Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Today in History - Objectively speaking, who are the top ten butchers in world history, and how much does our country account for? Can Emperor Hirohito, an island country, make the list?
Objectively speaking, who are the top ten butchers in world history, and how much does our country account for? Can Emperor Hirohito, an island country, make the list?
The so-called top ten butchers have different opinions, so opinions vary. Personally, I think it should be a large number of direct killings of unrelated military personnel and non-hostile personnel. Otherwise, "I don't kill Boren, Boren dies because of me" is hard to say.

The first one should be Genghis Khan. According to clear data, he ordered the slaughter of no fewer civilians10 million. In the Southern Song Dynasty alone, there were at least 30 massacres of more than 10,000 people recorded in Xixia and Xiliao. Studies have shown that the direct death toll of the war he launched is no less than 1 100 million.

Second, his grandson Kublai Khan, for the same reason.

Third, it should be Hirohito. It cannot be said that he was not responsible for the civilian deaths in World War II.

Fourth, as we all know, Hitler with a moustache.

Fifth, Dourgen, a series of massacres in the Qing Dynasty from Jiangbei to Vietnam are recorded in history. In Chengdu alone, more than 400,000 people were killed. It is said that Yunnan and Guizhou were completely extinct. In the Qing Dynasty, about 10 million people were transferred from Shaanxi and Hunan to enrich their places. You can see the relevant records of Japan, North Korea and Vietnam at the same time.

Sixth, in Huang Chao, which is crazy to the point of anti-humanity, at least Hitler won't eat his own flesh. According to records, no fewer than five million people died at their hands.

Seventh, the massacre of Central American Indians by European missionary groups means that the name of the emissary can't be remembered. According to documents, the population of the Inca Empire was12 million, and it was less than10 million after 50 years.

Eighth, Schleswig-Holstein, this man's slaughter of the Han nationality was the peak of the Five Revolutions. In Luoyang alone, more than one million people were killed and more than 200,000 people were slaughtered more than ten times.

Ninth, Nurhachi, an encyclopedia of specific information, has about 4 million Han and Mongolian people in Liaodong. After he was slaughtered, the total population of Huang Taiji and the savage Jurchen at the time of the founding of the People's Republic was only 300,000, which has not been counted in the customs.

Zhang, the tenth flood, encyclopedia of specific information

What I'm talking about is finding clear murder data, such as Tian Lei Nero Monroe, which was not included because of data problems.

In addition, I would like to talk about my views on some controversial figures. Although Qin Shihuang Ming Taizu killed many people, he was only a tyrant. People are not counted, because they have not slaughtered their own people clearly many times.

In addition, I don't agree that the death penalty can be abolished, because in comparison, we are just weaker than those who are powerful. If we don't care what the price is, the other party can make us disappear dozens of times, and no matter how hard we try, we can't hurt each other. Without the deterrent effect of the death penalty, what can be made up for if you go on medical parole and suspend execution, so that a person who has been sentenced to 300 years of heinous crimes can come out of the detention center in three hours. At present, neither procedural justice in the western legal system nor consequential justice in China's legal system can guarantee complete social fairness. The purpose of the death penalty is not to kill people, but to comfort innocent people and warn those who live with sin later. This is the greatest significance of the law depriving people of their lives. If the death penalty can be used to slaughter the same kind, then the death penalty should be imposed on those who master the death penalty, so as to ensure that most people live.

In addition, the two sides of the war cannot be measured by war. Otherwise, Roosevelt should not fight back against Japan. The three major battles are inevitable, the essence of which is the struggle between proletarian interest groups and big bourgeois interest groups, and the all-round confrontation of cultural concepts, technology and even history, which is very complicated. You can't say that all the people who died were our own, you can only stand on one side against the other. The former United the vast majority of middle and lower classes and small and medium-sized capitalists who were dissatisfied with the big capitalists, so they won, and many lower classes were just fighting for the chance of survival.

Loyal traitors never use the death penalty to kill. Any political event will cause disasters for millions of people.

All hands up, at least give an answer, I'm exhausted.