Analysis: This question examines the understanding of the reasons for the commercial development in the Song Dynasty. According to the information and knowledge provided by the materials, it can be considered from the aspects of income increase, foreign trade and military affairs.
A: increase fiscal revenue; Promote trade development; Enhance military strength.
(2) According to the materials II, III and IV and the knowledge learned, analyze the influence of tea trade on commodity economy in Song Dynasty. (4 points)
Analysis: This topic examines the mastery of the influence of commercial development in the Song Dynasty. According to the second, third and fourth materials, we can answer from the aspects of money, market, commercial city, citizen life and the emergence of merchant groups.
A: Promote the circulation of paper money; The rise of economic towns; Prosperity of urban commerce (prosperity of street life); Regional businessmen appeared.
(3) A large number of teahouses and tile houses have mushroomed, which is a new atmosphere created in the Song Dynasty. Combined with the knowledge learned, this paper explains the new changes of urban commercial layout, thought and literature in Song Dynasty. (3 points)
Analysis: This topic examines the understanding of the relationship between business development and architecture, thought and culture. From the commercial layout, we can see that the housing market system since the Tang Dynasty has been broken, and the commercial area and residential area are together; Ideologically: Neo-Confucianism appeared; In terms of literature, there are Song Ci poems that reflect the lives of ordinary people.
A: Urban commercial layout: breaking the boundaries of city squares;
Thought: a conceptual system (Neo-Confucianism) with "reason" or "natural justice" as the core has emerged;
Literature: There is a new genre (Song Ci) that is easier to express feelings and express life in the city.
This is a test of tea. This year, Anhui paper also has 13 questions, and Beijing paper has 37 questions. I don't know why tea is favored by so many proposition experts this year. This topic lacks originality compared with Anhui volume, and its vision is not wide enough compared with Beijing volume. The setting of the question only stays in the field of China's ancient history and economic history. Moreover, there are more materials than problems, which is very uncoordinated, like a "big-headed doll". Relatively speaking, it is indeed much worse, but it is also a good question to do from the perspective of examining knowledge. The question of this topic contains three basic elements of historical things-reason (the first question), process (the third question, that is, "change") and influence (the second question), which is often analyzed in the history of high school and is also the embodiment of real ability. The test questions test the vastness of high school history from a narrow perspective.