Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Today in History - Wang Dongyue's explanation of how China people exegesis?
Wang Dongyue's explanation of how China people exegesis?
Mr Wang Dongyue is probably the most famous "philosopher" in China today. However, most people in China can't escape an iron law. Once they have enough fame, the trouble is not far away. It is absolutely impossible for countless celebrities to praise and not slander. On the contrary, the louder the title, the louder the praise and the more the slander; So in China, the reputation of the world and the destruction of the world probably happen at the same time, and no one in China can be excluded.

Mr. Wang Dongyue is obviously from China, so Mr. Dongyue is no exception; It's just that Mr. Dongyue probably doesn't care about these. At this point, Mr. Dongyue is also a "China native". However, even if Mr. Dongyue is from China, it does not prevent his "works" from being from China. Not only that, I said that Wang Dongyue and his "theory" were neither China nor a master of philosophy.

Open the application to view high-definition images.

Mr Wang Dongyue.

*********

1, without China.

The most difficult thing in this world is probably to discuss and prove what it is or not. It is even more difficult to prove the assertion that there is no China. Confucius said at the beginning that "righteousness and virtue are like China, and China is", but this assertion obviously cannot be used as a standard for entering this assertion. When I say China or not in China, it is generally similar to what we usually say: "XXX is a typical China person and XXX is a typical Sichuanese". It is understandable that it is inappropriate to make a strict definition. I don't prove that Mr. Dongyue and his theory are not China's conclusions, but only a few typical examples. Please also understand:

Typical example 1: Mr. Dong Yue said, "Retirees do nothing for real, pragmatists do nothing for nothing, and virtual is more important than real."

I believe many people were shocked and impressed when they first heard this sentence. The more they think about it, the more it makes sense. On second thought, they still think it makes sense. Actually ... me too; And I have been influenced by this sentence for half a year after hearing this sentence, and I have the impulse to completely retreat. However, one day, I suddenly found that this sentence seemed wrong. At least, this sentence is "very un-China" and can be expressed in modern language as "not in line with China's national conditions".

China people will say: Yin is within Yang, not the opposite of Yang. In other words, the virtual is within the real, not the real right;

China people will say: color is empty, and empty is color; That is, virtual is real, and real is virtual;

China people will say: Retreat for the body and be pragmatic for the use.

China people will never say that a quitter can't be pragmatic, and China people will never say that what is empty is more important than what is real.

China people have a way of thinking that other nationalities can't understand. In the eyes of China people, Yin and Yang are not two but one, so China people are pragmatic and pragmatic. They can be pragmatic, pragmatic at the same time, and sometimes pragmatic at the same time. They won't fall behind if they don't forget to be pragmatic when they retire. Retreat is beneficial to pragmatism, which is the basis and condition of retreat.

This is the case in Han Changli, Zhou Lian Creek and Wang Shouren.

Academic standard work