Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Today in History - Some people think that the "glorious revolution" is a compromise and a retrogression of history; Some people think it is a progressive bourgeois revolution. How do you think it should be evaluated?
Some people think that the "glorious revolution" is a compromise and a retrogression of history; Some people think it is a progressive bourgeois revolution. How do you think it should be evaluated?
(1) is a progressive bourgeois revolution. (2) Reasons: ① On the surface, it is a compromise to feudal nobles, but this compromise is necessary and measured. The ruling position of the bourgeoisie was finally established, which marked the completion of the bourgeois revolution; (3) avoid social unrest and create a good environment for the development of capitalism; (4) Provide political premise for the establishment of constitutional monarchy.

This topic mainly examines the evaluation of the "glorious revolution". We should not only look at appearances, but also evaluate them from the perspective of historical development. On the surface, it is a compromise between the bourgeoisie and new noble and the king, but in essence, it should be analyzed from the class nature of the bourgeoisie and new noble who launched the coup and the influence of the "glorious revolution" on Britain.