Is practice the only criterion for testing truth? That's not true. Practice is the process and way to test the truth; Scientific practice is the only process and way to test the truth. In the process of practice, theory will be produced, which will guide and serve practice. Is it correct in practice? Practice and mistakes? Practice, the correct theory guides the correct practice, wrong? Wrong theoretical guidance? practice Secondly, practice has its time limitations or space-time limitations. Practice is the process, way, path and strict significance of testing truth. Practice cannot be used as any criterion for testing truth, and truth is discovered through exploration. Not checked. The word "standards used in practice" itself confuses the concept. Practice refers to what to do, which is a verb. Standards are adjectives or adverbs in nouns. The meaning of standard: it is the standard to measure things; Things that meet the standards themselves can be compared and tested with similar things; Quote an example; Specifications. "Standard" means to express a standard. There is a standard for everything. As a goal, we should ask ourselves or others. Standards often have a far-reaching impact on aspects that should be taken seriously, such as the safety, reliability and efficiency of machines and tools, toys, medical equipment, laws, regulations and human behavior. Practice is the result of people's subjective behavior. In the process and approach of practice, there are inevitably correct and wrong conscious practices in people's subjective conscious behavior. The correct way is the correct reflection of objective things, and the wrong way is the wrong reflection of objective things. Too much emphasis on practice is the only criterion for testing truth. Practice may become dogmatism and empiricism, and things will develop into diversity, which is contingency, inevitability, irregularity and randomness.
What is the only criterion for testing truth?
A: "Time and history" are the only criteria for testing the truth of everything. What is truth? The standard of truth refers to conformity with objective laws. The objective law is not immutable, nor is the truth immutable. When the objective regularity changes, the truth will change, and the truth will change with the change of time regularity. In this environment, the truth of different environments does not necessarily have truth, and the truth of different environments conforms to the objective laws of different environments. In this environment, the truth is the truth in this environment. If the truth in another environment changes, it may become a fallacy, and the development law of truth in different environments is different. Truth has many essences. The objective regularity of different fields is the truth of different fields. For example, scientific development, invention and creation means constantly searching for new objective laws and obtaining new truths. Truth is not in the hands of most people, but in the hands of a few people. Truth is in the mind of people who constantly explore and discover new objective laws. Truth has scientific regularity. Truth is not eternal uniqueness, truth is relative, and truth is the standard of relatively objective laws. Time movement is an eternal absolute standard. Truth conforms to objective laws and scientific laws, and changes with the development of objective laws and scientific laws. Truth is not static, but moves with the movement of time. Truth is not absolutely eternal, but relatively eternal.
Why is time and history the only criterion for testing truth?
Time or space-time is the manifestation of absolute motion. Time or space-time has no beginning or end, and absolute motion is a different expression of absolute motion. The absolute of matter includes no beginning and no end, including time or space-time without beginning and no end. Absolute motion is the uniqueness of matter, and time or space-time is the only criterion to test all truth! Practice is the development of relative things, dialectics is divided into two, and the standard of testing truth by practice is relative, not absolute; Time or space-time is absolute and contains relativity; Time or space-time is this set (original set), practice is a subset of time or space-time, practice belongs to time or space-time, practice can be practiced in time or space-time, practice is inseparable from time, and practice depends on time. Practice is not only the practice of human behavior, but also the embodiment of human subjective initiative. Time is the objectivity of the development and change of all things, with no beginning and no end. Whether everything is correct or not must stand the test of time and history. Materialist dialectics is divided into two parts, which are unity of opposites and complement each other. The characteristics of materialist dialectics are relative. Only the movement of time and space-time is absolute.
Matter determines consciousness (wrong ×)
Matter comes first, and consciousness comes second? . However, it is not entirely correct that matter determines consciousness. Consciousness has a reaction to matter, and the reaction of matter and consciousness to matter is not equal. The reaction of consciousness to matter is far greater than that of matter to meaning. For example, a car is a substance and a person's conscious thinking. It dominates the movement of driving a car, social activities or social development, people's way of life, constantly learning and exploring the law of things development, and so on. People's consciousness played a role. Humans can destroy themselves through their own consciousness, or they can use nuclear materials to destroy other substances. Quantum matter particles prove that matter itself is random, and human consciousness can change the randomness of matter. Matter determines consciousness is relative. Does man's thinking depend on material thinking or material thinking depends on consciousness? A: Both are indispensable. The human consciousness of advanced animals can not be separated from matter, and matter can not be separated from consciousness, such as stones and metals. Pure matter has no consciousness, and matter itself has no thinking. When consciousness and matter coexist, the reactivity of consciousness is far greater than its material function. If a matter consciousness and matter coexist, quantum matter particles are random, which determines that sometimes consciousness determines matter, immaterial determines consciousness, sometimes matter determines consciousness, matter determines consciousness, and consciousness determines matter, which is not fixed. Matter and consciousness are changeable. For example: intelligent animals such as humans! Matter determines consciousness conditionally, and pure matter determines matter. When human life exists and consciousness and matter coexist, consciousness variables determine material variables, and consciousness determines material. People's life is gone, and it is the material variable that determines the consciousness variable. At the end of life, it is the material that determines the material. When life exists, matter determines that consciousness is relative.
