The indigenous residents may not accept it. People who buy new houses in this place may feel that this place makes them feel uncomfortable, but it really doesn't violate any laws, because no one stipulates that such places can't be built opposite the community. This is legal and reasonable. I didn't break the law, and I didn't say there was any false propaganda. Everyone has the geographical location, apartment infrastructure, surrounding supermarket parks and subway bus stops that the community has publicized before, and there is nothing wrong with what others have publicized, which is not false propaganda. As for the facilities with any negative influence around, people didn't say that at that time.
Just because people didn't say it at that time doesn't mean they didn't say it. This is an easy thing to understand. When the developer sold the house, he must have boasted of all kinds of good places. He won't say anything bad. This is normal. So before buying a house, you should know in advance what is wrong with him near this community, such as historical reasons, whether there have been any tragedies, and what did this place do before the community was built? Is there anything bad around the community? Shops that make you uncomfortable are invisible. Shops are a reasonable and legal business, and selling houses is also reasonable and legal, but one question is whether property buyers can accept it.
We can not accept it, but the house has been bought and the money has been paid, and then it is meaningless to say that their propaganda involves false propaganda, and the developer will certainly not admit it. After all, people's business is legal, and normal business is at best a contradiction and dispute, but it is difficult to solve.