First of all, painting has many artistic expressions. For example, Chinese painting and oil painting are two completely different painting forms. And drawing people like "photos" is also a sign of lack of scientific knowledge.

First, after the invention of photography, the first photos were black and white, which is known to all.

Color photography was invented in 1950s. The color of original color photography is not ideal, and it can't be compared with the gorgeous and full color of painting.

China's first color film was Early Spring in February, which was shot in 1960s.

In the 1980s, ordinary people in China seldom had color photos.

In the 1990s, color photography entered the era of electronic photography.

Actually, photography and painting are not a means.

There may be some similarities in modeling effect.

For example, in general, when shooting a human body or portrait, the degree of fax is often better than painting.

But painting and photography are not the same thing

Photography will complete the "plastic arts" in a few seconds.

And painting (oil painting) needs not a few days, but dozens of days or even longer to complete the task of "plastic arts".

Through long-term description, oil painting will paint artistic objects more brilliant, profound and delicate, and painting can also paint something that photography can't express.

It's more faxed than photography, and there is no problem at all.

Because the color of oil painting is a fine chemical product, its granularity is finer than our pixels today, so it is natural that the fax degree is "super realistic" than photography.

Therefore, don't confuse photography with painting. It is unreasonable to think that the beauty of photography will replace the beauty of painting.

If we are in an era without photography, an oil painting portrait is very rare.

So today, a photo, that is, what a person can do without photography training, is a photo valuable or an oil painting valuable? I think oil painting is definitely more beautiful and valuable.

Why? Because painting can add the painter's thoughts, feelings and expressions, and can also enrich the content, which photography can't do at all.

Aesthetically speaking, photography has always been a learning of painting. This is the case today.

Therefore, the aesthetic advantage of painting is incomparable to photography.

It's like robots are more efficient than people. Why don't we have some robots instead of strangers?

This must be what a madman said, right?

Photography has brought us a lot of efficient services, and sometimes it is an important historical record. It can be said that 60% of the history of nearly a hundred years was recorded by photography, which is the happiness brought by science.

However, we also need some in-depth and meticulous taste and appreciation.

Surrealism painting is just a painting method, which is far from being comparable to photography in possibility.

However, the law of * * * in painting still restricts the ultra-realistic painting method, that is, the form of painting is not equal to the beauty of painting.

Great painting is definitely not a question of painting method, but a question of aesthetic value.