I suggest you start from four aspects: first, clarify the guiding ideology of studying history and clarify many misunderstandings in studying history. For example, if you think history is not a science, you can study it well, but you can ignore it at ordinary times. You can just make a surprise attack during the exam ... These are incorrect understandings and should be corrected. Second, under the guidance of teachers, we should explore a set of methods suitable for studying history as soon as possible, such as how to read textbooks, how to attend classes, how to preview and review, how to summarize, how to do multiple-choice questions, how to do non-multiple-choice questions and so on. Thirdly, understand on the basis of memory, remember on the basis of understanding, and form a knowledge network. In other words, we should connect the knowledge points into lines, connect the lines of knowledge into faces, and connect the faces of knowledge into a whole. Step by step. In terms of knowledge memory, ability training, test-taking strategies, etc., we should not be eager to achieve success, but should move closer to the requirements of the college entrance examination step by step according to our own reality. The above four points are for your reference. How to learn specifically, what difficulties will you encounter in the future, and will you communicate then? How to learn history well What I want to say about history is that the key lies in peacetime, and cramming is useless. Especially for the students who take the small comprehensive test or the big comprehensive test, the usual foundation is the key to winning or losing. I have suffered such losses myself. Wei Xie, who taught me history, is a very conscientious teacher. His class seems to have a kind of magic that attracts you tightly. Under his explanation, the long river of history seems to be drawing closer to us at once. More importantly, he can always guide us to think about the relationship and essence behind them through complicated historical phenomena. This is the most important way to learn history. Under his guidance, I successfully studied history in my freshman year. Perhaps he was carried away by victory and began to be lazy in senior two. I no longer pay attention to mastering the basic knowledge in time. I just memorized it temporarily before the exam. I didn't know how stupid I was until I reviewed next semester in senior three. Because of my solid basic skills, I can recall all the contents effortlessly. But even after reading the text of Grade Two for several times, it is still possible to forget it. I just know why the teacher always asks us to "lay stress on the foundation and focus on peace". The study of history in senior one is completely different from that in junior high school. Rote memorization will not solve the problem. What high school history needs more is understanding. It is best to review once a week and once a month. The key to review is to read books repeatedly and improve in repetition. Books are the most fundamental. It is unrealistic to talk without books. When reading the contents of each section, we should think about what happened before and after a historical event and whether there is any internal connection between them. Is there any historical truth to explain? You can also compare historical events horizontally and vertically. For example, what are the similarities and differences between two coups or two policies? Why are there such similarities and differences? What does it mean? It is also very simple to analyze similarities and differences, which is nothing more than thinking from several fixed plates such as background, nature and influence. Some books say that history should be studied in three dimensions. I think the so-called "three-dimensional" is probably the connection between horizontal and vertical. If we often think like this, we can analyze the essence of different historical phenomena more accurately, and no matter what problems we encounter, we can solve them easily. This is a problem that we should pay attention to when reading. Books are more than just reading. It's no use remembering some times, places and events. The most important thing is to learn to think and study with historical thinking and explore what is behind the incident. I'm sure you'll find out soon. The more you read history, the more interesting it becomes. Secondly, it is also important to do the questions. The process of doing the problem is actually a process of review and reflection. Nowadays, there are few historical questions that simply test knowledge itself. They often test your analysis of events. This requires the set of kung fu accumulated in reading and some skills. For example, when doing multiple-choice questions, we often encounter some problems such as "root" and "essence", which are usually analyzed from the aspects that productivity determines production relations and economic base determines superstructure. As long as there are options about these aspects, they are generally correct. In my opinion, the questions of "direct" and "indirect" are actually very simple. When you answer "directly", you should make your thinking simpler and think what you thought at first. You don't have to turn any corners at all. Everything except "direct" can be safely classified as "indirect". As for questions and answers, you need your thinking and analytical skills. Don't expect the questions on the test paper to be what you have read before, let alone bother to recite a certain question. As long as the method is mastered, the question and answer can be solved well. The first is analysis. By recalling the teacher's time-sharing introduction, try to think about this problem from more angles. Don't worry about thinking too much, as long as you think it makes sense, it may be correct. What's more, the current exam has repeatedly stressed that "students should be encouraged to play freely, be brave in innovation and have their own opinions", so you should think as much as possible. The second is expression. It is best to elaborate one by one, writing one or two lines at a time. The key is to write down the main points, because it is also necessary when marking papers. A point should be rounded off several times before it is finished, which will not only pretend to be the host, but also make the teacher deduct points because he can't find the point, and will waste a lot of time so that he can't finish the paper. Another skill in grading papers is that he decides how many points to score according to a given score. Generally, one point is two or three points. If a question is eight, there are probably four main points. This method can effectively reduce the possibility of missing answers. Also, try to fill in the calculated figures. At the same time, pay attention to the sequence number. If the big dots are marked with different serial numbers, they will be clear and logical, and it is not easy to lose points. Finally, the handwriting must be neat. Think about it. A teacher must finish so many papers in such a short time. If the handwriting is scrawled, which marking teacher will give you a high score in a good mood?