It is said that everyone thinks that history is "memorizing kung fu", but it is not. History needs to be understood by rote. A historical event, you can string together its time, people involved, background, influence, significance and lessons to understand "Ah, so that's it!" Sometimes when you do a problem, you will naturally filter out at least two wrong options, and the remaining one or two answers are usually to test your memory. If the wrong options are excluded with the profound meaning of understanding, the correct rate of the answer will be higher. The premise is that your understanding is correct. More generally speaking, it is what the textbook wants to convey to you and what the teacher wants to convey to you. My personal experience is that you can't learn history by rote, but by understanding. After understanding, even if the answer doesn't completely copy the original words in the book, your theory is still there, so that you won't be unable to write it because you haven't remembered the knowledge points, resulting in no score.