Should God of Wealth take drugs be denied?
Talent and virtue are two sides of a person, just like two sides of a coin. Under normal circumstances, people's two sides are balanced, just like an ordinary coin, but sometimes, a person with talent but no virtue, or with virtue but no talent, is just like a coin, with one side shining and one side rusty. The metaphor of this coin suddenly reminds me of someone. This is the villain in Batman, the two-faced man. He can be regarded as an extreme reaction of virtue and talent. On the one hand, he is a wicked man with high IQ; On the other hand, he is the district attorney of Gotham. Together with Gotham Sheriff Gordon and Batman, he became an iron triangle against Gotham. He has a coin with shiny silver on one side and scratches on the other. That coin is the only criterion for him to do things. No matter what he does, he will flip a coin to decide. The shiny silver side is good, and the scratched side is evil. I won't elaborate on this story, but it suddenly occurred to me that he himself is a particularly brilliant tragic figure in Batman. If you are interested in the details, please search for them yourself. The person I really want to say this answer is Guo Jia. Judging a person should be like this, judging talent and virtue separately, just like God of Wealth Ning, I appreciate his talent as a screenwriter. His dark history, which was written in the script of Wulin Legend, but no one dared to film it, is the greatest embodiment of his talent. For details of black history, please refer to this answer: What are the details of Legend of Wulin? -[Reset] Answer-Zhihu's philosophical speculation in this paragraph Frankly speaking, there may be many old professors who are candidly admit defeat. The God of Wealth would rather not only speculate, but also make up a script. Frankly, I really doubt that he wrote it after taking drugs. How do ordinary people write? Only from this point can we realize the talent of God of Wealth Ning. But morally speaking, the God of Wealth would rather take drugs, sorry, one-vote veto, and I remember that he once said that drug abuse is normal, which deserves more criticism. So, how should Caishenning judge? In my humble opinion, my judgment is that talent is brilliant and virtue is lacking. Admire his talent and deny his virtue. But the old professor at the main school said, "What good TV series does he think a drug addict will make?" . Sorry, I don't agree. It should be said that it is thoughtless to judge the level of talents by virtue standards.