Takesuke Kanda is a member of the Mukden Secret Service. Under the command of Colonel Hanoi, he participated in the Huanggutun incident and was responsible for taking photos.
As for saying that Huanggutun was built by the Soviet Union, it is a fable. Only see the place.
What is the hard evidence of Russian scholar ProHohloff who put forward this "new statement"? According to reports, in an interview with the reporter of Sankei Shimbun, the novelist first stated that his views were not based on the secret files that were not published by the Soviet Union or the intelligence agencies, but only through a "comprehensive analysis" of the military memoirs or interview records published during the Soviet period and the official documents and files published after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and that "Zhang was almost certainly bombed by the Soviet intelligence agencies". It is clear here that by his own admission, Hohloff has no files, no basis and no evidence, and his views are the result of his personal "analysis", which is a guess and a guess.
ProHohloff told the reporter of Sankei Shimbun that Zhang and the Soviet Union had a dispute over the use of the Northeast Railway in China, and the Soviet government was still worried about it, so it ordered the Soviet Intelligence Agency to assassinate Zhang. The first assassination plan of Soviet agents was to plant a bomb in Zhang's official residence, but because Zhang's agents got wind of it in advance, they arrested them when they handed over the bomb.
ProHohloff said that since then, Zhang Cai has taken many actions hostile to the Soviet Union. From 65438 to 0928, Zhang was weakened by years of war and began to negotiate with the Japanese in an attempt to establish an anti-Soviet "independent Republic of Manchuria" in northeast China with the support of the Japanese government. After learning about this, the Soviet Union decided to assassinate Zhang again, thus creating the Huanggutun bombing.
Platts described above, such as "planting a bomb in Zhang's official residence", "establishing an independent Manchu Republic" and "thus creating the bombing of Huanggutun". It's all fabricated by this novelist.
What is the attitude of Russian historians towards ProHohloff's absurd theory of bombing Zhang? China's Global Times correspondent in Russia interviewed Ms Mirovikaya, an expert in Far East history at the Far East Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences. She said that she had never heard of ProHohloff. This shows that Hohloff is not an expert in studying the history of the Far East and China. For Hohloff's point of view, she also made it clear that she couldn't agree with it at all. She made it very clear that according to the available evidence, 1928 was a train bombing by Japanese soldiers in Huanggutun, killing Zhang. This is certain in Russian history books, and there is no doubt about it. The book History of China, published in 2004 and co-edited by Russian historian V. Adamchik and other famous scholars, clearly records: "Zhang was killed by the Japanese army on his way to Shenyang."