Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Today in History - How to treat the authenticity of ancient historical materials correctly?
How to treat the authenticity of ancient historical materials correctly?
The newly discovered data show that when compiling the twenty-four histories, the Qing Dynasty made a lot of revisions to the historical materials since the Jin Dynasty, and destroyed a large number of original folk books through the literary inquisition, such as some # Yongle Dadian, Tiangong Wu Kai, and the general compilation of martial arts classics. Another example is the slander that there are 100,000 eunuchs in Ming Dynasty (there are only 99% and 99.5 rooms in the Forbidden City, so it is impossible to keep the royal family, maids and official posts) and Zhang killed 100 million people in Sichuan (what was the population of China at that time? ), as well as the Qing emperor's arbitrariness of history books (the emperor must not read history books, nor can he change them, because history books are as iron as a pen. The first emperor to read the memoirs was Li Shimin. Li Shimin killed his brother and forced his father to abdicate, so he read the memoirs. But he didn't dare to change after all, just looking for someone else to greatly beautify him. So there are two Tang Shi in the twenty-five histories, and they are completely different. The first one is Judy, whose name and words are not as good as Li Shimin's, so the record was changed, but the birth mother # didn't want it, and the next Ming Chengzu didn't change it. He didn't want to, but he didn't dare. A large group of civil servants are staring at # Now, it's just an expression. # It's very different if you really want to use your head to scold $ Qing Dynasty. The emperor is the master and all officials are slaves. Look at the books of Emperor Kangxi and Yong Zhengdi. The emperor often said, "Don't record this #, just tick $ from the file $." What is this document? solid