1, positive impact

Under the specific historical conditions at that time, Stalin made the Soviet Union rank among the industrialized countries through this construction model, which laid a material foundation for the victory of the world anti-fascist war. The establishment of "Stalin model" depended on the extremely backward level of social productive forces in the Soviet Union at that time, which was a feasible way for backward countries to realize industrialization and played an extremely important role in the process of the Soviet Union rapidly catching up with western developed countries.

2. Negative effects

However, this kind of high centralization not only takes the underdevelopment of the free market as its reason for existence, but also consolidates itself by monopolizing economic resources and restricting the development of market factors to save itself. Stalin's model requires the state to absolutely control the economic operation, which also requires the unprecedented state dictatorship as the backing. Therefore, it is inevitable that the party and government are not divided, power is highly concentrated, and personality cult and paternalism prevail, because these are only ways to consolidate state rule. Stalin model is totally incompatible with democracy and modern legal system. The difference between Soviet-style socialist nationalization and real socialist nationalization lies in that Stalin's model is to expand capital through state support when capital is underdeveloped, and capital must be absolutely controlled by the state; The purpose of socialist nationalization is to limit and eliminate capital, replace capital relations with socialist relations of production, and the control of means of production will gradually be taken over by society, all of which are based on the historical conditions of the development and decline of capital relations. So it is not difficult for us to understand the fate of Stalin's model. Stalin's system finally collapsed as the antagonistic contradiction between the over-centralized system and the growing market factors reached its peak. Under the unprecedented economic growth rate, the reality of extremely low economic efficiency is concealed, which is manifested in the following aspects: first, giving priority to the development of heavy industry, leaving agriculture and light industry in a backward state for a long time; Second, under the planned economy system, one-sided emphasis on output value and output leads to fewer varieties and poor quality of products. Third, the state has taken too many things from farmers, which has seriously damaged the interests of farmers. Farmers have no enthusiasm for production and agricultural output has stagnated for a long time. Fourth, the economic development is extensive, the economic benefit is low, and a lot of resources are wasted. Fifth, the state's monopoly on economic resources has caused corruption in state organs. So this kind of economic growth is inevitably unsustainable. With the passage of time, a series of disadvantages of Stalin's model are increasingly exposed. In the long run, it seriously hindered the further development of the Soviet Union and eventually led to the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1995438+0.