Is Napoleon calling himself emperor a retrogression in history?
Napoleon's claim to be emperor is a retrogression in history. There are three reasons: first, Napoleon proclaimed himself emperor and practiced autocratic rule, which seriously undermined the principle of = = = human rights and violated the trend of historical development. Secondly, Napoleon restored the authority of Catholicism and made the church, once the pillar of feudal dynasty, serve his rule. Third, Napoleon restored aristocratic rule and destroyed the principle of equality of citizens. Therefore, Napoleon's claim to be emperor is a retrogression in history. After Napoleon proclaimed himself emperor, no Frenchman protested like Beethoven, a talented composer living in Vienna. Therefore, Napoleon's claim to be emperor is a retrogression in history. Disagreement is retrogression. Throughout Napoleon's life, there were mistakes, but he took a series of measures conducive to political stability and capitalist development. (Political, economic, legal, cultural and educational measures) These measures maintained the achievements of the Great Revolution, consolidated the rule of the French bourgeoisie, and did not return France to feudal society. He is the emperor of the bourgeoisie. Therefore, we think Napoleon is a great politician. Napoleon paid special attention to science education and technical talents. I have another example of Napoleon's employment. Napoleon was also a hero who changed the history of Europe. Wherever the French army went, it drove away the nobles, publicized the ideas of the Great Revolution, shook the feudal ruling order in the European continent, and played a progressive role in Europe. Therefore, we say that Napoleon is a hero, a hero who changed the history of Europe. Napoleon's foreign war brought profound disasters to all countries and nationalities in Europe, and he was the chief culprit of this war. The Napoleonic Wars also brought great disasters to France itself. (Argument omitted) Napoleon made outstanding contributions all his life. Napoleon was a strategist and politician of the new bourgeoisie. He attacked the feudal reactionary forces at home and abroad, promoted the awakening of the European people and defended the achievements of the French revolution. This is his main achievement. However, Napoleon, after all, is the representative of the bourgeoisie, which has the limitations of his time and class. His victory strengthened his pride, carried away his mind, and even encouraged his ambition to fight for the world and invade everywhere, which eventually led to his demise.