Marxism overemphasizes the uniqueness and decisiveness of matter, without considering the reaction of consciousness. Matter will always be matter, and pure material mechanical materialism is at work. Marxism artificially separates the relationship between the action and reaction of matter and consciousness. For people, matter acts on consciousness, and consciousness also acts on matter. The reaction of human consciousness is far greater than its materiality, and both are indispensable, which is dialectical unity. Marxism overemphasizes the importance of matter, ignores the reaction of consciousness to matter, and denies its own dialectical relationship. Marxism can't answer that the development of things has no beginning or end. Marxism holds that things begin and end, such as primitive society, slave society, feudal society, capitalist society, state capitalist society or socialist society, and finally communist society. Marxism only recognizes the consistency of social development. Is that correct? A: The development of things will never have a beginning or an end, the universe will never have a beginning or an end, and the essence of the development of things will never have a beginning or an end, which is random.
Why do you say that the development of things has no beginning and no end? Give an example of a philosophical question "which came first, the chicken or the egg". The answer is: it has no beginning and no end. For example, ask "does solar energy rise in the west?" Answer: The sun can come out from any angle! "Compared with the rotation of the earth in the solar system and the position of human beings on the earth, we can see that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. Compared with different positions in outer space or outside the solar system, when a species looks at the position of the sun, the sun can rise and set from any angle. The beginning and end of things are relative, and the non-existence of things is always absolute.
The cycle of this thing does not refer to the cycle of human society from low to high, and then from high to low. Human society is relative to the circulation of nature and the universe. All species on the earth, including human beings, circulate in the universe at any time, and at some point in the future, these species may disappear from the universe forever. Life is consistent with itself, but not with nature; The earth has always been relative to itself and its laws of motion, and has no beginning or end relative to the universe; The universe is relatively constant and the universe is relatively unknown. The universe has no beginning and no end. Things are always relative, without beginning or end is absolute, and so is movement. The randomness of things includes contingency, inevitability and irregularity, with no beginning and no end. The law of things' development and movement is always cyclic randomness without beginning and end.
Consciousness is not the material of general physics, nor is it the material expounded by Marxism on materialism. The material of general physics is in a narrow sense, and consciousness is a metamaterial in a broad sense, which is invisible. It is tentatively defined as "metamaterials or invisible substances are not substances". Metamaterials and ordinary substances are completely different concepts and cannot be completely explained by general physics. Such as unexplained cosmic black holes and dark matter. In the unknown universe, just like consciousness, it exists in our daily life. They are also called substances, but not substances in the traditional sense. Dark matter is also called non-gravitational matter, and consciousness belongs to invisible matter, which is neither matter nor metamatter. Consciousness, that is, thinking, is invisible, intangible and invisible matter, immaterial or metamaterial matter. It exists in nature in the universe, consciousness is dissolved in water, and cells of different species are parasitic in the water. Water contains consciousness, and consciousness is dissolved in water. Water is H2O, which exists in gas, liquid and solid in the universe. Consciousness, an invisible substance, exists in the universe. Matter without water has no conscious thinking function. Water is the foundation of life of all species. Pure matter has no life and no thinking. Only when specific matter and water coexist can matter and life coexist and matter can exist. In the universe, where there is water H2O, there is life and consciousness. Water is the medium of consciousness and matter. Conscious thinking has the randomness of inevitability, contingency, reproducibility, printability, heredity, exclusion and attraction. Life comes from water, and consciousness comes from life. A: Consciousness is soluble in water. If we can find water H2O in the universe, we can find life and consciously exist. Consciousness and life are indispensable, and consciousness is soluble in water.
Why do you say that too much emphasis on practice may become dogmatism and empiricism? Practice is too general and general, even if you scratch your hair and beard, dogmatism and empiricism may appear! Without practice and theory derived from practice, everything is not feasible and forbidden. For example, the modern warfare in the future is definitely not a land, sea and air war in the traditional sense, but an unconventional, anti-theoretical, anti-traditional and unconventional war, such as cyber warfare, information station and space station. Without experience, it is impossible to really practice in advance! Without practice and theory, there would be no war. For example, Sun Jian, the first person to use the "empty city plan", had a sudden idea that the "empty city plan" had never been tested in practice on the battlefield! Has the scientific definition been proved correct by practice? Yes, all simulation deduction has not been proved by real practice, and simulation deduction is unscientific. Future wars are wars that transcend existing practice and surreal science. Einstein's theory of relativity, a great scientist, is generally regarded as correct by the scientific sessions in the past 100 years, traveling through time and space and dreaming; However, with the continuous progress and development of new science, the particles of quantum matter are random. A large number of experiments in quantum mechanics show that relativity is limited, Einstein's theory of time relativity is wrong, and there are many phenomena in the universe that Newton's gravity can't fully explain in traditional physics. Things develop in negation, inherit in negation, and deny in inheritance, and things will always develop according to scientific laws. Too much emphasis on practice will inevitably lead to empiricism and dogmatism, and the epidemic situation is a good example! Practice includes not only scientific experiments, but also dogmatism and empiricism. Any practice, including social practice, is people's subjective and conscious behavior. Subjective conscious behavior will inevitably lead to correct practice and wrong practice. Everything is inseparable from time, and everything changes with time. For example, practice is the Monkey King, and time or space is Buddha's palm? Heart, practice will never jump out of the test of time and history. Putting forward practice for the first time is the only criterion for testing truth. Objectively speaking, this theory is based on the historical needs of the early reform at that time, the urgent need of socialist modernization and promoting social progress and development, the urgent need of emancipating people's minds in political work, and the need of exploring and discovering objective laws of truth. The practice process has always been one of the sources and driving forces to promote social development! Is not the only criterion for testing truth. Time history is the criterion and standard to measure everything, and time is the best touchstone.
Time never speaks, but answers all questions. Matter first, consciousness second, whether matter decides consciousness or consciousness decides matter are all discussed in practice. Their authenticity needs the test of time and history, and needs scientific proof for a long time to come. Future, time and history are the only fundamental criteria for testing all truths or things. (End)