Li Ling stayed in Xiongnu for twenty-five years, and gave birth to several children with his wife Pianpo, while the rest basically did nothing, just surviving. Khan was assigned to be a lobbyist to persuade his old friend Su Wu. They met several times, drank some wine, and probably presented some poems to each other (but other poems in Zhaoming Wenxuan and Yiwen Lei Ju were suspected to be fake). Su Wu, of course, was not convinced, but they still maintained a deep friendship, so that Su Wu later returned to South Korea and said a few words to him. In the second year of Yuan Dynasty (87 BC), Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty died, and Emperor Zhao of the Han Dynasty succeeded to the throne at the age of eight, assisted by Huo Guang, the general of Fu, Shi Dan, the general of Che Qi, and Shangguan Jie, the general of Zuo. Huo Guang used to be good friends with Shangguan Jie and Li Ling, and knew him very well, as well as what happened to him. Therefore, although I regret the fall of Li Ling, I sympathize with his misfortune and understand his difficulties. So Ren sent others to Xiongnu to try to get Li Ling back. Li Ling's heart has long since died, and his country is like a dream, but his relatives are gone. Those who have lost their homes, relatives and reputations are just waiting for death. What are the benefits of returning goods? So only "husband can't bully again" declined. Actually, this should be an excuse. If Li Ling really doesn't have a motherland in his heart and works for the Huns wholeheartedly, I'm afraid Shangqiu City at the foot of Xunji Mountain will not get away with it so easily. In the first year of Yuanping (the first seven or four years), Li Ling died of illness in the wild land of Xiongnu, fulfilling the promise that "people were born without a name, but died and were buried in the wild". The evaluation of Li Ling's life is controversial, but no one can say much, because his case was decided by Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty and was destroyed by the clan. Sima Qian, the only one who spoke for him, was also punished by corruption and was particularly lenient; So who dares to speak for him Although Hanwu repented in his later years, he did not put it into action. A relatively objective evaluation of Li Ling has yet to be made after the death of Hanwu. This is the purpose of being an envoy to the Huns mentioned earlier. However, the controversy over the evaluation of Li Ling is far from over, but has lasted for thousands of years. Especially in every special historical period, he will be turned over by some people, relegated or sympathized again. Its purpose is mostly to borrow the deeds of the ancients, to pour out their hearts and express their respective arms. Later generations criticized Li Ling, and so did sympathizers. The latter will not be repeated; The famous critic of Liling is Mr. Fu Zhi, Wang of Chuanshan in the late Ming Dynasty. In his masterpiece Zi Zhi Tong Jian, he sharply criticized Li Ling. Even Sima Qian, who defended him together, also lamented together. Mr. Chuanshan is a man I admire very much. But here, I will try my best to make some cross-era comments and refutations on Mr. Chuanshan's theory based on facts. Mr. Chuanshan's History as a Mirror (Volume 30 of Emperor Wu): "Sima Qian made history with his personal interests, and Ban Gu laughed at his disloyalty and allowed it. The fall of Li Ling is also a crime that cannot be covered up. If you are helpless and walk out of the fortress with 5 thousand soldiers, Ling is brave for a while, not the resignation of Emperor Wu. If the Ling family also marries, it will be a disaster for Xu Lai. Later, Li Guangli levied Xiongnu, and Ling rode more than 30,000 troops to chase the Han army, fighting for 9 days. Will it also be blamed on Xu? Yue Ling, for example, was bound by Khan's system and had to catch up with the soldiers. How can Huns not be trusted? Ling Ling has two bare hearts. How can Khan trust Ling Ling and entrust him with heavy troops to go deep into it and fight against Han Jiang? He moved it to the mausoleum and praised Li Guang endlessly to reward his career. Moving books, in order to recite the words of public friends, is evil enough to believe? Surrender for the general and fight for it. Although you want to wash away its pollution, it is only a matter of elements, and you can't recover it. If you mourn for a big holiday, there is nothing. Guan Yu was lucky to return to Zhaolie. If you die in the battle of white horse and lose to Yan Liang, you will eventually become a person who does the opposite, but you are ridiculous. Li Ling said, "Think hard and repay Korea", but he was ashamed of Su Wu and made a speech. Its retrogression is also true, and it is not the income of moving, nor is it ignorant. " Sima Qian was humiliated for the case of Li Ling and had to endure the greatest humiliation that a living person could endure for a long time. Therefore, he "has nine intestines a day" and buried himself in making history as his father's entrustment; It is understandable if the comments tend to express the stagnation in the chest. However, Sima Qian's principle of seeking truth from historians is also recognized by the world. When expounding the facts, he tried his best to research and sort out, eliminating the false and retaining the true. That is, taking Li Ling's deeds described by him as an example, Ban Gu "ridiculed his disloyalty" for the need of maintaining the Han Dynasty; Most of the records of Li Ling in the Han Dynasty compiled by him inherited the facts listed by Sima Qian, and there was little difference between them. In other words, Sima Guangxiu's Purple Tongzhi Sword in Song Dynasty is also based on this. This is enough to show that Sima Qian's description of Li Ling's experience is basically based on facts, and it is by no means "creating history with one's own selfish interests". That is, he said in his comments, "I can't say anything when I see General Li as a gentleman. On the day of death, what the world knows or doesn't know is mourning. Is his loyalty to the literati sincere? As the saying goes,' peaches and plums don't say anything, next time they have their own way'. Although this statement is small, it can be said to be big. Although there is suspicion of Li Ling's literary decoration, it is basically based on facts, not too much. Therefore, Mr. Chuanshan thinks that "moving"