Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Today in History - How to evaluate Fifteen Years of Wanli?
How to evaluate Fifteen Years of Wanli?
Fifteen Years of Wanli is a monograph on Ming history published by Sanlian Bookstore in May, 1997. The writer is Huang Renyu. In the book "Fifteen Years of Wanli", Huang Renyu analyzed the reasons why an imperial dynasty went from prosperity to decline with almost plain brushwork. These bland narratives have their own merits, and even readers who are not interested in history are worried.

Fifteen years of Wanli, irrelevant 1587. This year, the Spanish Armada is about to go to England and turn a new page in world history; However, it is easy for historians to overlook some events in China's court. These trivial things, such as the gale that began at the end of Qing dynasty, generally became a precursor to the collapse of the empire. From the emperor to the common people, they all became victims and suffered? According to historian Huang Renyu, causality is the focus of history.

Use the mathematical discourse model to analyze the book Fifteen Years of Wanli in detail? Social Problems in Xiangyin, chenchen? What is the conclusion? One hundred generations of accumulated disadvantages? Are you online? Feasible domain of feudal society? There is no solution, but there is a solution in a broader historical field: what is the solution? Modernization? Three words. The corrosion of social machines is either feudal or backward as most people think. A close reading of Fifteen Years of Wanli can find a wonderful exposition on this point.

This work has mixed reviews. Chen, a professor at Minzu University of China, believes that the narrative of specific historical facts in Fifteen Years of Wanli is not all true and reliable, and the conclusions drawn are biased and one-sided. As an academic work, it is unqualified. As a popular reading, spreading the wrong knowledge of Ming history is not worthy of recognition and enthusiasm. ? Chen said: I have checked the footnotes of Fifteen Years of Wanli, but none of them are complete quotations. Most of them have been cut off, or what are you doing? The Six Classics only use materials that are useful to me, and directly remove those that are useless. Some footnotes are not found at all. In other words, such a great history ignores the details, and it doesn't matter if the numbers are wrong or the details are wrong. ?