The history of world civilization is not only a history from archaeological remains, but also a history that can be mutually confirmed from written records. The so-called scholars who simply deny the ancient Egyptian civilization, Babylonian civilization and Greek civilization from archaeology have entered the misunderstanding of interpreting history.

Since the ancient Egyptian civilization and Babylonian civilization came into being, civilizations all over the world have not existed in isolation, but can confirm each other. You said the pyramids were forged, but the ancient Romans dealt with the ancient Egyptians, and the historical records of ancient Rome can prove the existence of ancient Egypt. You said there was no ancient Rome, but not only the historical records of Persians can be confirmed, but also the historical records of China have the Silk Road leading to the west. Which civilization does the West refer to?

If there is no history of ancient civilization in the west for more than 1000 years, then the Silk Road that has existed since Qin and Han Dynasties is a myth fabricated by our history books. We have recorded the ancient history of the Silk Road, and I am afraid it will also be questioned? If you want to void the history of others, you must first rewrite your own history of interacting with others. Can history be written at will? The history from archaeological remains is not credible. Is it not credible if it is confirmed by written records?

The so-called national self-confidence is so extreme that it can only be established by ignoring the history of others and relying on the long history and glory of ancestors. How pathetic is that?

A person can only be proud of the glory of his ancestors, which is precisely his least confident performance. Only the worst people in real life, who have nothing to look up to, will try to find a sense of existence from the glory of their ancestors.