There is a high probability that short videos are becoming a highland of intellectual property infringement on the Internet. They use various means to evade the supervision of the platform, but in fact they all abstained, but they were not detected by the monitoring means of the platform, and these operators were not sanctioned.

There are many short-sighted things, such as a sketch, a cross talk, a fragment of a film and television drama, MVs of some songs, and explanations of some movies. This is not done by the operator of this number at all. He stole the word from others and used it. I don't think there's anything wrong with it. He is a video thief. He is not the producer of this video at all. The purpose is to cultivate his current number.

These content thieves have their own skills, that is, the three main means, that is, cutting off the head and adding watermark, changing narration and adding sound, and transcribing the content into audio. Basically these three meanings, what do you mean? Actually, it's very simple. It's nice to see a video made by someone else. If I say that his video is 5 minutes long and I pinch a part from it, I will pinch a 30-second to 60-second video, cut a part of the footage and put it together, add my own watermark, and add a narration and background music myself. Basically, most platforms can pass the review.

Another kind of concealment is the so-called manuscript editing, which is also easy to understand. For example, Zhang San made a video with his own video to explain his views on some things that are happening now. After reading it, I think what Zhang San said is really good, quite good, but what he did was audio. I converted what he said into words, and then changed the format slightly to match the pictures. Isn't that my specialty? This method is hidden, usually the platform can't be found, but when you read some articles online, you obviously feel that his modal particles, its pause and so on are abnormal, which proves that he didn't even understand the manuscript.

In order to effectively punish these behaviors, we must protect the interests of the creators. In other words, I wrote this video and this article, and you can reprint it if you want, but you have to get my permission. If I want, I will let you reprint it directly for free. It doesn't matter. I don't want you to reprint it. After you reprint it, you will be punished for writing from the media, that is, what you write yourself is called from the media. Did you write it yourself when you copied others? If you want to do it for a long time, you must have your own opinions and things, not just copy others'.