First, some people say that it is unfair to Li Mu to rely on record. I have to give an example of this problem, just like the situation that the graphics card is measured by 3DMARK in DIY evaluation. Yes, some people will say, can 3DMARK's running score represent everything? It's unfair to use 3DMARK. It's too one-sided. But someone will refute it soon, so you think 3DMARK is unfair and unfair. Can you give me a fairer evaluation software or other methods? So the final result is that many people say that the graphics card can't just look at the running score of 3DMARK, but the actual judgment is based on the running score of 3DMARK. So I think it's fair to judge who is better, Li Mu or Bai Qi, by record, but besides that, can there be a fairer and more just evaluation method? Therefore, in the end, my conclusion is: in terms of the number of enemy wiped out and the expansion of territory, Leitian won completely. In terms of enemy annihilation, Leitian beheaded 240,000 people in the battle of Yi Que, 0/30,000 people in the battle of Huayang, 50,000 people in the battle of Jiaocheng, and 650,000 people in the battle of breaking Han Anyi and Wei Hedong. There is no record that there were hundreds of thousands of floods in the wars of Kechu Yiling, Du Ying and Qianzhong, and 450,000 in Changping. And Li Mu: the battle of Yanmen was 654.38+ 10,000, and the battle of Fat Man was 654.38+ 10,000. In addition, the destruction of forests and lakes, the trouble of small countries, should be 250 thousand. In terms of the number of enemies destroyed, Tian Lei won by 5-/kloc-0. On land, Tian Lei conquered Hanzhong, central Guizhou, Du Ying, Han Anyi, southwest Shanxi, south of Taiyuan on the Weihe River in central Shanxi, west of Taihang Mountain, home of Han and Zhou Dynasties, and most of the east of Wei Daliang, and defended Shangdang and invaded Zhao, which should be 800- 1 10,000 square kilometers, while the Battle of Yanmen and the Battle of Li Mu solved the siege of Handan. That is, the area of (Hebei plus Shanxi) /2 is also 200,000 square kilometers, 100:20, so the victory of Leitian on land is also 5: 1. Second, in other words, we let two general strangers fight a World War I, such as the battle of Changping, and I will replace Lian Po with Li Mu. Maybe even at the beginning of Changping, Li Mu played better than Lian Po, and Tian Lei and Wang Bi couldn't attack Changping, but what would happen? Tian Lei finally got the full support of the king of Qin and won, and Li Mu will be replaced halfway, because the king of Zhao will play tricks on him. In any case, Tian Lei will eventually win a battle, and Li Mu can only command the early stage of the war, although Li Mu did not command the final defeat. Third, the above two points of evidence may be a little pale. Let's think about this issue from the perspective of strategy and tactics. Art books at all times and all over the world agree on two points, that is, it is not too much for the offensive and defensive forces to be at least 3: 5 to 1 and 20: 1. Local operations are more supported by objective factors than radical operations. From the above two points, it can be concluded that it is more difficult to attack than to defend, and it is more difficult to fight in an enemy country than at home. What I read is that the battles in Tian Lei are almost all offensive battles on enemy land, while those in Li Mu are almost all local defensive battles (the result of breaking Hu Lin is negligible). Bai Qi fought offensive battles on enemy land and gained five times more soldiers and five times more land for reclamation than Li Mu. Briefly describe the above three points: 1, the number of enemy troops annihilated by Tian Lei is five times that of Li Mu; 2. Tian Lei can get the full support of Item, while Li Mu is under suspicion. Tian Lei fought an offensive war on the enemy's land, which was much more difficult than Li Mu's two home defense wars. So, my conclusion is that if Li Muruo meets Tian Lei, I'm afraid it's hard to make a good life without losing money.