Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Today in History - The most influential subject in the new college entrance examination is not chemistry, but this subject. Teachers in key high schools have a sense of crisis.
The most influential subject in the new college entrance examination is not chemistry, but this subject. Teachers in key high schools have a sense of crisis.
In the new college entrance examination scheme, too many majors in colleges tend to choose physics, will it lead to a sharp drop in the number of students who choose history?

As a revised version of the "3+ 1+2" model, the new college entrance examination makes up for some shortcomings of the "3+3" model. Its greatest advantage is that it helps to solve the phenomenon of "abandoning physics" because physics has become a compulsory subject in science and engineering, and the original score is included in the total score, but this model also has shortcomings.

First, the original intention of "3+ 1+2" mode is to protect physics and history!

Physics is the father of science and history is the mother of humanity. These two subjects are very important for students or human society. According to the relevant explanation of the Ministry of Education:

History:

The foundation of social science tells us where the past came from;

A lighthouse for observing human civilization, with heavy feelings and penetrating power.

Physics:

It is the foundation of natural science and tells us where to go in the future;

Casting a ladder to open up the future has a sense of direction and source power.

Seeing this, you should understand why the "3+ 1+2" model takes physics and history as compulsory subjects, right? This has greatly improved the status of these two subjects, and also brought endless motivation to physics teachers and history teachers in senior high schools.

However, the history teacher soon discovered that this was not the case!

Second, as a result of the "3+ 1+2" model, more people choose history, but there are no good students!

Under the mode of "3+ 1+2", physics, literature and history are compulsory for science and engineering, and most of them are optional for history. On the surface, the problem is not big.

But because physics and history can't be chosen together, students who choose physics and history are admitted separately. Choosing history students means that there are fewer optional majors, and the scores of college entrance examination will naturally rise, and all science, engineering, agriculture and medicine are basically missed. In this case, when high school students choose subjects, those with better grades will choose physics.

The number of people who choose history will not be less! After all, there are too many students in the middle and lower grades, but there may not be many students who choose history in key high schools. In this way, although the number of students who choose history is large, the quality has plummeted.

Let history and physics "PK" directly, and history will basically fail miserably. Does this protect the history discipline?

As long as it is reform, it will not be smooth sailing. We just need to be more cautious about the future of students and the country, because once something happens, it will affect the fate of many people and families.