Second, the "translation" of cultural language.

Under such a political and cultural background, the "historical construction" of literary history can be divided into "mainstream" and "non-mainstream". "Non-mainstream" writers are gradually eliminated in the process of continuous filtering and criticism. In fact, this "historical" narrative is not only to construct the subjectivity of modern literature, but also has important practical significance: "non-mainstream" literature will no longer be treated as literary heritage, and other literary trends and phenomena, except revolutionary literature and progressive literature, will no longer be valued because of their illegality, nor will they be inherited and developed. After entering the Republic, the purity of literary production and the rejection and criticism of pluralistic tendencies confirmed the practical significance of this "construction". The construction process of "historicization" of modern literary history is the construction process of contemporary literary history, and the narrative of recent literary history is not without boundaries. This boundary is constantly clarified and demarcated, and it is also a process in which the history of contemporary literature is "clearly" presented and gained legitimacy.