can be traced back to Mertin, a famous Welsh bard.

Arthur's image is constantly changing with the evolution of legends and stories, and eventually he becomes the king who rules Britain, the leader of the "Knights of the Round Table" who subdues legendary knights such as Lancelot and Tristan, and the hero with the highest honor.

The Legend of the King and History are symbols of King Arthur's supreme kingship. Wearing this legendary king of elf magic, all knights bowed down, not only established their own throne, but also triumphed in countless battles.

The historical nature of the legend of King Arthur has always been a controversial topic among scholars. Some schools think that King Arthur does not exist in history, while others think that King Arthur is the almost forgotten personification of the gods in Celtic mythology. Scholars who support this theory often associate it with Welsh etymology. They think that the bear god is usually called "atos" or "Attio" in legends. However, as far as we know, these gods are worshipped by Celts in continental Europe, not by the British.

Another view is that Arthur is a real person. Although some theories suggest that he was a Roman or pre-Roman figure, according to most theories and in line with the collection of traditional myths, he was a Roman-British leader who resisted the Anglo-Saxon invaders from the late 5th century to the early 6th century. Recent archaeological studies indicate that during his hypothetical life, the Saxon had a date. His power is likely to be rooted in Wales, Cornwall or Celtic in western England.

However, the debate about the center and scope of his power and what powers he has continues to this day. Geoffrey Ashe and Leon Frelyon, the most famous figures who hold this view, hold that Arthur should be regarded as "the king of Bretton" Riothamus, who was an active figure during the reign of the Roman emperor Antimius. Unfortunately, Riothamus is a shadow figure we know little about. Others argued that Arthur should be identified as Ambrosius Aurelius. He was a leader in the Roman-English War and won an important battle against the Saxons, but according to legend, this man was more or less active than Arthur. Therefore, some people claim that Arthur is Brosius's adjutant and may succeed him as leader. According to medieval legend, he was a fighter in the 6th century, supported Christianity, led the English tribe to defeat the Saxon invaders, died in the battle of kamran around 539, and was buried in Glastonbury. There is a saying that King Arthur was betrayed by his subordinates, the throne was usurped, and finally he died of depression.